Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas Standing Charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2831 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Problem with British gas. Thinking of sending this letter to BG any thoughts / advice appreciated

 

I have owned this property for approximately 12 years and it has never been habitable for this time.

I received bills from Npower for £0 for electric and British Gas for £0 for gas. Because these bills were for £0 I used to simply throw them away. The bills were always addressed to 'The Occupier'

 

My problem is with British Gas.

The meter is situated in an outside cabinet, I have no gas appliances and no gas piping, the gas pipes terminate in the meter cabinet.

 

I received a bill from BG on the 31st August 2013 which showed that the actual meter reading was 1412 (same as 10 years ago) and that no gas was used and the bill came to zero (no standing charges ).

 

The next bill I got was dated the 5th August 2015 Which was an estimated reading of 1413 with a total to pay of £176.63.

 

I immediately phoned BG and explained the situation and was clearly told that I should change my supplier to one that didn't have a standing charge and that this bill would be cancelled as I had never had a contract with BG.

 

I did this immediately but then got a letter from BG to say that they had blocked the transfer as I owed them the £176.63.

 

I again phoned BG and spoke with a lady who was extremely rude and told me in no uncertain terms that I was responsible for the bill and should honor my commitments, not being happy with this I asked to be transferred to a supervisor, no supervisor was available but I was assured that a supervisor would ring me back. (I am still awaiting that phone call).

 

Since that time I have

 

Had standing charges added to my account

Had extra charges added to my account for a debt visit (£36.00) and an administration charge (£13.00)

Been notified that a legal warrant of entry had been obtained and a visit was to be made on the 25th April 2016 to fit a prepayment meter. - No visit was made

Been notified that a legal warrant of entry had been obtained and a visit was to be made on the 30th June 2016 to fit a prepayment meter. - No visit was made

Threatened again that a legal warrant of entry will be obtained to fit a prepayment meter

 

Questions that I have of BG

 

From the last 10 years bills (2004 to 2013) you should have known that no gas was ever used why didn't you inform 'The Occupier' that you were going to introduce a standing charge.

Why do you persist in wanting to fit a prepayment meter when no gas is consumed.

Why haven't you looked at my notes and made that phone call that you promised.

Why have you blocked my transfer (you could still have pursued me for the debt) instead heaping as much pressure as possible.

Why have you escalated the debt from £176.63 (4th August 2015) to £304.25 (8th June 2016)

Edited by stuntman2
Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means send the letter – although it probably won't do any good, but you may as well lay down a paper trail.

 

Have you checked your credit file? I think the you should do the straightaway.

 

Send British Gas an SAR – in particular you badly need to see whether there are warrants in place or whether they are telling porkies.

 

I suggest also that you read our customer services guide and implement the advice there and record some telephone calls with their customer service department to get evidence of their stupidity and of their unpleasant attitude. This will help you.

 

There are two routes that you can take. You could complain to the ombudsman – which will be free and may take a long time or you could begin a small claim in the County Court.

 

You may as well start to complain to the ombudsman and I would suggest that the letter you send makes it clear that you are making a formal complaint and you want the matter move to the ombudsman. This will start the process although you will have to wait eight weeks. During that time you should receive the results of the SAR and you can start to understand how serious this all is. You will also have been able to check your credit file and see whether they have blighted it for you. I should check your credit file regularly every couple of weeks for the moment.

 

After you have begun the ombudsman process, if it starts to get out of hand then you could abandon that complaint and simply go to court. We will be able to help you and we will be pleased to do so

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand having just helped someone on a similar problem... (no gas used) the only way to get rid of a standing charge form BG is to close the account tell them to shift the meter..or as you state switch to a supplier that has no standing charge.

 

Under new rules from the regulator Ofgem, energy suppliers have to offer energy tariffs that show: a standing charge which is the fixed part of your bill that you have to pay no matter how much energy you use.

 

It is often expressed in pence per day (p/day) a unit rate which is a price for each unit of gas or electricity you consume. It is expressed in pence per kilowatt hours (p/kWh).

 

 

 

Ideally you should have closed/switched it 12 years ago.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy point taken about 12 years ago but who should I have switched to?

Under new rules ............ how come some suppliers don't have a standing charge are they breaking the rules?

Link to post
Share on other sites

More to the point what happened to previous 11 years Standing charges ?

 

Regulations from Ofgem ban gas and electricity suppliers from charging customers for energy used more than 12 months previous, if the error in billing is the supplier’s....but this is a standing charge...which obviously they have either failed to charge it or wrote it off?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy there was no standing charge it was introduced i believe circa 2013

unfortunately for me I was not aware that a standing charge had been introduced it was only when i sorted the mail (98% junk mail) that i came across the gas bill with the standing charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there's been no consumption and there's no contract in place, the standing charges are un-enforcable.

 

A deemed contract only comes in to force from the point at which you take supply. This is covered in the Utilities Act and Gas Act (can't remember the exact bit and not feeling well, but pointing this basic bit out should be enough)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy there was no standing charge it was introduced i believe circa 2013

unfortunately for me I was not aware that a standing charge had been introduced it was only when i sorted the mail (98% junk mail) that i came across the gas bill with the standing charge.

 

The following is from Jan 2000

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/601584.stm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there's been no consumption and there's no contract in place, the standing charges are un-enforcable.

 

A deemed contract only comes in to force from the point at which you take supply. This is covered in the Utilities Act and Gas Act (can't remember the exact bit and not feeling well, but pointing this basic bit out should be enough)

 

can someone point me to the exact wording please

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone point me to the exact wording please

 

Looking at s.8(1), as cited by CrappoMan

 

 

This gives :

"Where a gas supplier supplies gas to a consumer otherwise than in pursuance of a contract, the supplier shall be deemed to have contracted with the consumer for the supply of gas as from the time ( “the relevant time ”) when he began so to supply gas to the consumer."

 

This will rely on

A) you not having made a contract with BG, and them wanting to enforce a "deemed contract", while

B) They can only create the "deemed contract" when they "begin to supply gas", and

C) No gas had been used, so they have never supplied any, preventing the existence of a "deemed contract".

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have never taken any gas (meter reads same as 12 years ago and pipes terminate in external cabinet in wall), or signed a contract. the only time i ever contacted british gas was when i received the bill in 2015. So can i assume that i have a solid case or is there still an element of doubt as to the interpretation of the gas act.

 

ps big thank you to everyone for their help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's a pretty solid case here - you haven't taken supply so they haven't supplied you with anything.

 

There's some Ofgem guidance to suppliers on when a deemed contract exists - see https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/38477/guidance-deemed-contracts-standard-licence-condition-7.3-gas-and-electricity-supply-licences.pdf

 

"1.3. A deemed contract relationship will normally exist in circumstances where any type of

customer moves in to new premises, and starts to consume gas and/or electricity, without

agreeing a contract with a supplier."

 

Maybe print that and highlight it to them?

 

Do let us know how you get on, sorry I wasn't able to provide the exact details last night - thanks Bazzas for that :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

nottslad - many many thanks for that, I will definitely let you know how things transpire.

 

BankFodder - I decided against a SAR as that implies that I may have a contract, as far as I am aware they do not hold any personal details only details they have is 'The Occupier'

 

Thanks again everyone fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BG may rely on the estimated reading of 1413, an increase of 1 unit, to say that gas had been used.

Make sure they have the actual reading of 1412, then there can be no argument over whether gas has been used or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do let us know how you get on, sorry I wasn't able to provide the exact details last night - thanks Bazzas for that :)

 

No problem : it was an easy find given you and CrappoMan pointed the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CrappoMan - Glad you pointed that out, up to the bill for £176.63 (5th August 2015) the meter readings are shown as 1412 with £0.00 due. The bill dated 5th August 2015 shows an estimated reading of 1413. Future bills show an estimated reading of 1413 until the bill dated 11th March 2016 where the actual reading is 1412. I have since taken photograph evidence of the meter reading 1412 (last changed 1995).

 

Honest mistake I suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it capped off and have it reconnected when the place is habitable. You can then be a customer of anyone you like as there wont be an existing supplier.

BTW how can BG prove they are the supplier when no gas has been used and they dont have a name for their alleged account. You could have a n account with someone else and they wouldn't know because their records will be that far out of date they wont have any paperwork to show that you dont.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it capped off and have it reconnected when the place is habitable. You can then be a customer of anyone you like as there wont be an existing supplier.

BTW how can BG prove they are the supplier when no gas has been used and they dont have a name for their alleged account. You could have a n account with someone else and they wouldn't know because their records will be that far out of date they wont have any paperwork to show that you dont.

 

The national database XOServe, maintained by National Grid and used by all suppliers lists who the supplier is for every metering point on the grid (other than those maintained by Independent Gas Transporters. There's no paperwork involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...