Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS/BW PCN Nov 2014 - St Andrews Retail Park -- found CCJ served to old address


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2308 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

why 4th jan? wheres that come from?

you haven't got a hearing date yet

 

get the CPR 31;14 runto the solicitors

 

[Your address]

.

 

[Their address [solicitors]

.

[Date]

.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

.

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

.

CPR 31.14 Request

.

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county court.

.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

.

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

.

1. the contract between [parking company name] and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and make claims in their own name,.

.

2.proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007

.

3.copies of the notice to driver, notice to keeper and any other correspondence from [insert Claimant Name] & [insert Solicitors Name} to the defendant that they intend to rely upon in court.

.

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are disclosed at your earliest convenience..

.

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy.

.

Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

.

If you are unable to comply with this request within 14 days and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request please confirm in your response.

.

You are reminded that as this case is yet to be allocated to a track, CPR31:14 does apply, a refusal to comply because you 'think' at this stage you dont have too will be used against you in any filed defence.

.

 

Yours faithfully

.

TYPE YOUR NAME DO NOT SIGN IT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you MUST read things carefully and properly.

 

In all of this the devil is in the detail.

 

For example, the missing address on their signs,

the lack of saying who the creditor is on their NTK.

 

These are vital points that can be easily overlooked if you arent searching for them.

Please pay attention to what is written and dont just react to what you think is there.

Take your time to understand what exactly is being said.

 

With the CPR request you give them 14 days to respond as this standard time is plenty long enough but allows someone receiving a N1 claim formlink3.gif time to fire off the request and get a response before they have to submit a defence.

 

You could say 7 days but that could be seen as unreasonable or you could say 28 days but then you dont allow yourself enugh time ti use any information gleaned in your defence.

 

Do you understand why you are asking for this?

Although the claimants dont have to comply with the request in the small claimslink3.gif procedure they sure as hell will be asked about their authority on the day as this is the basis on which they make the claim . If they dont have the permissions they lack " locus standi" which means they have no right to make a claim and it automatically fails. It is clear that an agent signed on behalf of the landowner but is there an unbroken chain of permissions from the landowner?

 

Imagine you are selling your house and you tell the estate agent you dont want people viewing it parking on your drive.

The estate agent enforces this instruction by charging those that do park there £100.

 

Now that neither satisfies your instruction regarding no parking and hasnt created an assignment of right to the estate agent to charge anyone at all despite them claiming they are managing the selling of the property.

 

They have gone beyond their powers as there is no direct chain of agreement from the viewer who parked to you.

 

This is your argument in this case regarding permissions,

they need to show the agents have full authority to make such a contract with the parking co and it is rare for a landowner to do this at that would give away other rights they hold and take all of the risk

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 4 Jan is the cut off date by which we have to contest the claim,

according to the judge at the set aside hearing

- which means we send in the CPR to BW Legal?

 

I have already completed this CPR form and filled in all her details.

I have not changed any of the wording and she has not signed it

- we have only printed her name on the CPR at the bottom,

as per your instructions dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no claim you have not had a notice of allocation of any COURT DATE!!!!

 

just send the cpr

 

you remind me of a mate of mine

 

the clocks went back an hour

he spent 45 mins winding the clock hands forward by each hour via a tiny wheel 3,4,6,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1

rather than taking 2 mins to do it backwards once

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why didn't you check that before uploading it?

pcn number on numerous pages

picture rotated anywhichway but up!!

ive sorted it for you

 

The pictures of the pcn/ntk had the address and pcn and registration numbers removed already. I canupload it again if anyone wants to check.

 

there is no claim you have not had a notice of allocation of any COURT DATE!!!!

 

just send the cpr

 

you remind me of a mate of mine

 

the clocks went back an hour

he spent 45 mins winding the clock hands forward by each hour via a tiny wheel 3,4,6,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1

rather than taking 2 mins to do it backwards once

 

I'm not your mate though.... :-)

 

@ericsbrother;5083932Thank you for your words eb.

 

I can see an address on the signs for VCS in the bottom right corner, is this the one you are talking about?

 

We will be sending the CPR off this week, probably Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not your mate though.... :-)

matters not to me

I just love to help anyone

you left the pcn no on the bottom of the red final reminder notice by the red pcn no box..

the pics were 90 right or left

probably due to the way the pdf was encoded by whatever method you are using.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

where is the address?

it says Vehicle control services and goves a phone number the a PO box number.

 

THIS IS NOT AN ADDRESS as required by both the POFA and civil procedure.

 

you must read things carefully not just take a stab at them and think that anything is true because you expect a certain answer.

 

You send the CPR as a matter of course and I dont know why you are arguing about a date.

If you have to send in an acknowledgement of service to the now set aside hearing then you do so but that has to be on the court form.

 

If you dont have that ( comes through the post) then get on to the court and get them to send it pronto.

generally though as the matter has been set aside the CLAIMANT must resubmit because there isnt a live case to consider as a result of that hearing and decision.

 

Again it appears as though you werent paying attention to the datail so now you have to spend more time asking again.

 

pay attention and if someone says something to you write it down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the court order for the set aside?

 

Perhaps it would be helpful if you could upload it (redacted of course), so that people can see exactly what it says.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they send it but it wont hurt to ask for a copy especially as you think you have to act upon it.

 

It isnt a bad move to send a skeleton defence to BWL just to indicate that you do intend to fight this and that will give them the opportunity to withdraw the claim without suffering a big costs order.

 

so use what you intend to expand on later and post something up here so we can help. basically a series of bullet points because no hearing date and no WS from VCS to consider.

 

and get your own pictures of the signage.

Never rely on theirs, they may be different to 4 years ago so their evidence would unreliable at best and perjury at worst.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE.

 

We posted the CPR form to BW Legal by recorded delivery.

 

I have started to compile our witness statement as follows:-

 

1. NTK is not POFA compliant

–There is no creditor information as required by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, paragraphs 5,6, 8 and 9.

 

They have not created a keeper liability.

That means they must identify the driver and state how they know it is the keeper.

This means they haven’t legally issued an invoice and therefore not created a keeper liability either. Excel v Mr B. C0DP33Q9 – VCS must clearly identify the driver.

 

2. Signage – too high, no valid address on the signs

- this is not an address as required by both the POFA and Civil Procedure.

Their sign with T&C's doesn’t mention who the contract is with

- they should give the full address details.

 

The part where it mentions the charge for breach of contract also includes charges that are not lawful? Which charges are not lawful?

 

We can reject the whole contract under S 62 of the Consumer Contracts Regulations. Also note that they don’t show any pictures of signage at the entrance.

 

3. Their contract with the landlord is signed by an agent

– does this agent have the authority to sign on their behalf and take people to court as well

– this is not normally what happens with an agent.

Is there an unbroken chain of permissions from the landowner?

 

NOTES -

1. If they quote Parking Eye v Beavis – Beavis admitted that he was the driver.

2. a full costs recovery order to be included in our defence submission.

 

Thanks eb.

 

We have our own pictures of the signage already.

 

I'll prepare a skeleton defence to send to BW Legal, and post it up here.

I've already put a draft on here for everyone to consider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you send the defence to COURT if it is actually asked for , copy to BWL then and only then.

 

your proposed defence needs a bit of twaeking,

for example you dont ask questions or invite them to provide evidence they have forgotten to add.

You say things like I believe they have no contract with the landowner because they have failed to produce one,

just an agreement with a third party ( dont even acknowledge the agent has any standing)

 

are your pictures differnt from theirs?

where are they?

have you done a map/plan of the site and indicated where things are and arent, for example lamp posts.

 

Beavis irrelevant unless you intend submitting the full transcript as part of your evidence as it is principally about a commercail consideration as to the amount claimed rather than just being a schedule of loss as per Dunlop v the New garage and Motor co 1915,

 

try and avoid getting into arguments about losses but do make yourself aware of the difference between a contractual sum and monies due as a result of a breach of contract and you will see why their unicorn food tax is unlawful star with reading the POFA and see what it says about billing there.

 

That is another point to challenge,

they do not stae why the money is owed ( brech or contract) in thier POC,

same as they dont say in what capacity they are suing the defendant as there is no keeper liability.

 

these are big points,

more importnat than the lack of screditor details in the scheme of things though that will halp you by adding weight to the argument about POC being rubbish and lack of cause for action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pst..no need to keep hitting reply with quote!!

we don't need to see what the last person wrote again.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 and 2 are essentially the same I would go with

1 no locus standi due to no contract with landowner that assigns any rights to enter into contracts and make civil claims in their own name ( are these words looking familiar?)

2 no cause for action against defendant as no keeper liability

3 no contract formed by signage so no breach of contract can occur.

 

You can then add meat to these bones by quoting POFA, planning regs etc in your WS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked the court about who has to submit what yet?

 

If VCS dont bother to resubmit them you wont be doing anything,

if they have to write new POC's then they will have to be served on you.

If both sides are told to say what they are going to rely on then you send the skeleton argument to court and BWL.

 

WHEN you are ordered by the court to exchange witness statements and all of the other evidence you intend to rely on you do that.

This was spelt out about 10 pages ago on this thread.

 

Currently we dont have the foggiest idea what you are required to do because you havent asked the court for clarification of what was said at the set aside and your confusion over what was going to happen at that hearing in your posts beforehand means that we cant take what you say as being accurate

hence the request that you ask them again

 

when you do ask you write it down as they tell you so there is less chance of not understanding or missing something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to get someone to answer the phone at Hull County Court after a few attempts and they told me that the computer records hadn't been updated since 17 November 2017 (before our set aside was granted on 5 December 2017).

 

Eventually they rang me back to say that our full defence needs to be sent to BW Legal and the Hull County Court by the 5 January 2018. I told her that we had sent the CPR in as well.

 

So we need the full defence sorting out next.

 

Believe it or not we are still trying to sort out the mortgage which is still taking up a lot of our time after 2 years of filling forms in, so don't be surprised if we can't get the things done that are needed here, quick enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the mortgage is another matter that can be addressed afterwards if necessary.

 

The CPR request is of no business to the court schedule so again you arent applying the advice you are given and allowing yourself to be sidetracked.

 

So, get working on your WS and list of other documents you wish to rely on You have the 3 main points to work around so you start with them and where relevat refer to things like the POFA ( make a copy of that to take with you on the day) other persuasive cases ( copies to court and BWL) etc. You rubbish their claim at each point so it is clear you dont agree with any of the bits that follow if the first argument fails.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help again EB.

 

The mortgage work has been running concurrently with the work I have had to do for the parking CCJ since January 2017. The mortgage work started in January 2016.

 

Since January 2017 , when I first asked for help here we have had 3 different brokers send mortgage applications in for us. The first did no work at all and the second sent our application to Together. Eventually, after initially being told that the application would go through without any hitches, they gave up trying after 5 months, because they had 'spent too much time on it already'. They also told us that we couldn't afford it.

 

The third broker applied to the same lender (Together) and we got a mortgage offer just in time to be able to buy the property. The offer was due to expire last Friday but our solicitor needed more time to complete so we are now hoping to complete this Friday. We have already had 2 last minute problems, one of which we have finally resolved and the other may be resolved today hopefully

 

This is not an excuse for not being able to read hundreds of threads, it is just a fact.

 

This means I don't have much time to complete the WS before Christmas as I am still trying to get everything ready for the completion. I will complete the WS though, thanks to all the help I have received here.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said, you cant change this because you have a CCJ.

That has now gone so you start again with the mortgage applications and have a go at the credit reference agencies if they havent cleared your files in a timely manner ( a month is enough) but do not tie it to you battle with VCS, it will gain you nothing by doing so.

 

Post up your WS so we can suggest edits.

 

As we weretn there and dont know everything we cant write ti for you but can correct and suggest.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

We received two forms from the Hull County Court today, a Certificate of Satisfaction or Cancellation of Judgement Debt and a Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track (Hearing).

 

The Small Claims Track notification confirms the set aside and the defendant is to file and serve defence by 5th January 2018.

 

It also states:-

 

"Unless the claimant does by 4pm on the 8 January 2018 pay to the court the trial fee of £25 or file a properly completed application (ie one which provides all the required information in the manner requested) for help with fees, then the claim will be struck out with effect from 8 January 2018 without further order and, unless the court orders otherwise, you will also be liable for the costs which the defendant has incurred."

 

The hearing of the claim will take place on the 12 February 2018.

 

Our property purchase didn't complete today (again), so I now have some time to prepare the WS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...