Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA Claimform - Halifax credit card debt ***Claim Dismissed***


amerillo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1753 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you never respond to a failed CCA

 

simply invite letter tennis

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello all.....Merry Christmas!

 

And a Merry Christmas from PRA too! As a present from them I have just this morning received a County Court Claim Form giving me 14 days to respond!

Not sure what to do now!

 

Also, in the response section about residence, the form asks whether I live in my own house, a jointly owned property, rented accommodation, lodgings or council accommodation. As the house is in my wife's sole name, should I put "lodgings" as my status?

 

This letter doesn't really worry me as I have no interest in credit since all this happened so I'm not worried about the credit rating.

I don't own the house so not worried about a charging order.

I am currently unemployed, although will be going self-employed in the new year so not worried about an attachment of earnings order. I

am also aware that I cannot be imprisoned for having a CCJ.

 

However, I am a little worried about bailiffs turning up to try a take goods from the house, or them applying to make me bankrupt, at which point I believe they may take my "beneficial interest" in the house and other things into account.

 

I may be jumping the gun a bit (as is normal for me), but should I be pre-empting all of these outcomes by transferring beneficial interest in the house and any other valuable goods to the wife??

 

Thanks again!

AM

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legals and retitled

 

you'd have to lose the case and not pay in 28 days to ever get bailiffs involved

and even then it would be court bailiffs

as its a consumer debt - theres no right of forced entry anyway ...so forget about that silly stuff.

 

please complete this

so we have all the correct info to properly advise tou

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do-**UPDATED-2018**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks.

 

I have filled out the questions. CCA has already been done as per previous posts.

 

Should I do the CPR 31.14 and CPR part 18 now, or should I hold fire for the moment?

 

However, before I post the answers to the questions, I just wanted to run something past you. Whilst writing out the Particulars of Claim, I noticed what seems to be a mistake......they have said that I entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc......actually it is Halifax, as you know. Do I need to correct this?

 

Thanks so much

AM

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you don't

quite typical of them to get OC's incorrect

lots of Halifax card claims here already about that.

 

just do as advised in the link

and no to cpr 18...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow this

bar sending a newCCA request

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

 

 

,...…………..

 

did you ever get that sar to HBOS done?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, will get that done.

 

I'm a little confused by the difference between acknowledgement and defence. Going by the steps outlined in the above post, is that my acknowledgement? Do I then need to file the defence separately afterwards?

 

Regarding the paperwork, the claim form does not clearly state the solicitors firm acting on behalf of PRA, just the name of the person. In this case, who should I address the CPR 31.14 to?

 

Haven't yet done the HBOS SAR.......I'm guessing this may be something worth doing now?

 

Finally, I'm guessing I will need to provide a reason why I am defending, but I'm not sure what exactly my angle of defence is! Am I contesting due to incomplete paperwork?

 

Thanks

AM

Link to post
Share on other sites

read post 58 CAREFULLY...

 

cpr goes to PRA then.

 

your def in not due till DAY 33

 

seems like you've been guessing about the sar for +2yrs numerous times now you were told to do it

it could well be the key to winning here.

esp if it blows those PRA statements out the water as faked or cut n paste

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, a bit of an oversight on my part regarding the SAR. I'll follow the new SAR guidelines and get this off to Halifax.

 

One thing that did occur to me yesterday is that the account statements that PRA have sent me do not show the £1 token payments that I made from 2010 after the account defaulted. So, according to that, nothing to show any payments or admission of the debt for nearly 9 years now.

 

I hope the SAR documents arrive in time for my defence deadline!!!

 

Thanks

AM

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't need to.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, MCOl AOS complete and just putting together the CPR and SAR. I just have a few questions regarding the two documents:

 

1. As per the Particulars of Claim in my answers in post 57, the only documents explicitly referred to are the agreement and the notice of assignment. However, they do mention that I defaulted. So, am I correct in thinking that, in the CPR 31:14, I should be asking for the agreement, the notice of assignment AND the default notice?

 

2. Should the case number on the CPR 31:14 letter be the claim number written on the claim form?

 

3. Regarding the SAR to Halifax, the advice is to send a current council tax bill in order to verify my identity. However, as I have been under student status, I am not currently named on the current bill. Is there anything else I should provide?

 

Thanks

AM

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

yes

utils bill?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a utility bill will suffice then I can use one of those. However, it just occurred to me that Halifax only sold this on to PRA a few months ago, before which they were writing to me at my current address (I had given my current address in my CCA requests). So, they should actually already have me down as living here. In this case, would I still need to send them proof of address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

knowing haliprats do it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I am aware that the defense deadline for this is approaching (next Sunday)

I have been thinking a lot about my defense,

going through some of the threads on here etc.

 

However, I am still a quite lost about how to go about defending effectively.

From what I gather, there is a standard defense, but I am not entirely sure (???).

 

I have yet to receive a response to my CPR letter to PRA,

and have not had a response to the SAR from Halifax either

(although I am keeping my eye on the clock for that and will raise an ICO complaint if it gets to 1 month and I still haven't received the documents from Halifax).

 

Further, as well as a potential standard defense,

I have also been giving serious thought to also including a line about it being statute barred,

as per post #61;

I know it isn't,

but if the statements they sent me as part of my PAP request don't show the £1 token payments then perhaps this could work too??

 

Any help with this much appreciated

Thanks

AM

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

your defence [not defense] is not due till 4pm Monday 21st.

 

use the std no paperwork/holding defence

 

the fact that even under the PAP reply they have produced no proof of payment within 6yrs can be introduced at the disclosure stage if things get that far.

 

have a go at your defence

post it up here in good time for a looksee by those in the know.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, apologies for the American-English! I thought that it looked incorrect, but my computer was insistent!! Must have it set to the wrong language setting!

 

One question about the no paperwork/holding defence: it is based on PRA not sending the documents I have asked for in the CPR, i.e. the notice of assignment, default notice and CCA. However, they have already provided me with the notice of assignment and CCA as part of the PAP. Does that mean that I should amend the defence so that it only reflect the fact that I haven't received the default notice?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just send the standard defence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

not fully complied.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up here 1st mind for checking

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I have managed to put together so-far.

Points that I am unsure about are in bold (actually, I'm unsure about it all, but you know what I mean!!):

 

Particulars of Claim:

 

1.The Claimant claims the sum of £3395.00 for an outstanding debt owed.

 

2. On XX/XX/2008 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a Credit Card under reference XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

 

3. On XX/XX/2010 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £3463.

 

4. On XX/XX/2018 the debt of £3395 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Ltd.

Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925.

 

5.AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1.The sum of £3395.

 

Defence:

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 - ???

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I do not recall ever having any financial dealings with Lloyds Bank Plc. I have sought verification from the claimant regarding this matter and they have failed to comply.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied, given that I do not recall ever having entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. I have sought verification from the claimant regarding this matter and they have failed to comply.

 

5. Paragraph 4 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served last year from either the Claimant or Lloyds Bank Plc.

6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant,

 

the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14,and remains in default of my section 77 request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

7. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 77/78 request, copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date the Claimant has failed to comply to my section 77/78 request.

 

8. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

So, I don't really know how to respond to Paragraph 1 in the POC other than to just say that I deny owing that money!

 

My response to Paragraph 2 in the POCs was based on the fact that this was supposed to be a Halifax card but for some reason the Claim Form says Lloyds Bank Plc.

i'm aware of some connection between the two, but surely it should say Halifax?

 

I'm unsure about my response to Paragraph 4 of the POC because I did actually receive the Notice of Assignment, both before the PAP, and as part of the PAP response from PRA.

 

Any advice much appreciated!

Thanks

AM

Edited by dx100uk
poc/spacing/merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...