Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The "grief tech" firms helping users create talking avatars of their dead relatives.View the full article
    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DEL backdoor CCJ for Surrey County Council car park??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Right at the beginning of this case when I received the debt recovery letter and letter from Gladys,

I panicked and paid GBP70 to DEL straight away.

 

After weeks of trying,

DEL will not return the money.

 

They are saying that this money is lieu of the CCJ.

 

The case is still pending and have filed set-aside.

 

Is small claims court the easiest and fastest way to get money returned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you paid by debit card

go do a chargeback

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh dear...

what made you do it that way?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

take two.

how did you findout their details?

was it on a letter?

 

 

just never confuse fines with speculative invoices mind...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was on their website.

 

I have learnt a lot since I posted my question on this excellent website.

 

When I received the letters from Gladys and debt collector without ever receiving any letters from DEL,

I tried to resolve this directly with them.

That's when I decided to investigate further why they were not willing to close case since I was willing to and paid them the full amount (excluding solicitors etc charges)

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are no fines it is just a demand for money without proof you owe anything.

Get your head around this fact and proceed from there.

 

As for the money,

tell your bank that you want to do a recharge as the maony paid was as a result of misrepresentation of their position.

 

They are correct in why they say they arent going to return it,

you have to go back to court with your set aside

and if you then get that they will have to refund anyway

unless you somehow lose the rematch.

In the meanwhile start gathering your evidence for that hearing.

 

 

Panic and fear since I have never picked any fines or PCN ever and thought if I paid the amount straight away, they might close case.
Link to post
Share on other sites

planning permission for the signage but importantly we need to see what the signs actually say.

The fact you were out of the country is irrelevant, it is not an argument to use.

 

also,

are the signs visible as you eneter the car park from the public highway?

 

If the only signs are on a back wall somewhere then they will fail the visibility test.

 

Look out for signs that contain differetn wordings as well,

photograph every differetn sign and say where they are in relation to the entrance and where your vehicle was parked.

 

You are going to provide a plan of this to the court,

 

CEL will send in computer generated signage that oftem bears no relationship tot the real signs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

Will I have to provide all the evidence during the set aside hearing?

 

I have been communicating with court where the set aside is scheduled for by email and on the phone.

 

I have spoken to them twice and sent 2 emails confirming the phone discussion to move the case to my local court.

 

During the first call, court clerk agreed to discuss case with judge but he didn't come with an answer.

 

I rang again and spoke to the same person and recalled our conversation and promised to speak to judge (he hadn't until the 2nd call). The date is less than 2 weeks away.

 

Please does anybody know what I need to do without having to rely on person at the court, to have this case moved to my local court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you got access to a fax machine?

 

When the set aside is granted the matter will have to be reconsidered unless the parking co decide to drop the matter

( they might do if they think you have enough to beat them)

 

 

at another hearing, which will be at your local court.

 

 

The actual set aside isnt that important to attend as long as your reasons for it are accepted.

 

 

I can see CEL objecting all the way though as they have had cash from you so they think you are going to pay them some more if things get tough

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, of course not, that is the point of a set aside hearing, to decide if there is grounds for rehearing the case.

 

 

You then get to have it all discussed at you local court.

 

 

The set-aside may get transferred if the courts service thinks there is a good reason for doing so..

 

Have you read properly what paperwork you have received as it will all be in there.

 

 

If they say telephone conference then that is what it will be,

you sit next to your phone at the required time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, the only paper I have received is the from CCBC. One telling me the case transferred to claimants local court, with date and time and the other is my N244 with court stamp.

I have gathered the evidence today. Took photos. No barrier or any notices at the entrance and then 2 small size A4 notices stuck on wall which I couldn't have seen at night (there is no lighting in the car park) stating the parking charge if no valid permit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should try speaking to the courts service to have the matter decided on the papers or transferred to your court. This is why I asked about access to a fax machine, you could then get this done immediately but you wont get a response over a weekend. Send it anyway thiough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you fax the baulk centre that issued the claim and the court that has been allocated as the court to hear the set-aside and simply tell them that you either want the matter transferred to (name of court) or that the set-aside be decided on the papers and the reharing be at (local court). You will have made some representsation on the set-aside form and that should be enough but you can add more but it will not be necessary to go into the rights and wrongs of the claim, it is about WHY you couldnt respond to the original claim. You are resetting the clock so dont distract focus from that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, emails dont get read for about a fortnight wheras faxes are seen as urgent. If you would rather spend time arguing rather than doing then you cant expect to get the result you want and have to put up with what is doled out to you. So, off the Manchester for you it is then..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will not believe how much I have spent on the phone and emails with Northampton on this. They are saying they have followed all processes correctly. Their reason is that the correspondence address on the n244 is out of UK and therefore by default, all cases are sent to claimant's local court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...