Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.     
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Athens security services PCN now DR+ - Main car park port Isaac PL33 9EU cornwall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2720 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 1st go on here help needed please.

 

Back in the summer we parked on a car park in Cornwall in an over flow part as the tarmac area was full. The overflow was also full so we parked on the grass edge.

We paid the appropriate fee

 

 

upon our return had a £130 parking charge notice for parking on the grass.

We caused no blockage etc.

 

 

When we returned all cars on the grass received a notice except my mothers whose car has French plates as she lives in France.

 

I immediately responded to the company and queried

1) why only British plates received the notice

2) what justification there was for this charge as I was not causing a blockage etc and

3) my vehicle had been scratched and I suspected it was their agent who had done this when affixing the sticker to my screen.

 

I also pointed out that the shale area I parked in didn't have designated parking areas and whilst there were signs saying not to park on the grass what damage was I doing.

 

I have ignored letters as I had been told to but now I'm being threatened with court action.

 

Pleeeeeeaaaasssseee help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

I have moved your post to the Private Parking forum unless you say it is an Penalty Charge.

 

Can you give the answers to this:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

and we can go from there

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not?

 

 

copy the text here and answer the questions.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For windscreen tickets (NTD) please answer the following questions.

 

1 The date of infringement? 11/08/16

2 Did you appeal to the parking company? Yes

If yes, has there been any response? No

If no, have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK)

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?

Had a number of letters don't remember seeing photographic evidence

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) not sure

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

 

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

they didn't reply

 

5 Who is the parking company? Athens security services now getting letters from debt recovery plus

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Main car park port Isaac PL33 9EU

 

For tickets received through the post (Notice to Keeper) please answer the following questions.n/a

Had a number of warning letters from debt recovery plus threatening court action but not replied to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you find out if one of the letters was a notice to keeper

and what date you got it please?

 

 

and post up your appeal you sent too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you find out if one of the letters was a notice to keeper

and what date you got it please?

 

and post up your appeal you sent too.

 

This is a car park with an issue that has not been brought out yet. It is owned by the Parish and has a Parking Places Order on it. The Parish continue to use the "we can use what we want" argument but there is significant doubt over this.

 

Suggest you appeal stating the above and see what he says. At the same time check whether the DVLA Keeper database has been accessed. Suspect not as doing so may lead to even more issues

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

I am writing with regards to the pcn received whilst on holiday in Cornwall.

 

I have a number of issues I am not happy with and would request some answers and removal of this notice.

 

The first case is that we were in an overflow car park as the main tarmac area was full. This was signposted as an overflow car park and this did not have designated parking areas and therefore it was not possible to determine "designated areas".*

 

The second point I raise is that my parents who were also with me who live in France and therefore their vehicle has a French registration plate were not issued with a ticket (picture attached). Does this mean that your "fines" are only issued to British nationals and therefore a nationalist issue?

 

The third issue is that a scratchet has appeared on our offside front wing which was not present prior to our visit and I believe your person who issued the ticket may have done this as he/she has leant over to attach the ticket.

 

I will obtain quotes for this to be repaired when I return home.

 

The final concern is that you have issued us with an excessive fee for effectively not creating any problem with others using the car park or any emergency vehicles requiring access and therefore I would like to question why you have applied this invoice to my vehicle.

 

This was the appeal I sent along with a picture of my mother's car with no ticket

Link to post
Share on other sites

By parish do you mean parish council or church and parochial church council?

 

Have you copy of the parking places order?

If not someone can be ordered to produce a copy of it so not the end of the world.

 

I would also look into the possibility that the land actually parked on in this instance isnt covered by any permission granted to the parking co to manage as a verge on the overflow is unlikely to have any consideration applied to it by the signage so just a straightfoward trespass matter rather than a parking event and that is nothing to do with Athens

 

As it is too late to appeal to them formally I would hold fire on writing anything until you have a few answers to the points raised regarding Athens' right to claim in the first place.

 

Secondly, I wouldnt use any of your suggested letter anyway as it is all irrelevant to the matter in hand which is now just a contractual matter and should be addressed as such. That can be done when you have the relevant facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already appealed it eb

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

also..

I am struggling to work out where you parked

as the main car park at the beginning of New Rd is a Cornwall county council run car park.

 

 

As emanresu says this will be covered by a traffic order and that will have nowt to do with Athens, even if they manage the place they cant create contracts and make claims in ther own name.

 

 

Same as an estate agent cant accept or reject an offer on your house they are selling for you nor can they invent their own conditions for that sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a car park with an issue that has not been brought out yet. It is owned by the Parish and has a Parking Places Order on it. The Parish continue to use the "we can use what we want" argument but there is significant doubt over this.

 

Suggest you appeal stating the above and see what he says. At the same time check whether the DVLA Keeper database has been accessed. Suspect not as doing so may lead to even more issues

My guess is that they have been to dvla to get my address as we are receiving letters.

When you say a parking place's order what is this please

 

yes, so no point writing again. They have destroyed any chance of legal action as well.

 

Is that because they haven't replied to my original email?

 

also..

I am struggling to work out where you parked

as the main car park at the beginning of New Rd is a Cornwall county council run car park.

.

 

 

As emanresu says this will be covered by a traffic order and that will have nowt to do with Athens, even if they manage the place they cant create contracts and make claims in ther own name.

 

 

Same as an estate agent cant accept or reject an offer on your house they are selling for you nor can they invent their own conditions for that sale.

 

I'm not too familiar with the area but as you come into port Isaac the car park is on the right hand side. You have to walk down a hill quite a way to get into the village

 

By parish do you mean parish council or church and parochial church council?

 

Have you copy of the parking places order?

If not someone can be ordered to produce a copy of it so not the end of the world.

 

I would also look into the possibility that the land actually parked on in this instance isnt covered by any permission granted to the parking co to manage as a verge on the overflow is unlikely to have any consideration applied to it by the signage so just a straightfoward trespass matter rather than a parking event and that is nothing to do with Athens

 

As it is too late to appeal to them formally I would hold fire on writing anything until you have a few answers to the points raised regarding Athens' right to claim in the first place.

 

Secondly, I wouldnt use any of your suggested letter anyway as it is all irrelevant to the matter in hand which is now just a contractual matter and should be addressed as such. That can be done when you have the relevant facts.

Is the parking places order the original ticket? If so yes I've got it. I didn't mention anything about parish so not too sure what you mean there?

I emailed them back in Aug. And have heard nothing but threats of court action etc. They didn't reply to my email. So do you think I should not contact them again?

 

can you find out if one of the letters was a notice to keeper

and what date you got it please?

 

 

and post up your appeal you sent too.

I'm not sure about the notice to Keeper I'm afraid. I did receive an initial letter after they had contacted dvla then it was passed onto the debt recovery lot

 

also..

I am struggling to work out where you parked

as the main car park at the beginning of New Rd is a Cornwall county council run car park.

 

 

As emanresu says this will be covered by a traffic order and that will have nowt to do with Athens, even if they manage the place they cant create contracts and make claims in ther own name.

 

 

Same as an estate agent cant accept or reject an offer on your house they are selling for you nor can they invent their own conditions for that sale.

It's on the right as you come into port Isaac. You have to park there and walk down a hill into the village if that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an email to the Parish ([email protected]) and let them know you have a ticket

 

Ask them

 

1. Is there a Parking Places Order on this car park or has it been lawfully withdrawn

 

2. If there is and it has not been lawfully withdrawn, why is AS Parking issuing tickets on site

 

Come back when they have replied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we are talking about the same car park then,

the PO's description is not helpful to those who have never been there and rely on looking at a map.

 

 

Emanescu,s point is a very pertinent one for several reasons

so do send that email and dont add any waffle to the 2 points raised.

 

The POFA makes reference to "private land" and"relevant land" and spell out what isnt relevant land for the purpose of the Act Land covered by a Parking Places Order is not relevant land

 

 

so AS cannot apply to the DVLA for your keeper details and keep within the law and that is ne of the reasons you should never contact a parking co about a ticket slapped on your car and make them do the running.

 

 

Their claim is a nonsense as they werent offering you anything at the time and they have no authority to do so but it would have been another fatal blow to their claim if you forced them to go along with the protocols of the POFA and then got them for not having the right to dos o.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use a search engine to look for Cornwall County Council (Off-street Parking Places) Order, you'll be able to download a copy. It assumes that the driver is the owner (which is defined in the Traffic Management Act 2004 as the registered keeper) unless demonstrated to the contrary.

Interestingly, while the Order allows the Council to issue a Penalty Charge Notice to the person in charge of the vehicle, or the person "who appears to the Council to be the Owner", it doesn't make provision for how they acquire this information. As EB has said, they are not allowed to use any powers under POFA as it is not relevant land. I don't know if any other legislation covers this point, or gives you a loophole to exploit; the experts will be able to advise.

 

 

Another couple of restrictions imposed by the Order are that you are not allowed to use any part of the vehicle for sleeping or eating. If they were to enforce that, I can see the tourist trade in Port Isaac going down the toilet! Oh, and no ball games in the car park. Is there anything in law to say that if a clause within an Act, Regulation or Order is not enforced, it lapses??? Wonder how many parents have had PCNs for their kiddies having a kick-about?!

 

 

HTH

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use a search engine to look for Cornwall County Council (Off-street Parking Places) Order, you'll be able to download a copy. It assumes that the driver is the owner (which is defined in the Traffic Management Act 2004 as the registered keeper) unless demonstrated to the contrary.

Interestingly, while the Order allows the Council to issue a Penalty Charge Notice to the person in charge of the vehicle, or the person "who appears to the Council to be the Owner", it doesn't make provision for how they acquire this information. As EB has said, they are not allowed to use any powers under POFA as it is not relevant land. I don't know if any other legislation covers this point, or gives you a loophole to exploit; the experts will be able to advise.

 

 

Another couple of restrictions imposed by the Order are that you are not allowed to use any part of the vehicle for sleeping or eating. If they were to enforce that, I can see the tourist trade in Port Isaac going down the toilet! Oh, and no ball games in the car park. Is there anything in law to say that if a clause within an Act, Regulation or Order is not enforced, it lapses??? Wonder how many parents have had PCNs for their kiddies having a kick-about?!

 

 

HTH

 

Am I missing something as the OP was issued with a Parking Chareg Notice and not a Penalty Charge Notice so the above Order probably would not apply anyway. This seems to indicate that the land was private and not council land. I wonder who is the owner of the land?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...