Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • Owners of older vehicles tell the BBC of their anger that their cars' apps will stop working.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old stayed claim from council for 'services' - now Notice of hearing of application


jandl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received the above from the local county court,

it relates to a county court judgement that was made to an address I have never lived at or used as an address, my son and his partner live there, 

I moved from my home in June 2020,

the company I owe the money too were notified of my change of address and the debt relates to services in the first 6 months of 2021.

The ccj was issued in May 2022.

They stated on the ccj that they had made contact with me, which they obviously haven't as my son's partner gave them my address and phone number and they rang me at the end of May 22.

I remember vaguely them giving me a web address and asking me to fill in a form, and when I asked them to provide a breakdown of the debt they texted me some figures, I remember filling in a form though cannot remember what it was about and asking for a proper letter not a vague txt message.

The notice of hearing is asking for the automatic stay be lifted and permission be granted to the claimant to amend the statement of case pursuant to CPR 17.1 (2) (b).

And that the defendant to file a response within 21 days of service, also that the life of the claim be extended for a period of 4 months

Help what does it all mean and what should I do

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont have a ccj,?

you mean you got a claimform, but you filed a defence and the claim got stayed as they did not moved it forward i expect?

did you file a defence back then? what was it please?

have you still got the claimform we the particulars of claim and can you still access the mcol website if thats what was used?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to old stayed claim from council for 'services' - now Notice of hearing of application

A ccj was issued in my name but at the wrong address,

according to their evidence it was a response to the claim,

but apparently it was incomplete or wrong as Northampton said they had not received a response from me.

I have no info as I wrote the details on a scrap of paper as they were given to me over the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have/had a judgement ccj against you, then it will show on your credit file, as long as that address is one you had lived at in the past or is showing as a link address on your credit file. check your credit file for both please

your story or my understanding of what has happened to you vs what should happen legally  - do not match.

if you know the CCJ number (alpha numeric) then give northants bulk a ring quoting that and the address it was served to and get them to check

if they find it get them to send you a copy of the judgement and at the very least the particulars of claim by email pdf

im still confused if you did or did not defend that claim.

and i cnt see why the claim needs to be extended by 4mts as the ccj(or Claim) will still be live , which is why they've requested to lift the stay and resume the claim.

is this latest letter from northampton bulk or another court?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A court local to where I live now, I have already got a copy of the ccj sent to me.

The name is mine but the address is not mine nor has it ever been, I have NEVER used that address, the only link I have is that my son lives there.

I guess they just guessed same surname and local to where I lived.

I don't understand what they are trying to do and for what reason.

I will pay the debt happily, but reluctant to pay the extra charges they have added without ever properly contacting me

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type no need to hit quote.

you say you have a copy of the ccj? -  the default judgement for claimant?

if so scan that up and this notice of allocation then please to PDF read upload.

if they already have default judgement i wonder what it is they are trying to vary by the NOA?

there are no extra charges to you (other than the court fees for the original CCJ) 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they dont need to do that

they have their judgement

the address being wrong and you admitting you owe and will pay negates any reason to amend the claim.

you would still have had to have paid the court fees regardless to it being a backdoor CCJ.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not admitted that to any one.

The company I owed the money too had my change of address, they sent me paperwork and ID Card etc to my new address. 

Unfortunately their billing department never got the change of address, and I never got my final bills from them.

The ccj is not a ccj, now that I can see it on my laptop and not little phone screen, it is the claim form.

They state upon it "full particulars have been sent to the defendant" In fact they had not as I had no contact from anyone.

I am sorry I thought it was the CCJ itself. 

What if I ring the solicitors tomorrow and offer to pay,

will they accept,

can they accept and what happens to the process they are trying to go through.

What are they trying to achieve and what if I do not turn up and do not send in a defence.

I am not happy to pay the court fee and legal representative fee as I would have paid if I had known beforehand, but as I was unaware I could not.

Thankyou for your help so far it is very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

thought it must only be a claimform.

please complete this then we will have the right information to  PROPERLY advise you...:whistle:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at work at the mo, so do not have all the info available, but just wondered if I ring the solicitors and pay will they be able to stop the judgement going ahead and the will not need to go ahead with the hearing to get the stay lifted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant get a default judgement if you defend etc . it will cost you no more nor hurt you to PLEASE.......

please .....get that Q&A link done 

then we can help PROPERLY!!

you might not even owe anything

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us]

 

 

Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Northampton

 

MCOL Northampton N1 ?

Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ?

New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?

 

If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)

 

 

Name of the Claimant ? Canal and River Trust

 

How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 16 May 2022 but has been stayed

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

The claim is for £880 in respect for outstanding invoices dated between 1st April 2021 and 30th September 2021. Full particulars which have been delivered to the defendent. The claimant claims interest on the amount pursuant with the county court act 1984  and fees etc

 

What is the total value of the claim? £1079
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  NO
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? I changed my address 11 months before in June 2020

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Yes but the invoicing department were not notified

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? N/A No agreement though it was well after 2007 when I started working with them
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? N/A
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? not sure
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Claimants solicitors DCA
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No, I was not aware of the debt at all
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No I was not aware of the debt
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? Was not aware never received invoices as had moved address
 

What was the date of your last payment? N/A
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...