Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st/Moony PAP Letter of Claim - old BOS OD - now intrum/resolvecall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

I've received a letter from Moon Beever Solicitors on behalf of 1st Credit (Finance) Limited for an outstanding Halifax debt of £2,254.03

 

Letter reads as follows

 

"We are instructed on behalf of 1st Credit (Finance) Limited of The Omnibus Building, Lesbourne Road, Reigate, RH2 7JP.

This letter is sent in compliance with the Pre-Action Protocol on Debt Claims ("the Protocol").

It is part of the requirements of the Protocol that we refer you to Annex 1 of the same and supply you with an information sheet and reply form. A copy of Annex 1 and those documents are provided with this letter.

 

Our client has a claim for monies owed on your Bank Of Scotland Plc Bank account reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, which was opened on or around 3rd July 2006 ("the Agreement").

 

The account was assigned to our client on 18th November 2013 and a notice of assignment was sent to you on 10th August 2015 confirming our client as the new legal owner.

 

The sums owed to Bank Of Scotland Plc must now be paid to our client"

 

It then goes on to say that I can request a written copy of the agreement (if applicable) which the client will request from the original creditor and send to me upon receipt.

As well as providing as reply form and a income/outgoing form

 

I had some bad credit problems in the past and I understood that they were now statute barred.

This debt doesn't appear on my credit report, which I check every month after being a victim of identity theft.

 

I'm not sure what to do next, so any advice will be gratefully received.

 

Thanks,

 

Al

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you paid or acknowledged the Debt within the last six years.

 

If you have not paid or ack the debt it is Statute Barred which means the debt is still there but they cannot take court action to recover debt.

 

They can ask you pay but they cannot harrass you when you have advised them it is SB.

 

Some of the more knowledgeable members will you advise you

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its after 6 years since the default date with no payments/ack's - happy days.

is it re a credit card?

(ps, i know it shouldn't go from the def date, but as has been seen some creds do argue that. and its been in issue in the courts recently apparently)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, things may be different re a current a/c, depending on its circumstances.

did they default it. (seems so, in which case the same wld apply. over 6 years since, happy days)

wait see what the guys input also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the number is not 16 digits its not a card

have you moved since taking this OD out

and are HBOS aware of your current adddress

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you MUST reply oneway or the other

else by default you'll get a backdoor CCJ filed to an old address

that's what the phishing letters are about that you've probably had already.

 

HBOS has 24/7 phonebanking

go ring them now and ask last payment date.

 

you really should never run away from debts in the current climate

its getting even easier for debt buyers to get backdoor CCJ's on mostly any consumer debt now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just got off the phone with HBOS and according to their records the following are linked to me;

 

A card cash account which had a balance added to it of £50.93 on 25/6/2015 (I thought this had been closed a long time ago, so this is a bonus)

 

A current account (which the letter from 1st Credit/Moon Beever is referring to) which according to HBOS was closed on 17/09/2011.

 

The person I spoke to couldn't see any notes about it being assigned to a debt collection agency,

i'm not sure where 1st credit have got the date 18/11/2013 as assignment to them from HBOS.

There was also no notes about the balance at point of closure or a last payment date.

 

They couldn't send me out any information,

I need to speak to Account Services in the morning and they will be able to send me out the information.

 

Where do I go from here?

 

Are 1st credt/Moon just phising on a old SB debt,

hoping that i'll get scared and pay up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its rare for a DCA to go straight in with a PAP letter

have you never received nowt else on this before now?

its statute barred then regardless.

forget the pap forms

send them our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can still go for a backdoor CCJ regardless to if its SB

as nothing is ever checked no human is ever involved in a default judgement it rubberstamped.

which is why its vitally important to always tell your creditors of an address change.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its the only one there bar the Scottish one!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the owner

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've just got off the phone with HBOS account services who then put me through their collections department 

who confirmed to me that the account in question was closed by them in 2010 and not 2011.

there was a payment made to it on 25/06/2012 (not sure who that was from, it wasn't from me).

They then confirmed that they sold the debt to 1st credit in November 2013.

As I've never acknowledged the debt or made a payment myself

should I send the SB letter or because there was a payment made in 2012 is debt still in force?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the payment wasn't made by you

then its not authorised by you in writing and doesn't count.

 

didn't have any debt management plans with anyone did you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...