Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Citicard/Opus PPI Headache


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can you help me with a ppi claim I have tried to claim.

 

I had a credit card with citibank that was taken out back in around 2000.

I had ppi on there which was costing me around £30-£40 per month.

 

I had a CMC who said they could put a claim in for me, this was over 2 yrs ago.

After all this time and numerous calls they have now closed the case for the following reasons.

 

Citibank transferred my account to a bank called Opus.

This was done without me knowing until I had a statement off them

where I called them and found out that my account had been transferred to them for reasons I still don't know.

 

I owed nothing on the card and Opus refused to send me a card as they were not issuing anymore.

I can only see my account being transferred because I did't use the card for about 9 months

as didn't want to and like I said I owed nothing on it.

 

When the claim was put in and after many months,

citi said the account was now with opus and had nothing to with them now,

 

Opus said the account was with citi so the claim is against them.

This went backhand forth and nobody would take responsibility over who the claim was against,

even though I paid all ppi to citi.

 

CMC sent the claim to the ombudsman and after about another year they replied

saying there is nothing they can do and the case is closed with them.

 

Is there anything I can do as I paid all this ppi and cannot get anywhere with it at all.

 

In all the time I had the card I was self employed to

and found out lately that even though I was paying ppi

I was not covered as I wasn't employed

 

The ombudsman was told this also.

 

Can I get anywhere with this now or is it done and dusted.

 

Please help.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

what citi address did you use Canadian square/house address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recently been successful with a Citi claim and my card is younger than yours If the CMC have sent your claim to Opus they have sent it to the incorrect address. The correct address is

 

Citi cards

PO Box 4904

Worthing

 

Unfortunately everything has to be done in writing as there is no telephone number and you get no response from th email address, however they are very helpful and quite quick to resolve your claim.

 

Hope this helps

Edited by Queens_king
spelling
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to do it properly

not just by sending a speculative letter

which will get a speculative response

 

 

have you all the statements??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have but not now :-/

 

 

I was thinking of sending a sar for all copies of them.

 

 

Thats why I was seeing if there was a template letter as I don't want to do it wrong.

 

 

After al the CMC messed it up for me and i'm not really wanting to follow the same route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

spreadsheet

and fos customer questionnaire

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My card was opened in 2005, all I sent was the FOS CQ as they messed me around for a SAR (probably as I am not resident in the UK now) but they dis ask for proof of change of address. I was advised that I was owed £5,100 and received the cheque 21 days later

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a letter off Canada Square, Operations

asking for name, addresses, dob and utility bill.

 

 

They are saying they cannot verify customer verification process.

I can do all this but have been asked to send all correspondence to Canada Square Operations.

 

 

I have sent the fos and the sar,

shall send this in a brief letter with their reference or is there another way of doing it.

Just feel as if i'm going to be messed around by them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the same with my complaint but I never used a DSAR request as they played around and after ten weeks (note my location, hence the delays) of back and forth gave up the DSAR and sent only the CQC from the FOS web site to the Worthing address.

 

Had to prove where I was living when I took the card out and where I was living when I made the complaint.

 

Canada Square is the DSAR address so they will require verification that it is you they will be sending the DSAR to. If you have moved since you opened the account it may be wise to advise them of the address where you were living when you opened it, it could save you a lot of time if found in your favour.

 

Dear sir or madam

 

I opened the account on xx-xxx-xxxx date and was living at xxx xxxxxx street, somewhere

 

My current address is as per the letter xxx, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wherever.

 

I enclose the following docs as proof of Identity

.....two or three documents with current address

 

Hope this helps

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just had a letter back off Canada Square Operations.

 

They are saying they are no longer the owner of the account and send all correspondence to Opus who now have the account. They have given me their address and customer services number. They have also said they have forwarded my complaint to them where they will investigate accordingly.

 

I've been down this street before where Opus say it is nothing to do with them and to contact Citi. Its all back and forth and neither of them helping at all.

 

I'm probably totally wrong but I paid all the ppi to citi and opus only took on the account once I stopped using it as citi said it came dormant, so surely citi are the people I talk to.

 

I haven't heard back off them about the SAR I sent in, so I assume that is still being looked at.

 

Please help as I haven't a clue where to go with this now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sounds like the same situation I had with an old Egg card. Barclays bought my account from Egg. A few months ago I reclaimed the PPI through Barclays, they didn't argue, I got £184 back.

I've just done Citi too. Got £1700 back from around 15 years ago. It should have been around £3900 but the ex wife got in first and they mistakenly refunded one of the accounts in full to her. Trying to pursue that one now but there are no examples around to base an argument on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I had a citibank credit card that was transferred to Opus back around 2010

I have tried for years to claim back the PPI I had been paying on the card for around 12 years.

This amounted to around £5000 plus interest.

 

Citibank totally refused to look at it as they passed the account to Opus as we didnt use the card for about the last 10 months before they transferred it.

 

When they transferred the card there was an outstanding amount of around £150 which was cleared over a few months.

Opus have declined any claim on the PPI as they have said the account was closed when they took it over from Citibank.

 

I am now in a position where neither of them will look at it at all and the ombudsman has said they can do nothing about it.

This was a response from over 12 months ago.

 

What can I do to claim back the PPI as I can't seem to get anywhere with it?

 

I took the card out back in 1998 and from 2000 I was self employed from then until now and learned that PPI does not cover self employed people.

 

Please can you advise if there is anything I can do or is this a lost cause

 

Look forward to hearing from you and appreciate you looking at a this me

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay

 

I sent a SAR a few years ago and received all the statements for time I had the card with Citicards.

 

The problem I'm up against is both of them keep saying its the others responsibility and neither of them will budge on it.

 

It did go to the ombudsman who's response was until one of them takes responsibility there is nothing they can do. I was like like, really???

 

I can send a SAR again to citicard and get the info sent out again but really haven't a clue what else I can do as I get the door shut by both companies

 

Also I learned lately that Opus took on the account when it was closed and say as it was closed when they took it over all responsibility goes back to Citicard.

 

Citicard just keep saying the account is now with Opus and i keep going round in circles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...