Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal Credit - is there a Job Centre "rulebook"? Feel free to advise too...


rainbo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

The background to why I'm asking...

My friend has just moved into a UC area.

He was on ESA WRAG (mental health issues) and HB at his old place, single person claim.

The move into UC area = change of circumstance means he's been forced to claim UC.

 

At the Job Centre appt last week to prove his identity and get him onto the system,

they said even though he's already on ESA,

this UC claim has ended his ESA entitlement and that he needs to get a fit note to start the assessment process all over again.

 

Problem is, having just moved into the area, he's only just applied for a GP so still waiting for the "10 days minimum" before he's fully registered and can get an appt.

 

JC lady set the next appt to bring in fit note for the following week and to request a different appt on his "journal" if he couldn't get a fit note by then. As this was the case, he requested a different appt, JC advisor wrote back saying this was fine and gave a new appt for the week after next.

 

Today he's received a phone call from her,

saying that he needed to agree to this change in his journal and the things in his TO DO LIST, or he would be sanctioned?!?!

 

In the TO DO LIST she's sent him a page of sanction info to agree to, about what would happen if doesn't stick to his committments, and it lists all stuff about looking for work, taking any paid work he can do, and being available for interviews etc.

 

I don't believe he should be agreeing to this.

I've told him not to do anything until I've read the UC rules that the JC staff have to stick to.

 

So please, could someone point me to the Universal Credit rules for JC workers please?

And if anyone has advice regarding anything I've written above, please do let me know.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another thought...

 

As he's already on ESA, surely that by being awarded ESA the government has "approved" his entitlement? And therefore he shouldn't be having to get a fit note to prove he's too ill to work under UC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will have to wait until our experts are logged on rainbo and hopefully get the correct links and advice.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update

- I wrote a note for him and on behalf of him, part of it said:

"According to https://www.entitledto.co.uk/help/Universal_Credit_Work_Capability_Assessment

 

- “If you move to Universal Credit from Employment and Support Allowance and have already been assessed as having limited capability for work you will not have to undertake the assessment again.

 

If you were in the work related activity group you will be awarded the LCW element and if you were in the support group you will be awarded the LCWRA element.”

 

This means that as [his name-redacted] has already been assessed as having LCW he shouldn’t be having supply a GP’s fit note, as these are only required at the assessment phase of a UC claim and therefore unnecessary for a UC claimant who is migrating from ESA.Please could you look into this, and if I am incorrect, please send links to the relevant legislation."

 

His work coach has replied

"it is a requirement under UC" to supply the fit note if his commitment to "intensive work seaches" is to change.

She supplied no links.

Thanks in advance to the experts :)

I've been given THE legislation, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1230/pdfs/uksi_20141230_en.pdf REGULATION 19.

He should be treated as though he's still in receipt of the previous ESA award.

How to tell the work coach this diplomatically, I will have to leave until tomorrow.

 

If anyone else has further advice, I will be keeping an eye on this thread

- I do hope this predicament and added links so far will help someone else in the future (and I hope more that they won't need to!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the Job Centre work coach to make an urgent Decision Maker (DM) referral. The DM can find out the prognosis period given under the ESA medical and that should decide when the next UC Work capability assessment is due.

 

When you have a Work Capability Assessment (WCA)for a benefit the medical professional advises a prognosis period of 1,2 or 3 years and if a DM accepts this, then a new WCA is not required for the relevant number of years.

 

The person who had the WCA might be aware of the progosis period. They can ask for a copy of the ESA WCA medical on which the DM decision was based. By phoning the ESA helpline they can get the information, if they wanted it.

 

At some point a new WCA will be required and the Job Centre Work Coach may be correct that it is due now, if the ESA prognosis period has expired. This might be why they have asked for Doctors sick notes.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your best bet to sort this out is a duel approach;

 

1, lodge a complaint - very important this

 

2, keep referring them to Transitional Protection reg 19 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1230/contents/made

 

This thread has a good letter linked in it. https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/12266/

 

Also every time they try and do something not consistent with TP Reg 19 keep lodging new complaints for each action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Transitional protection I think only applies to managed migration that DWP instigate.

 

If a claimant has a change of circumstances, that is classed as natural migration and not covered by transitional protection rules.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the advice so far :)

 

I have an update.

 

I phoned the UC helpline today (Friday)

- my friend was with me.

 

I set out the case to the UC person who answered.

 

They agreed that it certainly sounded like no fit note was required,

 

HOWEVER...my friend is on the "new style UC" which is pretty much all online and was a different helpline number.

 

UC person gave me the number and transferred me.

 

Half an hour waiting to be answered first time round, almost the same this time round...

 

New UC person again was very nice.

I quoted Reg 19 at them.

They took all the details etc.

 

They said that friend would likely need to have another WCA under UC, and I said that's fair enough, as he's had WCAs under ESA, so why can't they take the fact he's already on ESA as proof of LCW for UC??

They went to speak to a manager.

 

When they came back they said that they'd looked into my friend's journal and claim and found that although ESA had been stopped on the day that the UC claim started, an important form that requests his ESA 'file' for a UC claim HAD NOT been sent by the JC , so UC phone person requested it for them.

 

They said that at this stage it would be best if my friend obtained a fit note, as he needs to comply with the things set out in his journal.

 

After around 90 mins on the phone,

we hadn't 'won' the fit note issue,

but I was glad that SOMETHING (that form) had been actioned and that things were a little more clear (for me, at least).

My friend & I parted ways shortly after.

 

I then received a message from him,

that his journal had been updated.

 

It was updated by the UC helpline person.

 

The message from them on the journal said that [NAME REDACTED: his case manager = NOT his work coach] will be reviewing his case AND the issues, and will be contacting him

[DATE REDACTED: date after the weekend] with information...!!

I am tentatively holding my breath in the hope that the fit note issue is clarified...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Confused 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/new-style-employment-and-support-allowance

 

This is a National Insurance contribution based benefit that is paid for up to 365 days. At the end of 365 days, if the person still needed benefits they would have to transfer onto UC Full Service. By the end of 2018 all of the UK should be UC full service. You can check online for UC full service roll out dates to job centres.

 

In regard to WCA medical, my understanding is that if the previous ESA medical is still within the prognosis period, then ESA live service would just accept the current WCA details. If the prognosis period runs out during the 365 days of this new style ESA, then a new WCA is arranged at that point.

 

The point of the prognosis period if accepted by DWP, is that this is the time period it is accepted the benefit claimant will be unfit for work. If someone is incorrectly referred for another WCA, get hold of the previous WCA decision and how long the prognosis period is. If the matter is then referred to a Decision Maker, they are most likely to say that a new WCA is not required until the prognosis period runs out.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...