Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

False Information given to Rent Officer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Landlords gave false information to the Rent Officer in support of an application to register a new rent. This was in respect to a fellow tenant who is vulnerable. I informed the landlords of their inaccuracies several times and they took no action to correct them.

 

The Rent Officer made an inspection and heard evidence. The landlords sent a representative who did not give evidence. The Rent Officer accepted all of the tenant's evidence and fixed a fair rent. Is there any action that can be taken against the landlords who were either attempting fraud or at the very least being grossely negligent?

 

The tenant has suffered no financial loss but several months of worry. The landlords is a Housing Association and has refused to deal with the matter under their complaints procedure so it is now being referred to the Housing Ombudsman's Service.

 

I am wondering if anything else might be done to stop this abuse of a vulnerable person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as it has gone to the HO then you are better letting things run their course. The only other people worth contacting would be the trustees of the HA as they are legally laible for all that their staff get up to. You may well get some sort of apology for your neighbour this way as well as a formal investigation about the refusal to follow procedure. Make sure you have an alternative address to post your letter to though or they will disappear in the internal mail system of the HA. Most HA trustees are fairly public figures so sending the letter to another business address will be sufficient if you cant find their home address

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. In the past I was not sure that letters sent to the HA for the Trustees were actually received by them. At that time the trustees were not public figures but they now are so I am following your advice and seeking to contact them direct. I am taking care to ensure that my allegations are kept as private and confidential as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience is that a letter sent via the HA doesnt get there. HA's hate having to publish bad news about themselves in their annual reports so the upper echelons of the staff will do almost anything to stop this happening. Same goes for most Quangos like these training agencies paid to look after the long term unemployed and the companies paid to evaluate the long term sick and disabled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ericsbrother and a quote for the email I received from them earlier today with indentifying stuff removed.

 

"If you have any information which you wish to be passed on to Board members in the future, I think it may be more appropriate for you to send it to me and I assure you I will forward it to them on your behalf. As you may be aware our Board members work with XXHA on a voluntary basis and many have paid employment in other organisations, and I’m sure you will respect their desire to keep their involvement with XXHA separate from their other professional activities."

 

Oddly enough I do know having been a board member of several organisations over the years. My experience now over thirty years ago of our director being arrested by the Police for extortion was something which did surprise us. After that when I have been a board member I have always given contact details so that employees or people using the service could get in contact with me direct.

 

The rest of the email pretended that they knew nothing about it which is strange lookiing at the heap of emails which I am currently organising.

 

They are worried and they have much to worry about. I am not seeking revenge but I am fed up with the hypocracy of the organisation. Will let you know what happens next.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Landlords gave false information to the Rent Officer in support of an application to register a new rent. This was in respect to a fellow tenant who is vulnerable. I informed the landlords of their inaccuracies several times and they took no action to correct them.

 

The Rent Officer made an inspection and heard evidence. The landlords sent a representative who did not give evidence. The Rent Officer accepted all of the tenant's evidence and fixed a fair rent. Is there any action that can be taken against the landlords who were either attempting fraud or at the very least being grossely negligent?

 

The tenant has suffered no financial loss but several months of worry. The landlords is a Housing Association and has refused to deal with the matter under their complaints procedure so it is now being referred to the Housing Ombudsman's Service.

 

I am wondering if anything else might be done to stop this abuse of a vulnerable person.

 

Thank you. In the past I was not sure that letters sent to the HA for the Trustees were actually received by them. At that time the trustees were not public figures but they now are so I am following your advice and seeking to contact them direct. I am taking care to ensure that my allegations are kept as private and confidential as possible.

Thank you ericsbrother and a quote for the email I received from them earlier today with indentifying stuff removed.

 

"If you have any information which you wish to be passed on to Board members in the future, I think it may be more appropriate for you to send it to me and I assure you I will forward it to them on your behalf. As you may be aware our Board members work with XXHA on a voluntary basis and many have paid employment in other organisations, and I’m sure you will respect their desire to keep their involvement with XXHA separate from their other professional activities."

 

Oddly enough I do know having been a board member of several organisations over the years. My experience now over thirty years ago of our director being arrested by the Police for extortion was something which did surprise us. After that when I have been a board member I have always given contact details so that employees or people using the service could get in contact with me direct.

 

The rest of the email pretended that they knew nothing about it which is strange lookiing at the heap of emails which I am currently organising.

 

They are worried and they have much to worry about. I am not seeking revenge but I am fed up with the hypocracy of the organisation. Will let you know what happens next.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

What exactly was the false information the LLs gave the Rent officer.

 

It can be a complex matter applying for a fair rent to be registered under 1977 Rent act, LLs could have made a genuine mistake !

 

Who applied for a fair rent, was it the LL, Tenant or joint application by LL and T...

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed it might have been originally and so I did what any resonable person would which was to contact them pointing this out. But they persisted over a period of some months before the hearing despite many requests to correct the information. The false information roughly, not precisely which would coved several pages, was that furniture was supplied, that the tenant was responsible for damaging furniture, that cleaning services were provided, and so on and on. Accounts were included which referred to an aggregate of other properties. The person supplying the information was an accountant who had once been empoyed as an auditor. I am not claiming that s/he was guilty of fraud which requires dishonesty. I suspect that the person was so arrogant that they could not believe anyone else might be correct. Their failure to check information after, I think, at least six warnings is remarkable. Their contemptuous behaviour in sending a housing officer who had no knowledge of the issues to the hearing is disgraceful and shameful. No wonder they don't want the Board members to know what went on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed it might have been originally and so I did what any resonable person would which was to contact them pointing this out. But they persisted over a period of some months before the hearing despite many requests to correct the information. The false information roughly, not precisely which would coved several pages, was that furniture was supplied, that the tenant was responsible for damaging furniture, that cleaning services were provided, and so on and on. Accounts were included which referred to an aggregate of other properties. The person supplying the information was an accountant who had once been empoyed as an auditor. I am not claiming that s/he was guilty of fraud which requires dishonesty. I suspect that the person was so arrogant that they could not believe anyone else might be correct. Their failure to check information after, I think, at least six warnings is remarkable. Their contemptuous behaviour in sending a housing officer who had no knowledge of the issues to the hearing is disgraceful and shameful. No wonder they don't want the Board members to know what went on.

 

 

If there was any previous Fair rent registered, it should say here https://www.tax.service.gov.uk/check-register-fair-rents/search if there was "furniture was supplied" cleaning services were provided, any service charges and so on and on.

 

The main point is a fair rent has been registered, which is going to protect your fellow tenant.

 

From reading your previous posts on this HA and if your fellow tenant wants to continue with compliant to Housing Ombudsman.

 

Your fellow tenant should ask for help from CAB or Shelter and leave it at that....

 

 

 

..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application to increase Fair Rent is a simple 2 sided A4 form. Any new Services provided/sig improvements since last Registration and new rent requested is all that is required, from memory. Other info reqd is a matter of record. Ts vulnerability status is not considered. RO attended Property and talked to T before making a decision. T/LL had 30 days from Adj Notice receipt to challenge RO decision, then Fair Rent is fixed for 2 years. Increases tend to follow pre-ordained calculation.

How come T qualifies for a Fair Rent from HA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application to increase Fair Rent is a simple 2 sided A4 form. Any new Services provided/sig improvements since last Registration and new rent requested is all that is required, from memory. Other info reqd is a matter of record. Ts vulnerability status is not considered. RO attended Property and talked to T before making a decision. T/LL had 30 days from Adj Notice receipt to challenge RO decision, then Fair Rent is fixed for 2 years. Increases tend to follow pre-ordained calculation.

How come T qualifies for a Fair Rent from HA?

 

Form RR1 is indeed just 2 pages https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/438033/RR1-applicationforregistrationoffairrent.pdf

 

However addition information like tenancy agreements, service charges, any relevant information, so on can held at Rent office in paper form attached to a application.

 

Question 3 on the form asks

 

3

Name and Address of Landlord

If a registered housing association or

housing trust, or the Housing Corporation, tick here

A housing association tenant can have a fair rent set as long as they moved in before 15/01/1989, however its not called a regulated tenancy like with private LLs, 1977 rent act/42/section/15 and 16, as amend.

 

So housing association tenants can have a fair rent registered.

 

If there have been any significant improvements in the property since last registration, this is covered by "Rent act" 1999 Capping order which limit any rent increase to 15% on top of the existing fair rent.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

The form is indeed two pages long and had several other pages attached to it.

 

The tenant moved in over thirty years ago.

 

There have been no improvements to the property.

 

And some other points - the fellow tenant is unable because of disablity to seek help from the CAB or Shelter. In my experience each of these would say that as a Fair Rent has been registered the problem is solved. I have the Housing Ombudsman forms and have reported the matter to the Local Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Update on 4 December I became ill which has turned out to be cancer and the doctors are not sure that the treatment will work. I've had an operation and start chemo later this week. The tenant is content with the new rent. I am inclined to leave matters.

 

Thank you for your advice and guidance for which I am very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...