Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and My Various Benefit Claims and issues


Jmulv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ingeus etc were useless

PWP has only been a combination of petty, vindictive **** who have failed to bully me or break me. They seem to agree the schemes are useless but one dared blame for not taking advantage of the schemes but he blames the jnemoyrd for being unemployed which seems to be the latest tactic, the PWP even try to tell the unemployed what to spend their money on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 695
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

what do yous all think of these changes that these Tory want to bring in been forced to take zero hours contracts jobs?

do yous agree or do u not agree with these changes?

 

for me personal i dont see why people should be told to take zero hour contract as u could be skint or have a good wage but more likely will be skint.

 

its just another money saving dwp etc scheme instead of helping the unemployed its attack after attack.

 

i dont want to be signing on i want to be in a full time job going to work and coming home and getting a good wage at the end of the week rather than sitting applying for jobs going to wp jcp getting the threat of sanction over my head and waiting 2 weeks for jsa money that it helps but skint within the next day or so

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most of us that want some quality of life want to be working. I was earning £30k a year, 2 holidays a year, eating our regularly, out with friends 2-3 times a week and in one swoop all gone. Now I fester at home unable apart from once a month to see friends or go on holiday - I even had to sell my car. Since redundancy it has been all downhill and the only saving grace is I haveno mortgage as I rent and can claim HB and don't have a partner or children. I also got debt free with my redundancy money. Some people are content on benefits because they have no aspirations to better themselves or havenever had a previously good way of life whereas some of us have and have lost it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also agreen with boom that it is attack after attack and generally making jobseekers lives a misery for a paltry £70 a week which most of us have paid in over many years so in effect it is OUR MONEY not the governments. We are all tarred with the same brush and that is what is unfair. 25 year old, never worked, never paid taxes etc £72.40pw. 39 year old, 19 years tax and NI and under stress daily = £72.40pw - sickening

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeh attack after attack i get like just over £50 a week and yet u get attack for that when u have people companies avoiding taxes yet its like aww we will get them yeh in what like 1000 year time thats money that would help the country but yet they go for the poor who get job centre cash and they are not gonna get much money from us that will get the country cash all i say is go for the people who own millions of cash not the poor!

 

i have had a job but only through a training course years ago for 3 and a half months and i enjoyed it and fought maybe get another job as i have worked now but years later i am struggling for work and it stresses me out

 

and all u get from non jobseekers is u dont want to work u would rather just get cash from the job centre and enjoy life when i only sign on to pay things and get me food etc and look for work and if i did not want to work i wouldnt go on to jsa as i would not waste money but i really want work and am sure everybody wants to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone with any morals wants to work, what they don't want to do, and rightly so is after paying for travel etc earn the same or less than they get on benefits. Why would you work somewhere with no room for development for the same or less than you get on benefits? Some would say "at least you are working" I would say "No, it is slave labour for 20+ hours a week for the same as I get for signing on plus I am liable for other stuff as I am working so I am worse off by a mile"

 

After my HB pays my rent and I pay my utilities and food I am left withabout £10 a week for myself - brilliant when you used to clear around £2,000p/m and be left with around £900 of it after bills were paid and yest some still think we live an easy life - we don't, we only do this because we need the poxy JSA pennies to keep us alive. As I have said before and as my parents said to me, if they could give me the £70pw they wouldn't want me anywhere near the JC or WP

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeh i have said this to my adviser i dont want to work for the same or less than my benefit as i dont see why when u could sign on and get the same cash for not working.

 

yeh my parents have told me if they could pay the same amount the job centre pay u then i would not let u sign on but they cant as they have things to pay and dont even have another to keep there selfs happy when they have payed bills etc

 

am sure the jcp wp dwp etc could come up with things to help the unemployed not stress them out by coming out in the news every week with a new thing scheme to force us to work or get sanctions we sign on to get help into work as they say but now it is if u sign on you do force labour thats what they are now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, by forcing people to do slave labour and sign on daily etc all the DWP is doing is giving people LESS time to job search. The simple fact is the government/DWP have not got a clue as everyone is tarred with the same brush

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeh like they always say they are there "to help u back to work" yes ok u mean forced labour/community service HELP us stop forcing us simple as that it is not hard to understand us!

 

lets sign on everyday yeh cause that means less job searching and 6months voluntary what to end up back at the start signing on and looking for work or training for a few weeks but why would u need to offer training to people who just came off a WP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a mate who is asking this course he likes its not in a college but its ila funded and he was wondering do u get paid for been there? as i dont know as i have not used an ila account

 

Generally you can use an ILA and the course will be treated like any other college course (even if the institution running the course isn't a "college" as such) provided you meet the basic availability requirements for JSA.

 

So, as long as your friend is still looking for work and the course is not considered "full time" then he's probably OK and will still get JSA. He won't likely get any extra money, though, and would have to meet his own travel costs. He would need to talk to his JSA adviser about that.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally you can use an ILA and the course will be treated like any other college course (even if the institution running the course isn't a "college" as such) provided you meet the basic availability requirements for JSA.

 

So, as long as your friend is still looking for work and the course is not considered "full time" then he's probably OK and will still get JSA. He won't likely get any extra money, though, and would have to meet his own travel costs. He would need to talk to his JSA adviser about that.

 

a will let him know as i was not sure as to how ila and going on a ila funded course when on jsa

 

its only a 5minute work from where a live and 10-15 mins for him so not really going to be bothered about travel and i might consider it so am gonna see with my adviser next week and see what they say to it cause if i will still get my jsa when on this course it would suit me and my friend as its something to add to cv and another path option in our careers

Link to post
Share on other sites

a will let him know as i was not sure as to how ila and going on a ila funded course when on jsa

 

its only a 5minute work from where a live and 10-15 mins for him so not really going to be bothered about travel and i might consider it so am gonna see with my adviser next week and see what they say to it cause if i will still get my jsa when on this course it would suit me and my friend as its something to add to cv and another path option in our careers

 

Note to our non-Scottish friends - ILA is an "Individual Learning Account" which is available to people in Scotland who are on benefits or low incomes. It offers funds, paid directly to the college or other institution, to such people in order to help them fund training courses. Several years ago I used one to fund my Microsoft Certified Professional qualification, for example. At that time, the max amount available for most courses was about £250.

 

Right, anyhow, yes, a course of a few hours per week is normally fine for JSA, but you do need to declare it to your adviser before you start.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note to our non-Scottish friends - ILA is an "Individual Learning Account" which is available to people in Scotland who are on benefits or low incomes. It offers funds, paid directly to the college or other institution, to such people in order to help them fund training courses. Several years ago I used one to fund my Microsoft Certified Professional qualification, for example. At that time, the max amount available for most courses was about £250.

 

Right, anyhow, yes, a course of a few hours per week is normally fine for JSA, but you do need to declare it to your adviser before you start.

 

do england get any sort of things like ila in scotland? ye it is handy to pay for courses

 

ye of course i will speak to the adviser first about it and do u know how many hours a week u can do the course without it affecting your benefit ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there's a direct English/Welsh/NI equivalent of the ILA - it was set up by the Scottish Government several years ago. Education funding in Scotland is dealt with by Holyrood, not London.

 

When I was claiming it was 16 hours per week max that you could do, but I think the rules are more complex now and I don't know exactly what they are. In general, if the organisation offering the course says it is "full time" study then you couldn't claim JSA. But if it's "part time" then you quite possibly can claim JSA while you study as long as you still sign on, look for jobs, and do whatever else the Jobcentre expects you to do.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there's a direct English/Welsh/NI equivalent of the ILA - it was set up by the Scottish Government several years ago. Education funding in Scotland is dealt with by Holyrood, not London.

 

When I was claiming it was 16 hours per week max that you could do, but I think the rules are more complex now and I don't know exactly what they are. In general, if the organisation offering the course says it is "full time" study then you couldn't claim JSA. But if it's "part time" then you quite possibly can claim JSA while you study as long as you still sign on, look for jobs, and do whatever else the Jobcentre expects you to do.

 

aww i see i was not sure if us had any things like ila in scotland .

i guess if u go to a course that is not in a college that ila have funded do u get any money from the place u go to? if u have to sign off if the course is "full time"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww i see i was not sure if us had any things like ila in scotland .

i guess if u go to a course that is not in a college that ila have funded do u get any money from the place u go to? if u have to sign off if the course is "full time"?

 

In most cases, you can't claim JSA (or other such benefits like ESA) if you are a full time student. There might be a few exceptions if you are disabled or have young children, I can't recall.

 

My course was three hours per day, three days a week for a total of nine hours per week and my JSA adviser said that was OK and I got full JSA. But that was years ago now - the rules may well have changed. Normally, ILA just pays your tuition fees, there's no extra money you can receive yourself.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeh i have said this to my adviser i dont want to work for the same or less than my benefit as i dont see why when u could sign on and get the same cash for not working.

 

yeh my parents have told me if they could pay the same amount the job centre pay u then i would not let u sign on but they cant as they have things to pay and dont even have another to keep there selfs happy when they have payed bills etc

 

am sure the jcp wp dwp etc could come up with things to help the unemployed not stress them out by coming out in the news every week with a new thing scheme to force us to work or get sanctions we sign on to get help into work as they say but now it is if u sign on you do force labour thats what they are now!

Their attitude based on experience is it's better to be working even if it's only a few hours and even if it's not in the chosen areas of work you seek

Plus one PWP thinks the schemes are excellent and it's the Jobseeker's fault for being unemployed and the jobseeker whom didn't take advantage. Plus they are trying to tell Jobseeker's what to spend their money on

I know a manager who got treated like she wasn't interested I working so that may be a typical attitude in the local sanction centre

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a p60 form letter about tax and the amount is this just how much I got past year and what was taxed ?

 

Yes. Standard form for you to keep. Nothing to worry about.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

had my weekly signing today and the job center was full of us. cant see this working if we have to sign on daily .

 

downstairs they had a sign anyone here for the marks and spencers interviews so after me being 1 of over 30 people that had a group interview over a month ago they now want to get more people in to do the 6 weeks non paid training lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well of course they do, it is training but in fact it isn't - there are NO JOBS at the end of it, it is to fool people in to thinking there is but at the same time getting them to workfor nothing for a large company so they have stuff done before the summer season and they can sack paid staff and get the work done for nothing. Non paid training LOL! i HAVE HEARD IT ALL NOW!!!! It is not training, it is MWA!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what i thought. when i went to the group interview they had us sitting round 6 tables and it took 2 hours and they said they had another group before us.

 

so glad i did not get through that stage because then 6 weeks full hours working with no pay only to get an interview is taking the pee.

 

also at the jobcenter they are training floor walkers to sign people on now lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well of course they do, it is training but in fact it isn't - there are NO JOBS at the end of it, it is to fool people in to thinking there is but at the same time getting them to workfor nothing for a large company so they have stuff done before the summer season and they can sack paid staff and get the work done for nothing. Non paid training LOL! i HAVE HEARD IT ALL NOW!!!! It is not training, it is MWA!

 

Have to agree, more or less, although I'm not sure it's a deliberate plan to get rid of paid staff - I think it's more opportunistic than anything else. But yeah, unpaid training? In the vague hope that there might, possibly, be a job at the end of it? The absurdity is burning me, I tell you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what i thought. when i went to the group interview they had us sitting round 6 tables and it took 2 hours and they said they had another group before us.

 

so glad i did not get through that stage because then 6 weeks full hours working with no pay only to get an interview is taking the pee.

 

also at the jobcenter they are training floor walkers to sign people on now lol

 

 

training floor walkers to sign people on? i have heard it all now lol!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...