Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JC International/Moriartry law Talk Talk account claim


andrew73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning all

 

On 16.09.2017 i have received a claim form from county court business centre

 

Issue date 13.09.2017

Particulars of claim

The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with Talk Talk Limited dated 25.03.2010 which was assigned to the claimant on the 26.03.2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 26.03.2014 and which is now all due and payable.

The defendant agreed to pay monthly installments under account number 100326xxxx but has failed to do so.

And the claimant claims the sum of £423.54

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to S.69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to £33.88.

Amount claimed 457.42

Court fee 35

Legal representative costs 50

Total amount 542.42

 

On 18.09.2017 i receive the following letter from Moriarty law:

 

Date 15.09.2017

Dear Mrxxxxx

Re: JC International Acquisitions LLC vs Mr. A xxxxx in the Northampton County Court

 

Following our earlier letters regarding the above outstanding balance we have now issued proceedings in the County Court at Northampton to effect repayment of this debt.

You will shortly receive a County Court Claim from Northampton County Court along with an information pack containing details on how to respond.

It is still not too late to amicable resolve this matter and therefore please call our offices within 14 days.

Alternative you may write to us at the above address or email within 14 days.

 

Based on the particulars of the claim should i defend?

Looking at the dates is this a statue barred debt?

Should have they sent me the letter before the claim form and not after?

What is the best way to go forward?

I haven't yet acknowledged the claim on the website

 

Many thanks

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew and Welcome to CAG

 

If you could complete all the details in the following link and copy and paste the Qs and your response back here so we have all the details in one post.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant JC International Acquisition

 

Date of issue – 13.09.2017

 

What is the claim for – Particulars of claim

The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with Talk Talk Limited dated 25.03.2010 which was assigned to the claimant on the 26.03.2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 26.03.2014 and which is now all due and payable.

The defendant agreed to pay monthly installments under account number 100326xxxx but has failed to do so.

And the claimant claims the sum of £423.54

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to S.69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to £33.88.

 

What is the value of the claim? £542.42

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? broadband

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? after 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser issued the claim

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Unsure

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Unsure

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Unsure

 

Why did you cease payments? breakdown in relationship move out payments not made but account still in my name

 

What was the date of your last payment? Unsure, phoned the bank today and they cannot find any details regarding direct debits to talk talk, very confused at this point

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? No

 

Apologies for the vague answers i genuinely don`t remember.

 

Thank you

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks....

 

I would always advocate defending all claims of this type...as once the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose all documents..it simply cant comply and end up discontinuing the claim.

 

So your next task...refer to my earlier link.....you need to send a CPR 31.14 request to the claimants solicitors.....instructions are contained within the template.

 

You also need to acknowledge service of this claim...you have 19 days from and including the date on the claim form..state defend all..you then have a further 14 days to submit your defence...so 33 days in total.

 

You can acknowledge service on line... the instructions are contained in the claim pack.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice

I take it that i need to addres the CPR 31.14 to JC international and not to Moriartry law, although their adress is on the claim but not their name. The claimant is Jc international. Do i need to send a £1 standing order with the CPR?

Also when shoud i submit my acknolegment online, asap or wait towards the end of 19 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the CPR 31.14 is free to send..it goes to the address named in the box to send documents.Take your time to acknowledge no rush as long as you complete it on time and use that time to read other similar threads from the same claimant and same type of claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the CPR 31.14 is free to send..it goes to the address named in the box to send documents.Take your time to acknowledge no rush as long as you complete it on time and use that time to read other similar threads from the same claimant and same type of claim.

I have sent the CPR 31.14 yestarday 25.09.2017 recorded delivery( letter was recived today) and acknowledged the claim online. Im just waiting now for a response. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt you will get any...keep your eye on your defence date and start looking at other similar threads with defences.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Andy

If i got my days right the deadline for the defence is 16.10.

 

Do i have to whait until this date to submit the defence or can i do it before?

 

Part of the evidence can i upload the cpr request and the post office receipt with the tracking number showing the cpr request was received?

Could you help with drafting the defence or is there a template i can use?

Should i e-mail the solicitors remainding them about the cpr request?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Friday the 13th your defence is due...and no you dont need to wait you can submit anytime now.

 

No you dont chase or issue reminders.

 

You dont submit evidence with a defence...thats for later next stage.

 

Plenty of similar defences contained in the Financial Legal Success forum.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I`m about to use as my defence.

Is this gone be ok?

 

Particulars of claim

The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with Talk Talk Limited dated 25.03.2010 which was assigned to the claimant on the 26.03.2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 26.03.2014 and which is now all due and payable.

The defendant agreed to pay monthly installments under account number 100326xxxx but has failed to do so.

And the claimant claims the sum of £423.54

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to S.69 county courticon act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to £33.88.

 

What is the value of the claim? £542.42

 

Defence

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.The claimant's’ particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16.2 The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2.The claim is denied.I am unaware of what debt the claimant refers to.I have requested information pertaining to the claimants claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request sent on 25.09.2017 and wich the claimant received it on the 26.09.2017

 

The claimant has failed to respond.

 

3.The claim is denied the Claimant has not served a Notice of Assignment pursuant to the law of property act 1925 and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4.Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a few tweaks and additions ..the above is okay.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont submit the particulars...just the defence.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Any news Andrew?

 

I don't mean to hijack this thread... but I'm in a similar position.. and just had an update.

 

  • Claim amount: £352.76
  • CPR 31.14 & CCA letter sent 21/09/2017, both unacknowledged
  • Defence filed 09/10/2017
  • Today, 28/10/2017 - received a letter Moriarty Law acknowledging the receipt of the Defence filed to the court and confirming that they are proceeding with the claim.

 

So.... I don't think the OP should be hopeful at this stage. It seems that claims previously would have been dropped at this point, but it doesn't look so likely? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mean to hijack this thread... but I'm in a similar position.. and just had an update.

 

  • Claim amount: £352.76
  • CPR 31.14 & CCA letter sent 21/09/2017, both unacknowledged
  • Defence filed 09/10/2017
  • Today, 28/10/2017 - received a letter Moriarty Law acknowledging the receipt of the Defence filed to the court and confirming that they are proceeding with the claim.

 

So.... I don't think the OP should be hopeful at this stage. It seems that claims previously would have been dropped at this point, but it doesn't look so likely? :???:

 

go start a new thread of your OWN PLEASE

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today i got a letter from Moriarty Law acknowledging the receipt of the Defence filed to the court and confirming that they are proceeding with the claim. So what next?

Thank you

 

there are 100's of claims here already from MMF/JC...

 

go read them

 

CAG is self help too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go start a new thread of your OWN PLEASE

 

You are missing the point of my response, I wasn't seeking support on this thread - I was sharing that the tone seems to have changed - which is helpful to those that want to help and the OP.

 

Honestly, if you can't be helpful.. Why post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well no the tune has not changed

we don't know what defence you filed

to get that response

and anyway

a claimant dog always says they are going to continue its not for them to decide anyway...

they've never said any different.

 

there are no examples that claims have been dropped immediately by them once a defence is filed...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im now going to wait for a letter from either the court or Moriarty. I dont think there is anything i can do

Thank you

 

go read the letter from the court Andrew

it tells you exactly...don't speculate upon whats correct.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...