Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving. The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but  does it does not provide a defence. But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did. As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked. In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive. The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrived just over 27 hours later


Isiris
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just looking for some advice on this one please.

 

We flew to Hong Kong stopping over in Dubai for 2 hours before connecting onwards to HK. Our flight was delayed in landing due to fog. We landed at 9.26 and our flight was due to leave at 9:55

 

When we landed, there was emirates staff fast tracking people flying to Auckland and Melbourne through the gates. Upon research today, both these flights were scheduled to leave at 10:10

 

We proceeded to the gate to find the gate closed and deserted and thought the plane had left. Upon further research, the plane took off at 11:01

 

We went to customer support and there was 8 in our party.

2 had travelled business and we were economy.

 

We were told economy was full but there was space in business but would cost us £1200 to upgrade.

This was on a flight at 7:10 that evening.

 

We said no as we were all travelling together and some couldnt afford it

we ended up all flying out on the 3:15 am flight.

This resulted in us arriving in Hong Kong, 27 hours late.

 

We also had prepaid for our hotel and missed out on 4 rooms at £180 per night for the rooms.

 

My questions are

 

1. Do we have any for of monetary claim for the late arrival

 

2. Should Emirates have out is in business class anyway, irrelevant of us having to pay as we were the first ones chasing the space.

 

3. Can we claim for the lost hotel cost that we had already incurred.

 

Many thanks

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 passengers together

2x2 passengers together

 

Christmas day to Dubai from Manchester EK20

 

Supposed to catch EK380

 

Ended up on EK382

 

Thanks

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in the 4 passengers together travelling Economy

 

When we checked in at Manchester we were given both boarding passes for the Emirates flights from the Emirates desk.

 

The booking reference is the same for the whole journey though different boarding cards.

 

E-Ticket Number : ....

Ticket Issue Date: Thursday , August 17 Booking Ref: ..

Ticket Issue Agency : SOUTHALL TRAVEL Airline Ref : ///

 

Thats whats on the reference section from Southall Travel.

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, that’s good.

 

Did Emirates make a PA about connections during approach before landing in DXB?

They are usually very good at ensuring transfer pax make their connections, even when delayed.

I don’t quite understand how you could have missed the connection, but that’s an aside.

 

Did Emirates feed and water you during your extended layover in DXB?

 

The airline is claiming fog as the delay into DXB and I see that you were held in the arrival pattern for just over an hour which indicates traffic issues into DXB.

 

One of the concerns I have is that neither flight you were booked on were delayed enough to qualify for a compensation claim and I’d say your 27 hour delay is due to missing your connection and I’m not sure what to recommend in that respect until you clarify what happened prior to arrival in DXB and during transfer.

 

Have a look at the CAA guidelines...

 

https://www.caa.co.uk/Passengers/Resolving-travel-problems/Delays-cancellations/Delays/Long-haul-delays--compensation/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for your reply

 

No, no mention of what to do re connections except turn right when alighting the bus.

 

As I mentioned above, there was agents seeking passengers for Auckland and also for Melbourne,

both flights scheduled to leave 10 minutes after ours though ours actually departed over 1 hour late.

 

Yes, we were sent to a Hotel for approx 8 hours for a shower as we had no clothes as our bags were somewhere in DXB waiting to join our flight to HK

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, this is very strange for Emirates.

 

They KNOW who is onboard with connections and they know what seat they are in.

 

They always make announcements about transfers and are generally good at rushing people through...

 

You state the gate was closed for your HK leg,

which would be quite normal if you arrived after normal closing time

BUT your tickets are supposedly through tickets

so Emirates would have known you were going to make it, just,

and would likely have held for you,

even if only only for a few moments.

 

Is it possible you missed announcements?

Made a wrong turn in the airport that further delayed you?

 

Based on what I see so far I don’t think you have a claim for anything, TBH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to me they made an error on transfer and are blaming airline - no doubt all on mobile phones as usual and missing calls over tannoy ? seen it so many times, try claiming bet they loose? be interesting if they do not!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, not clear from original post. unless bought as a package many flights like this are split at the time of booking so the first leg undoubtedly covered but the second leg not necessarily so.

Would still be recommending looking at waht the insurance says about missed flights as that will have a lot of leverage on the airline(s)

 

The OP booked a through ticket so EU regs do apply. The debate is whether there is a claim or not.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Old Cogger you arrogance holds no boundaries does it.

Should have known your input would be useless when your first comment it to question routing from Manchester to Hong Kong.

 

For your information

the 2 travelling business have 2 properties in Dubai and travel there 8-10 times a year.

I travel frequently through DBX on business and have never missed a connection yet.

 

Please don't judge everyone by your own abilities and traits.

 

The only announcement that was made on the plane was for passengers to turn right on leaving the bus to make connections.

When we did they wete asking for customers to Aukland and Austrailia nothing about Hong Kong.

 

The two business class passengers are gold flyers with Emirates so are going to try first then see what they are offered then seek recompense pro rata

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

the connection is a point and how it was missed as calls over Tanoy would of been announced??

 

?? = question i.e. were any announced?

 

secondly when I was transiting Through Riyadh the onward flight to the Far East was delayed for 4-5 hours and we could see work being carried out on the 747 wing area, due to that flight starting from outside the EU no claim was allowed in respect of the delay element!

 

I travel to the Far East at least once a year many routes and calls to passengers by name quite regular occurance no matter which route I have taken!

 

In fact I am in the Far East responding here.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...