Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest/Reston claimform - old Littlewoods CAT debt - statute barred?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening Everyone,

Can someone just walk me through a Claim Form that I have received today.

 

Reston Solicitors on Behalf of Capquest.

 

Very Old Debt SB Sept 2015 16-8-2011,

 

sent one pound postal order to get Credit Agreement.

12-9-2011 sent letter asking for money back as they didn't supply Agreement and kept money to take off debt.

 

Capquest over the years,

have sent random begging letters with big discount.

Have not replied or entered into conversation by phone or letter.

 

28-3-2017 had letter from Reston Sol, threatening court. 4-4-2017

sent SB Letter

 

7-5-2017 had Claim Form.

Will defend as SB,

 

can someone just give me a quick guide on correct procedure.

 

Many thanks Have just edited it into separate lines but goes back to this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If youre 100% sure its SB, just send the SB defence through MCOL.

 

Who are restons clients?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you fill this out please

so's we have all the correct info to properly advise you

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Capquest

Date of issue – . 2-5-2017

 

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS PAYMENT OF THE OVERDUE BALANCE DUE FROM THE DEFENDANT UNDER A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEFENDENT AND LITTLEWOODS DATED 8-10-2001 AND ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT 1-10-2006

 

What is the value of the claim? 560.00

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? catalogue

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? BEFORE

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. CAPQUEST DEBT BUYER

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? MANY YEARS AGO

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? MANY YEARS AGO

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? IN SERIOUS DEBT PROBLEM

 

What was the date of your last payment? 5-9-2009

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon?

YES PAID A POUND FOR A FEW YEARS

- THEN FOUND THIS SITE AND SENT CCA WHICH THEY COULD NOT PROVIDE AND KEPT THE POUND FOR IT AND PAID IT INTO THE BALANCE OWING ON 18-8-2011 NO PAYMENT SINCE.

 

As I have a clear SB defence,

what is the best course now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please check the name of the claimant

 

 

and is that the full particulars of claim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CCA and SB means theyre on to a loser and they know it. Theyre simply trying their luck.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical trick of the unscrupulous-using the £1 from the CCA request against the debt thus appearing to extend the Limitations Act. Did Capquest return your £1?

 

NO

 

can you please check the name of the claimant

 

and is that the full particulars of claim?

 

sorry, yes Capquest

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that the full particulars of claim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote Originally Posted by lookinforinfo

Typical trick of the unscrupulous-using the £1 from the CCA Request against the debt thus appearing to extend the Limitations Act. Did Capquest return your £1?

 

NO

 

Interesting. Is this a new crooked ploy? They have put your CCA request against your debt and not sent you the requested info. So their argument could be that there was no CCA request[which is why they didn't send the data plus it gets them out of not being able to take you to Court for them being in default ] and the £1 payment was done by you thus acknowledging the debt and extending the Limitation period. I note that you were quite clear about the date you sent the postal order so I am assuming that you have some kind of proof still just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 11 please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still have a copy of the letter with the Post Office receipt clipped to it.

 

Wow you are a bigger hoarder than I am. Well done. That should really scotch them if they are trying to pull a fast one. Or attempting to pervert the course of Justice as a Judge might put it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the important cases which make it clear that mentioning an account in correspondence ( eg a section 77/78 request ) while at the same time not admitting the debt does not count as acknowledgement : Good v Parry, Surrendra Overseas v Shri Lanka, Re Flynn .

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it cannot

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Making a payment off a debt however small the amount would surely be an acknowledgement of the debt.

 

 

As far as I can see the creditor has not admitted receiving the CCA request nor provided Blueboy1 with the legal requirements of the CCA so on the face of it Blueboy has made a payment off the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The statuary fee should not be used as payment to any balance..its a legal requirement to pay the fee of £1...should any claimant argue that a payment of £1 was made and therefore acknowledgement made...counter that they are in default and not provided and that payment was made for this request (provide copies of the request as evidence)

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disregard the CCA £1

 

When was the last time you paid anything off the debt?

If that's within 6 yes the rest is immaterial.

 

You need to back the claim and get CCA/CPR running asap

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow so its really just that.

 

restons are getting rather skimpy with their pocs

must be cause we keep winning on CCA/CPR issues....:lol:

 

so you say your last payment was sept 09?

regardless to the CCA £1 debacle?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Afternoon Guys, just looked online, and my defence was received on 8/5/2017. There is nothing else listed. It is well past the 28 days, so does that mean Restons have not continued with the Claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...