Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who would know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes in those days. Sorry not to.be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help..scared confused and worried about council tax not being included in DRO


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2507 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For years I have been struggling with debt but I got in contact with payplan and applied for a DRO.

All the paperwork was set up with all my debts on. Council tax is with Marstons.

 

I then received a letter from Rundles saying they were recovering council tax. I thought the council and changed agents and now everything was with Rundles. I informed payplan and they amended the paper work. I was just about to pay the £90 fee when last week while I was in bed asleep after a nightshift. An Enforcement guy...tapped on the front door and walked in scaring the life outta my partner who was in the living room.

 

He demanded that I pay £420 or he would take my living room items away (tv dvd player units ect)

Tried to explain that I was paying my DRO fee at end of week.

 

He was having none of it. I was scared and shaken up...I did not receive notice that he was coming.

I didn't have the cash and he was adamant he was not leaving till I paid £420 or take my goods.

 

I made some calls and manged to get about a months wages from my boss.( Agreement from boss that I pay from my wages straightaway which means at the moment i don't have money coming in to live on)

 

Anyway I paid him and got a receipt. He was now arranging a payment plan for the rest. I told him I couldn't afford anything but he was insistent...All I wanted to do was to get him outta my house so I agreed to 20 a week. He made me sign what I thought was the payment plan but in fact was a control of goods I later noticed after he left.

 

He also left an envelope on table which had inside a notice of attendance letter dated that same day in pen with a stamped date of the warrant for the following day.

 

I got back k in touch with payplan who advised me that now that I had signed a control of goods order the council tax can not be included in the DRO. I am mortified as council tax is the main debt.

 

I am now ready to pay the fee but holding back as I don't know what to do or where I stand. Oh and to add it,2 days ago I've received a letter from Marstons warning of a notice of attendance... Now I thought everything was with Rundles. I have checked the reference numbers and it's all from different years.

 

Confused and scared is not the word!!! I don't know what to do. I am finally facing my debts and this happens a week before my DRO is finalised :???:

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that get in touch with the council the tax is owed to for full details of liability orders they have obtained.

 

Before an enforcement agent visits, you should have had notice of enforcement giving you 7 days notice of attendance. Have you received any letters ?

 

Have you moved to a different address and the tax relates to a previous address ? Did the council/ enforcement agent know your new address to send any letters ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I never received a letter giving me 7 days notice. He gave that to me on the day....and the warrant date stamp on the letter is dated for the day after he came.

 

yes I moved nearly 2 years ago and they had my new address. I am phoning the council late. I have checked online all the liability orders. I just need to know who has what between Marstons and Rundles.

 

Can I ask the council to take the Debt back so it can be included in my DRO?

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Anyway I paid him and got a receipt. He was now arranging a payment plan for the rest. I told him I couldn't afford anything but he was insistent...All I wanted to do was to get him outta my house so I agreed to 20 a week. He made me sign what I thought was the payment plan but in fact was a control of goods I later noticed after he left.

 

He also left an envelope on table which had inside a notice of attendance letter dated that same day in pen with a stamped date of the warrant for the following day.

 

I got back k in touch with payplan who advised me that now that I had signed a control of goods order the council tax can not be included in the DRO. I am mortified as council tax is the main debt.

 

I am now ready to pay the fee but holding back as I don't know what to do or where I stand. Oh and to add it, 2 days ago I've received a letter from Marstons warning of a notice of attendance... Now I thought everything was with Rundles. I have checked the reference numbers and it's all from different years.

 

Confused and scared is not the word!!! I don't know what to do. I am finally facing my debts and this happens a week before my DRO is finalised :???:

 

What you need to be doing is to speak with the council to ascertain how much you owe in council tax arrears and for which year.

 

The Controlled Goods Agreemement almost certainly complicates matters in relation to that particular DRO but a lot depends on what items have been listed on the form and how much remains to be paid. If you could post back with details that would greatly assist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did not send notice of enforcement, what can be done about this ? Surely if this has happened, the controlled goods agreement is not valid and the £235 enforcement fee is not due.

 

These notices of enforcement should be required to be sent by recorded delivery or personally served.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did not send notice of enforcement, what can be done about this ? Surely if this has happened, the controlled goods agreement is not valid and the £235 enforcement fee is not due.

 

These notices of enforcement should be required to be sent by recorded delivery or personally served.

 

It would be extraordinarily difficult for a person to prove that they had not received a Notice of Enforcement. Under the Limitations Act, a document is deemed served unless the contrary can be PROVED.

 

The regulations outlining the serving of the Notice of Enforcement do not provide for recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

documents redacted and merged for you

you should not post pers info in the open forum

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original total owed was £2225

Now Rundles say i owe them £1683 thats the control goods order and minus the £420 already paid. Been told this might not be included in the DRO.

Marstons say i owe £1120 (see attached documents)

so the the new total is £2803

 

If i speak to the council today do you think they will be able to take the debt off the baillifs so i can include it all???

Payment plan i agreed to pay back that day cant be done, only agreed it to get the guy out of my house.

 

Isnt the fact the notice of attendance was given to me on the same day and also has "enforce warrant from 6am" stamped for the next day mean its not been done properly??? im confused..

marstons.pdf

Council Tax summary.pdf

Paid Rundles.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debts should ordinarily be a qualifying debt as they have become due in full (otherwise a liability order would not have been issued). For a DRO it falls under s46.13 of the insolvency manual https://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/technicalmanual/Ch37-48/chapter46/Part%201/Part%201.htm)

 

If the insolvency service take a Controlled Goods Arrangement to be a secured debt then it cannot however be included in a DRO, an exception to the normal rules. A secured debt is not a qualifying debt for the purposes of a DRO as per s46.9 of the manual https://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/technicalmanual/Ch37-48/chapter46/Part%201/Part%201.htm)

 

The manual does confirm (surprisingly) that there is no definition of 'secured' in the relevant legislation however I would see no obvious reason where you could argue a Controlled Goods Arrangement wouldn't be regarded as securing the debt. The Controlled Goods Arrangement will only secure the particular debt the agent was acting for at that time.

 

Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed dro bad idea

I bet most of the op's other debts are with DCA's and unenforceable anyway!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...