Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC PCN failing to display a blue badge - Onyx retail park, Wath upon Dearne


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi really need some advice,

 

I'm a support worker to the disabled,

I'd taken a client with learning disabilities and mobility out on a drive.

 

My client needed the loo,

I drove to the nearest place which happened to be on private land.

 

The sign as you enter says.

Private parking read terms and conditions.

 

i drove straight to the disability bays.

The little signs at the front of the bay just says disabled parking,

I took him to the loo, came out to a penalty notice.

 

I even spoke to the attendant and he could clearly see my client was disabled.

 

I appealed it,

they wanted to see a copy of his blue badge,

well I then got told he didn't have one as he lived with his disabled elderly mum who has one,

 

I sent them a copy of a letter from department of work and pensions stating he claims high rate disability and high rate mobility, they rejected it,

 

the terms and conditions of parking are not displayed at these bays,

I'd have had to walk away from the shop to read them.

 

I could no way read these conditions whilst stood outside of the car.

 

I appealed to POPLA, they too have rejected it,

saying a sign is to the right,

yes in the loading bay,

not by the disability bays.

 

hy would I walk over to the loading bay to read t&cs.

 

Totally the opposite direction of where we were heading.

 

They also have not even mentioned anything about my client actually being disabled.

Because he has severe learning disabilities he's not capable of applying for a blue badge, and well if his family doesn't then I feel he's been discriminated against just for not having a blue badge.

 

Anyone know where I stand now please, I'm expecting threatening court letters etc

Edited by cjt
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sure it says penalty notice?

 

 

can you fill this out please too

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and can we see your appeal letters and their replies

[suitably redacted please to PDF]

 

 

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want a secure email to fwd it too we have one

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent the email to my daughter, so she can take off all personal details etc. Bare with me please. Ill upload asap

 

I didn't even think it was enforceable on private land:-(

 

if you want a secure email to fwd it too we have one

 

Hi could you forward on your email please if I could send you the info that way, struggling to upload. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pm sent I can redact too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly I think you've made a boo boo by identifying yourself as the driver

and

theres no such thing as a BB on private land.

they 've had you for a fool in using that as an excuse to get you to implicated yourself as the driver.

 

 

let EB comment

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely then if there is no such thing as the blue badge scheme on private land, they can't fine me fo not having one.

 

I'm willing to go to court with this, if they can't officially fine for using a scheme that doesn't apply

 

Thanks for sorting out the tthumbnails.

 

Also I read that the t &c of parking should be readable from driving into the space or on leaving the car

 

that was only achievable if I walked away from subway area to the loading area.

 

Thanks anyhow for your assistance

I'll hopefully hear from EB

Link to post
Share on other sites

your biggest mistake was writing to these cowboys without knowing the law that is applicable,

 

if you had read up on that before writing you would have realised that there isnt such a thing as disabled parking in England other than on council land.

 

So, next time dont waste a tree,

come here first and get advice on procedure,

the parking companies often get it wrong,

UKPC never get it right.

 

You may have exhausted the parking appeals process but that doesnt mean they are right.

 

This is down to contract law and as the signs at the entrance to the land are not a contract but an invitation to treat they are not relevant.

 

the lack of a contract at the space you parked in means that you are entitled to not have to consider one.

 

Even if there was a sign offering a contract,

you had been invited on to the land so you dont have to accept the extra terms

 

. It is the same as going into a shop that has a 50% off most items sale

. the shopkeeper is not obliged to sell you everything at 50% off

and just because you walked in to enquire about sale items

you are not obliged to buy anything

and the shopkeeper certainly cant sue you because you asked about an item and didn't buy it.

 

What to do now-

Well I would get some decent pictures of the sign at the entrance

, the space you were parked in

and any other signs scattered about the place where different from the entrance/ "disabled" bay.

 

There are loads of other things that may be needed in the future but this will do for starters.

 

I am assuming that you are happy to take the long term view on this and challenge it if necessary.

 

These companies take people to court when they have no grounds to because they abuse the legal system and play a numbers game whilst doing so.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

I panicked when I received it and just replied.

 

I will go back to the carpark tomorrow and take pictures of the signs.

 

Thanks for your input.

I've been told by people 'just to pay it, it's not worth the stress'

but I can't because I feel they have no right to fine me

and they have breached the equality act 2010 by discriminating against a disabled person just because he doesn't have a blue badge, through no fault of his own ��

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you honeybee.

 

I'm determined to beat them with this and I feel that strong I want to sue them for stress haha.

 

They shouldn't be allowed to get away with this and POPLA obviously doesn't even look at the legalities ��

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as you realise that this is a long haul,

these parking co's have very little right to claim anything so rely on ignorance, bluff. threats, coercion and sometimes downright lies to earn their few hundred million.

 

The equalities angle is something that you can use but that essentially requires you to sue them rather than as an answer to their demands.

 

That is why we want to gather other information that will defeat their claim ( yes UKPC often takes people to court and are usually the losers when they do) should it get that far.

 

For the moment file away what you have received so far and dont lose it.

UKPC will be demanding more from you in the near future.

 

Can you also post up the ticket you had slapped on your car (with your car reg and their reference no redacted) so we can read the exact reason they say that you owe money?

 

There may well not be such a condition in the signage that forms the contract to actually breach.

 

POPLA dont pick up on things like that

, they are not that independent as they only consider a very limited range of things and Equalities law is one

they definitely dont touch, along with planning law issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely then if there is no such thing as the blue badge scheme on private land, they can't fine me fo not having one.

 

I'm willing to go to court with this, if they can't officially fine for using a scheme that doesn't apply

 

It is not a fine

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

more docs..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture of main car park sign.

 

The one which is showing the back of it is the first one with the terms and conditions on, that's my view as you drive in.

 

There is one across the road but you definitely can't drive in and manage to read those t & c.

 

The picture where I was parked and the sign to my right, which on the day I didn't see because of the van blocking it most likely.

 

They are my view pics.

 

My first sign I actually saw that I could actually read was the entrance one and the small one 'disabled parking ' at the bay.

 

The one to the right is in the loading bay area.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK just an observation only here.

 

The sign clearly states 'disabled persons only' now my question is two fold. Where is the photograph showing 'blue badge holders only' secondly the argument really the sign in the latest pdf.

 

It states very clearly disabled parking only! It DOES NOT STATE BLUE BADGE HOLDERS ONLY either. So if your client is in receipt of either DLA / PIP then you have abided by the t&cs of the car park. Because the sign CLEARLY states disabled people only.

 

Earlier posts are correct as the blue badge scheme doest work on private land...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 19 pix

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx DX.

 

Again the parking company are breaking the law in regards to the claim under the EA 2010. You cannot use a blue badge on private land as the RTA isn't in force.

 

Secondly a disabled person on private land has exactly the same rights as a blue badge holder. They are both disabled under the law.

 

You must not discriminate by ANY means! A blue badge is not valid on private land therefore it's discrimination under the said act.

 

As EB will agree markings on private car parks are guidance only.

 

Finally my statement stands as according to their sign disabled people may park in that bay as seen in that image. If the sign was correct it would have stated blue badge holders only.

 

In circles I'm afraid but. A picture says a thousand words. In this case disabled people. If this went to court then the DJ must agree unless it can be proven beyond all reasonable doubt that bay was for blue badge holders only!

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...