Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MMF claimform - lending stream PDL - missed payment now have CCJ?


Myfamily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2371 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Find the DN, and 'Notice of default sums'.

 

Have you copies of the correspondence you sent to LS regarding financial difficulty and their refusal to help you?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all,

 

I'm sorry I never got back to this one, after very careful searching I found in my inbox an old email that I never saw before which was from LS agreeing my payment plan, I didn't see it before.

 

I wrote back to moriarty law, and said I just wanted the debt gone,

they said as a claim had been issue they could only accept a payment plan over 6 months.

I agreed, made the first payment in august

 

I thought i had set up a standing order too but I hadn't.

 

I got a letter now saying I broke the agreement and donuts in default, and i now have a ccj :-(

 

It says that if I pay the full amount within 1 mmonth, that the ccj gets removed.

 

I can do this tomorrow.

But is that true??

And do I have to let the ICO know myself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry you seem to have got missed about the court claim

why didn't you defend it

100's of MMF claim threads here already with the details of how.

 

can you scan this CCJ letter up please to pdf read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a terrible year really :-( and I just wanted them to go away, I thought I could just get rid of them in 6 months and that would be that, then stupidly somehow didn't manage to set up a standing order properly and here I am!

 

attached is the letter from Moriarty law and the court, I have read that to have it set aside will cost £255, which I don't have, I can pay the ccj in full tomorrow but I want to make sure it never reaches my credit file!

ccj letters.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it paid it wont show

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ensure moriarty inform the court

get a receipt too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the judgement entered?

 

the claim form was raised on 18/7/17 so default could have been entered "About" the 20th of September

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to ask Moriarty to email you a receipt - you then ring the court and ask where to send a copy of the receipt so they don't register the judgement.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is the e-mail I sent to moriarty law.

 

"I am very disappointed to receive your letter saying that you have applied from judgement in default. I had thought that I had set up a standing order but apparently I hadn't completed it properly, which led to the payment being missed.

 

It was a genuine error and I feel that it was un-necessary for you apply for judgement in default. A simple e-mail to me would have been all that was needed I could have checked and made payment straight away.

 

I am going to make full payment today, so can you please send me a receipt for that and ensure that the court is advised not to proceed with the judgement.

 

I do not want to see this appear on my credit file."

 

 

and this is their response

 

 

"Thank you for your email.

 

We are sorry to receive your complaint, the contents of which have been duly noted and as such we wish to confirm that late payment letter was issued on 27th September 2017 confirming that the payment as due 22nd September had not been received and requesting that further contact/payment be made. Unfortunately as no response was received, Judgment was entered on 10th October 2017.

 

Please be assured however that as payment of the full outstanding balance has been received within one month of Judgment being entered, the Courts shall duly remove the CCJ from your credit file. Whilst we are unable to confirm precisely how long this process shall take, we are aware that the Courts are operating under a backlog and as such the process may take as many as 4 weeks to complete. Further information regarding this may be obtained by contacting the County Court Business Centre directly on 0300 123 1056.

 

Please be assured that your case has now been closed on our system as Paid in Full and a notification has been issued to the Court to confirm as such. In the event that our Client has registered a default in respect of this debt, we further wish to confirm that said default shall, within the course of 30 days from receiving payment, be updated to show that the debt has been settled by way of payment in full.

 

Thank you.

 

Yours sincerely, "

 

 

I am not very happy with their reply to be honest, I did not receive a letter, and I'm not sure I believe that they sent one - as I received other letters from them - so why not this one - they also had my e-mail address so why didn't they e-mail me, as we had conversed before in that manner?

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO let it lie, they got their grubby money, your file is clean, they're off your case.

 

They're less likely to look at a complaint otherwise you wouldn't have paid it, unfortunately as they see it, the time to have lodged a formal complaint will have been before you paid them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...