Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

CRAR – Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery – allows landlords of commercial property to take control of (seize) goods belonging to the tenant to sell at auction to pay rent arrears. A court order is not required.

 

CRAR replaces the previous Common Law remedy of distress or distraint for rent. However, there are some key differences.

 

Under CRAR:

There must be a written lease in place

Only rent may be recovered, nothing else

CRAR may not be used for mixed use premises

The rent must be at least 7 days overdue

7 days’ notice of the landlord’s intention to exercise CRAR must be served

CRAR may only be enforced by a Certificated Enforcement Agent

 

Forfeiture was not affected by the introduction of The Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2014. It remains a Common Law right for landlords of commercial premises and permits them to terminate the lease before the contract end date because of a breach by the tenant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi honeybee13

 

Its Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery

 

It concerns a high court bailiff calling at our home and threatening to list our personal items and work van without giving us any notice they were calling. Even though they now say they sent a letter but it must be lost in the post.

We are trying to find out where we stand.

 

Hi Andyoch,

 

Do you know about the process of CRAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are a House Removal company. ploddertom.

We have now handed the keys back for the unit we was renting but they are saying they can still take possession of our personal goods in our home.

We have no stock and they only item that we own is a van that we use for our work which is now parked at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant by status is Sole Trader, partnership or Ltd Co. Were you in arrears - if so how much, did you have a lease? How long has the rent been owing - if indeed you do owe it?

 

What value would you put on the van?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Sole Trader

- Yes we was in arrears and did have a lease. T

 

 

he arrears are between £4500-£5500 about 18 months worth of rent.

 

 

not sure the exact amount and no seems to be able to give be an exact figure.

 

 

It was our stupidity really we haven't used the unit for 8 months but didn't hand the keys back.

So we do owe the rent. we buried our head.

 

Now this guy from the high enforcement services has turned up at home address and gave us an Avoidance Notice and forced us to make an agreement to pay of the arrears at an amount we can't really afford.

 

 

No prior notice was given even though they are now saying they posted us a 7 days notice and it must have been lost in the post.

 

He threatened to list our personal items and our work van which is at our home address to make us agree with the payment agreement.

 

I have spoken to the council who we owe the money and they have agreed a smaller amount of £150.00 a month but we still have to deal with the enforcement officer and not them and interest is being added on the debt.

 

The van is a 51 plate luton box van with 170000 mile on the clock cost me £2500 3 years ago

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the Van is sign Written.

 

I don't no what fees have been added as he left no paperwork as he said he didn't have the correct forms

 

 

he wrote the details on a form that was the wrong one

and said he would get it transferred over to the correct paperwork and send it us.

That was the 31st May.

 

The amount we agreed was £300 a month

 

Yes ploddertom but don't really understand if they should call at our home address and be able to take personal items when this was nothing to do with our business

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as the Council are amicable to being paid it is a shame it got to this stage in the first place.

 

 

I would hazard a guess that payments made via the enforcement agent will only result in minimal payments being forwarded to the Council as they will take their fees first.

 

Yes ploddertom but don't really understand if they should call at our home address and be able to take personal items when this was nothing to do with our business

 

As a Sole Trader you are responsible for the debts of the business and if there are no assets at the business address then I'm afraid they look to attending your home address for goods that may satisfy the debt.

 

Of course unless he can gain entry

- it would certainly be a bad idea to let him in voluntarily

- the only goods he may be able to take control of are those outside.

 

 

At risk here are any motor vehicles - has he given you a sheet listing any goods on it?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

he left no paperwork as he said he didn't have the correct forms he wrote the details on a form that was the wrong one and said he would get it transferred over to the correct paperwork and send it us.

 

When this little gem of a document arrives....please let us know on the forum !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ploddertom, He has already entered our house on the 31st. He was going to list our goods but the council rang him to stop it as they said he couldn't.

 

The works vehicle is parked outside but at the moment is not listed.

 

The unit was in my husbands name only and I am not part of the business what would happen if he sold me the van?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The unit was in my husbands name only and I am not part of the business what would happen if he sold me the van?

 

 

Too late for that unfortunately, there is nothing to stop you moving it though - well out of way. Let's just say he may have some problems given his stance with the paperwork.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so we have to wait for paperwork from them. How long should we wait? We don't really want them calling back out as the council said they charge for every call.

 

I have to go out now for a couple of hours but will check back this afternoon.

 

Thanks everyone for your help so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This cannot be CRAR as;

 

1. CRAR can only be used at the demised premises. (commercial only, no residential element attached)

2. CRAR has nothing to do with High Court Enforcement.

 

Something is not right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for unpaid rent yes but they haven't taken us to court for it.

apparently when they go down the Crar route they don't need to go to court first.

 

 

The idea is they hire a high enforcement officer who turn up at your business premises

and threaten to take your stock if you don't pay the arrears.

This is usually enough of a threat to make you pay up.

 

However we were not at the business premises when he called

he googled us and found out our home address and turned up there.

 

 

When we explained we do not have any stock and business premises was used to store furniture from house clearances

but is empty he then said he could take personal items from our home and our work van.

 

 

As he was just about to start listing our items the council rang him

and told him he couldn't list them as he had come to our home

as this is nothing to to do with the business.

 

After he left I found out I should have been given 7 working days notice before he came which I didn't get

but they are now saying they did send it but it must be lost in the post!!

They are going to send me a copy.

 

The only paperwork he left was an Avoidance notice.

 

The council will not give me a straight answer

and are telling me t deal with them direct but I wondering if the Crar is valid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget CRAR, it hasn't been used it seems, it seems the council have taken you to Court and then transferred the matter to the High Court for enforcement.

 

What is the "Avoidance notice" I've never heard of it and it's not a prescribed form for taking control of goods

 

One of the other helpful members will be along soon to help, but it seems to me either something has gone wrong with the enforcement route or the full story isn't apparent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council haven't taken us to court, I asked the council and they said no they do not need to go to court first,

as they are going down the CRAR route where they pass this on to the court enforcement services to deal with.

 

The avoidance notice is the first letter we received from the Court Enforcement Service

which he handed us when he came to our home.

 

 

It says - I have visited the date and time stated above in relation to an enforcement power exercisable

in accordance with part 3 of the TRIBUNALS, COURT AND ENFORCEMENT ACT

 

My intention was to take control of goods in order to recover the sum of money associated with a writ

or warrant of control

 

If you fail to contact me within hours I may apply to the court for a warrant of entry

as provided within paragraph of the Tribunals,courts and enforcement act.

 

This is the first contact we have had from the court enforcement services

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRAR only allows seizure of goods at the premises reneted/leased from the plaintiff,

they cannot take anything from anywhere else and that includes the van.

 

 

As siad earlier it can also mean immediate forfeiture of the lease

but if there is nothing at the premises the bailiff has to walk away

and the landlord then has to sue you in the normal way.

 

 

The bloke who turned up on your doorstep is nothing but a liar

and has no rights when he is there in that capacity.

 

 

If you know the name of the company he works for

then a complaint to trading standards will be the minimum as a first step.

 

 

However, to be certain that you havent had a court judgement entered against you via the business address

you should check with the courts service on both your name, business name and both addresses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRAR is only available for use at the demised premises only! Not your home address, next door or your mates house.

 

It has nothing to do with a High Court Enforcement Officer or High Court Bailiff as you put it, only a Certificated Enforcement Agent.

 

The first letter you will get is a notice of enforcement not an "avoidance notice"

 

Court Enforcement Services is a private company headed up by ex Marston directors and a HCEO

and I'm guessing the name they use is to try and make it look like some form of official court department.

 

Also Forfeiture cannot be done at the same time as CRAR or vice versa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ericsbrother, Thats what I was trying to find out.

 

So now if I pay the council direct the agreed monthly payment instead of the enforcement services there is nothing they can do. Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...