Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA Group/judge and priestley Claimform - old HBOS Aqua Credit Card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am looking for a little advice.

 

I received a claim form from the county court business centre from the claimants Pra group.

 

I then completed a CCA request and CPR request,

which the claimant and their solicitors did not fulfil.

 

 

I filed my defence, and was updated by the claimant they would provide the documents in due course.

 

The claim was then allocated to the small claims track, and mediation was offered.

I had to refuse mediation due to not having all the documentation, which the mediators recommended.

 

Within two days the claimants solicitors sent all the documentation from the CPR and CCA requests,

not sure if they were trying to avoid mediation.

 

I have the signed agreement from the credit card but I am a little confused.

 

The agreement was signed by me on the 4/10/2011 with bank of Scotland Plc for an aqua credit card

and stamped with I guess an internal stamp on 10/10/2011.

 

The particulars of claim state that it was an agreement with progressive credit ltd entered into on the 12/10/2011.

As the dates and the company do not match is this an issue,

 

The particulars of claim state default was made on 18/7/2012 but that last payment was December 2011.

 

The assignment from progressive credit to aktiv kapita was on the 24/1/13

however the particulars of claim states 29/1/13.

All assignment documentation has been provided finally.

 

They have also provided me with the notice of assignment from activ kapital to Pra group,

but only the letter from Pra not activ kapital, is this sufficient?

 

Any advice would be welcomed, thank you.

 

It is just following the provision of documentation they have advised me to withdraw my defence,

and I am unsure if this is correct

 

 

how I would go about doing it,

as I do not want a ccj on my credit file,

and do not have the fund to pay in full.

 

I will set up a payment plan if they own the debt,

it is just it seems debts have been passed from pillar to post

and I want to ensure I am paying the right person for the correct debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lsiobhan1783 and Welcome to CAG

 

They ask everyone who submits a defence to withdraw (thats a template you have received)...saves them paying further fees to proceed.

 

As the particulars are inacurate and incorrect...they would be ill advised to proceed......ignore them until they make an attempt to lift the stay...then post back here for further advice.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date did you file you defence?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The devil is in the detail.

You say that there was an assignment from Progressive Credit to Aktiv Kapita

and you continue that there was a notice of assignment from Activ Kapital to PRA Group.

 

Was the first assignment really to Aktiv Kapita (no L) or do you mean Aktiv Kapital (with an L)?

If you mean Aktiv Kapital, what *exactly* is the rest of that company's title?

 

If the particulars of claim say one company (e.g. "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS" as the first assignee)

but the notice of assignment says a different company

(e.g. "Aktiv Kapital First Investments Limited")

then you are sitting on a successful defence.

 

How? Well,

always do a Subject Access Request to see which company's name appears on the notice of assignment.

If your credit card was with Progressive Credit (now called Newday)

and the notice of assignment says that they assigned the debt to "Aktiv Kapital First Investments Limited"

then "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS" was never assigned the debt.

 

 

If the county court claim states that "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS" was assigned the debt,

but the notice of assignment says it was a different Aktiv Kapital company,

then since "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS" was never assigned the debt,

then it couldn't have assigned the debt on to PRA Group.

That means that PRA Group has no legal standing to bring this claim at all.

 

 

The expression is "The Claimant has no locus standi", and it's enough to have PRA Group's claim struck out.

 

Whilst we're on the subject, PRA Group are currently wrongfully suing debtors of credit card companies around England on the basis that the debt was assigned to "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS" before it was assigned to them, when in fact the initial notices of assignment clearly state that debts were assigned to "Aktiv Kapital First Investments Limited".

 

This company, by the way, doesn't even exist! There used to be a Bermudan company called "Aktiv Kapital First Investment Limited" (without the S) but that is a completely different company because it doesn't have the S. In any case that Bermudan company went into a Members Voluntary Liquidation in 2013 and doesn't exist either.

 

Let's hope that the Financial Conduct Authority catch up with PRA Group's dodgy dealings soon and shut them down for good.

 

p.s. ALWAYS demand to see the Deed of Assignment too - not just the notice.

 

 

 

Hi, I am looking for a little advice.

 

I recieve a claim form from the county court business centre from the claimants Pra group.

 

I then completed a CCA request and CPR request, which the claimant and their solicitors did not fulfil. I filed my defence, and was updated by the claimant the would provide the documents in due course.

 

The claim was then allocated to the small claims track, and mediation was offered. I had to refuse mediation due to not having all the documentation, which the mediators recommended.

 

Within two days the claimants solicitors sent all the documentation from the CPR and CCA requests, not sure if they were trying to avoid mediation.

 

I have the signed agreement from the credit card but I am a little confused.

The agreement was signed by me on the 4/10/2011 with bank of Scotland Plc for an aqua credit card and stamped with I guess an internal stamp on 10/10/2011.

The particulars of claim state that it was an agreement with progressive credit ltd entered into on the 12/10/2011. As the dates and the company do not match is this an issue,

 

The particulars of claim state default was made on 18/7/2012 but that last payment was December 2011.

 

The assignment from progressive credit to aktiv kapita was on the 24/1/13 however the particulars of claim states 29/1/13. All assignment documentation has been provided finally.

 

They have also provided me with the notice of assignment from activ kapital to Pra group, but only the letter from Pra not activ kapital, is this sufficient?

 

Any advice would be welcomed, thank you.

 

It is just following the provision of documentation they have advised me to withdraw my defence, and I am unsure if this is correct and how I would go about doing it, as I do not want a ccj on my credit file, and do not have the fund to pay in full.

 

I will set up a payment plan if they own the debt, it is just it seems debts have been passed from pillar to post and I want to ensure I am paying the right person for the correct debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are all the same lot

wouldn't even both with NOA debacle 'route'

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thank you everyone for the replies.

 

I sent my defence on 3/5/2016.

 

The companies name on the particulars of claim and notice of assignment was "Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS Zug Brach".

 

Are the errors in their claim enough to defend it?

 

Also my defence was that they had not complied with CPA or CCA, do I need to amend this defence to state the particulars of claim are incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no your def is ok.

nothing to worry about.

 

so as its now June's end

the claim is well stayed.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter on Friday in a brown envelope stating it is a notice of transfer, to all parties that the small claims mediation department team has arranged for the case to be transferred to my local county court.

 

It states that details of the judges directions will be sent to you in a notice of allocation.

 

Is there anything I need to do in the interim, and do I need to update the claimant that the particulars of claim are incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

 

until:

 

 

details of the judges directions will be sent to you in a notice of allocation.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been sent the notice of allocation for 19th August 2016.

 

It states that's parties are encouraged to negotiate and the judges directions are:

6) Each party must deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on which that party intends to rely at the hearing no later than fourteen days before the hearing

7) the original documents must be brought to the hearing

8) the judge may refuse to consider a document or take it into account if a copy of it has not been sent to the other party as required by this order.

9) the documents to be sent to the other party and the court must include the statements of all witnesses (including the parties themselves)

10) witness statements must:

A) start with the name of the case and the claim number

B) state the full name and address of the witness

C) set out the witness's evidence clearly numbered paragraphs on numbered pages

D) end with this paragraph "..."

 

Is my evidence the documents the solicitors sent by email?

Also am I classing myself at a witness? Sorry I am very new to this.

 

Any advise would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

 

no

 

 

until:

 

 

details of the judges directions will be sent to you in a notice of allocation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have hi-lighted above in red the parts you must comply with by the dates stated.....this is known as standard disclosure and exchange of witness statements.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if the cpa and cpr have not been complied with ( the contract provided is with bank of Scotland yet the claim is for progressive claims Ltd, the notice of assignment have different dates) do I provide the documents the solicitors provided to me as the evidence? Also for witness statements would I be classed as a witness? If so what do I write? Thank you for pointing me in the right direction!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your disclosure is anything referred to or relied upon in your defence and witness statement...this is your evidence.

 

With regards to the form and content of a witness statement you will have to look around the Legal Success Forums and do some research...as you have only viewed 2 threads so far (including your own).

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...