Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West and Capquest chasing old credit card debt


Pathway
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:-)Hi

 

Have 2 NatWest credit cards taken out about 1995/1996 - on which I have been making token payments of

£2 per month which just jogs along. £1400 outstanding on one card - £2200 on the other card.

 

Token payments commenced about 2 years ago as lost job due to illness and have not worked since.

 

I am 65 and now have heart failure problems - so trying to sort out affairs in case of further problems.

 

I know I should CCA them - but what then. Do they write off debts? My GP can confirm my health position. It's crazy really - we all bailed out

NatWest during banking crisis to the tune of some £20K+ each - so in effect they owe us!

 

Your advices how to proceed would be greatly appreciated. Would it help to go through Citizens Advice or similar? Let me know what you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pathway,

Are these token payments made to Natwest/Triton or a DCA?

Send a CCA request for each of the accounts (CCA letter in the templates section), make ssure you enclose a £1 postal order for each one and print your name, do not sign and send via recorded delivery.

When/if you recieve anything back, post up but remove personal details and barcodes and full amount for your own security reasons to stop being identified.

As to bailing out the banks, yes the UK Government did stick us all in 15K worth of debt each, I would love to put my 2p's worth in but if I did this would go seriously off topic.

Best Wishes

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a very good chance that they will not have the documentation to enforce through a Court. Basically what that means is that the debt still exists but is not enforceable.

 

I myself am at the same stage of life so know exactly what you are feeling and trying to achieve.

 

It is not the remit of this site to encourange avoidance of debt, but, on the other hand the reality of your situation, (as mine) is that by making these small payments the debt is going to long outlive us.

 

In my situation (with NW) I went down the CCA route and once satisfied that they have no enforceable documentation, I sent a letter taken from another site before I found CAG about ill-health and age. I have neither made any further payments, nor heard a word about these accounts for several years now. They still appear on my CRA files, but as at my time in life I would never want credit again, this is a minor irritation. On this point, each payment made re-sets the SB clock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hello

 

After a long time The Financial Ombudsman instructed NatWest to pay out on my ppi claim.

 

However, Nat West have sent the payment to their Credit Card Centre as there is approx £400 outstanding

which is all DISPUTED interest and fee charges.

 

I know about the right of set off etc - but as the £400 is disputed I believe their action to be unfair as they propose

to deduct the £400 from claim.

 

any advices would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

After a long time The Financial Ombudsman instructed NatWest to pay out on my ppi claim.

 

However, Nat West have sent the payment to their Credit Card Centre as there is approx £400 outstanding

which is all DISPUTED interest and fee charges.

 

I know about the right of set off etc - but as the £400 is disputed I believe their action to be unfair as they propose

to deduct the £400 from claim.

 

any advices would be appreciated.

 

Surely you could let them off-set and claim back the charges from the Credit Card, using the same method as PPI.

 

Numerous people have won back the charges on these forums

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hello

 

I have old credit card debt on a NatWest credit card.

 

I had been making nominal £1 payments a month for the last 4 plus years or more until last June 2015 and they passed to Moorcroft.

 

The balance is £1200 but I dispute £700 of it - mostly interest and charges.

 

Nat West have now passed the debt from Moorcroft to Cap Quest.

 

I am totally fed up with the whole thing.

 

What is the best thing for me to do. I am fed up with all this harassment. I am 71 years old and have heart problems etc.

 

How do I draw this thing to a conclusion?

 

Your advices would be appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pathway

 

I would suggest sending a CCA Request to see if there is a Consumer Credit Agreement available.

You could also raise a complaint about the charges and attempt to reclaim them too x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello

 

Have a debt with NATWEST which is being passed from one debt agency - they give up and then NATWEST pass to another debt agency.

 

In the old days under the OFT this practice was against their guidelines.

 

Now the OFT is no longer there - do I complain to Financial Conduct Authority?

 

Your advices would be appreciated.

 

Iam 71 years old and have several serious health conditions and this is driving me mad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the credit card?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you have made a cca request under s78?when was the ac opened?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sev threads merged for history

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not have one to supply.

 

Hi Pathway, just out of curiosity do you know why NatWest passed the debt to a DCA?

 

I'd guess it's because they don't have a valid cca (as you mentioned above)

and therefore they've passed it to the cash cow experts!

 

I'm not a lot younger than you, I took out my NatWest credit card in 1997, and defaulted in 2006.

 

When I cca'd them they did produce a valid agreement (which I had checked).

 

I'd been paying them £2 per month, now reduced to £1 per month.

 

However they informed me that the debt would only be passed to a DCA if I missed any payments.

 

My next review is in six months time.

 

My debt is around £8k

- I have offered them a 30% F&F (from my daughter) which they refused,

even though they know I've no assets.

 

I wish I was in your position where they can't locate your agreement,

I think you're on a winner here, the experts on here will give you good advice.

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for yr messages.

 

I was also paying £! per month till June last year. I have disputed the balance.

So they have passed the account to Moorcroft - which has now been passed to Capquest.

Under the OFT (when they existed) it was bad practice to pass from one dca to another!

 

So do the FCA now consider this to be bad practice?

 

Who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

makes no odds..

 

 

send a CCA request to whomever is chasing you.

or the named owner on your credit file...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...