Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. You contacted directly with the parcel broker so your best option is to proceed directly against them for breach of contract. I hope you have read enough to understand that you will not be able to rely on the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Do you understand why? Have Parcel to Go giving you a reason for declining reimbursement? Do you have anything in writing from your customer which shows that they did not refuse delivery and which identifies the actual circumstances of the situation?
    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells chasing almost statute barred cap1 card debt


Craigbadger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, just after a bit of advice here.

 

I have been behind and over my limit for about 12 months but had been making regular payment all be it not enough for my account to be up to date. Today I recieved a letter. It said the following.

 

Overdue amount: £.....

 

 

IMPORTANT YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

Notice of Default served under section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974

 

Youve broken your agreement ........

 

You must pay the amount overdue shown above. This payment must reach your account within 28 days of this letter.

 

If youve already paid this or have made a payment agreement with - thank you. Please ignore this letter.

 

Then it lists what they will do if I dont do the above ie shut account, chase debt.

 

 

 

 

What I want to know is, I spoke to them monday and paid 70% of the above and agreed to pay the remainder of the arrears by friday. He did mention that a letter had been sent out but told me if I paid this it would be canceled.

 

What I want to know is will they stick to there word?.

Is this an actual default notice as I dont remember recieving a warning?

Should I ring up and pay it today and argue that I didnt recieve the letter till friday or something because of the snow(foot deep here today).

When he says canceled does that mean its already been put on my file and they will just change to satisfied or will it actually be removed or not even be added?.

Will they have recordings of the call where he promised it would be removed on payment of the arrears and could I request that if need be?.

 

 

 

Sorry to waffle, I know I have been a bit slack with payments but have my reasons and despite my current position, being 29 I could do without any nasty marks on my credit file and the letter seems a bit confusing, maybe deliberate to get me to pay I dont know?

Thanks for your time, any advice would be much apprecieted. :)

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not entirely sure exactly what you're asking or what you're worried about, so I'll try to answer each bit separately.

 

Hi, just after a bit of advice here.

Basically I have been behind and over my limit for about 12 months but had been making regular payment all be it not enough for my account to be up to date. Today I recieved a letter. It said the following.

 

Overdue amount: £.....

 

 

IMPORTANT YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

Notice of Default served under section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974

 

Youve broken your agreement ........

 

You must pay the amount overdue shown above. This payment must reach your account within 28 days of this letter.

 

If youve already paid this or have made a payment agreement with - thank you. Please ignore this letter.

 

Then it lists what they will do if I dont do the above ie shut account, chase debt.

 

This is a default notice. I'm no expert on default notices, but aren't they supposed to give you 28 days from when you received it? Just in case it may be needed at some point, write on the letter the date you received it and keep the envelope it came in. Staple them together, firmly!

 

 

What I want to know is, I spoke to them monday and paid 70% of the above and agreed to pay the remainder of the arrears by friday. He did mention that a letter had been sent out but told me if I paid this it would be canceled.

 

Obviously the default notice is the letter you mentioned. If you are able to without leaving yourself short for priorities such as food, then stick to what you agreed.

What I want to know is will they stick to there word?.

If you pay by Friday, that's well within the time allowed by their default notice so you've put the account back in order and it will be as if the notice was never issued.

Is this an actual default notice as I dont remember recieving a warning?

 

No warning is required.

Should I ring up and pay it today and argue that I didnt recieve the letter till friday or something because of the snow(foot deep here today).

 

Just stick to what you agreed if you can, or if you can't try to pay within the time they've given you. If you can't do that either, then ask for more help.

When he says canceled does that mean its already been put on my file and they will just change to satisfied or will it actually be removed or not even be added?.

 

As I said above, so long as you put the account back in order within the time given, it's as if the notice was never issued. I think you may be confusing a default notice under the CCA with a default on your credit file. They are extremely unlikely to have put a default on your credit file already since technically you are not yet in default since you still have time to put things right. If you're worried about that you could check your credit file (but leave it 4-6 weeks since it can take that long to show up) and if they have put a default marker on you could challenge it.

Will they have recordings of the call where he promised it would be removed on payment of the arrears and could I request that if need be?.

 

You shouldn't need it. From now on it might be wise to take account of the standard advice on the forum and only speak to people on the phone about something that could later be disputed if you have the means to record it yourself.

 

 

 

Sorry to waffle, I know I have been a bit slack with payments but have my reasons and despite my current position, being 29 I could do without any nasty marks on my credit file and the letter seems a bit confusing, maybe deliberate to get me to pay I dont know?

Thanks for your time, any advice would be much apprecieted. :)

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since it's rather unusual on this forum to find a creditor sticking to their word, would you mind naming them?

 

I'm sure they won't mind getting some positive feedback for a change!

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you have been over your limit and behind for the last 12 months, I expect this will be reflected on the CRA's anyway.

 

Don't let them bully you into paying if you cannot afford it, ensure that your priority debts are paid first.

 

But if you have satisfied the default notice, then they shouldn't register it, but don't bank on it or rely on ANYTHING they say!

 

It is really best to avoid talking to them on the phone if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the notice is defective anyway

the payby date must specify an actual calendar date NOT XX days from the date of this letter or any other date they may pick out the woodworm.

 

Cap1 send out a variety of these letters, none of which ARE an actual default notice [it must use those exact words] they are just letters telling you that you have a 'default' in the way you have [not yet] paid them.

 

there is a very good thread on defective default notices, use the search in the blue bar above.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That effort at a Default Notice is pitiful since it doesn't comply with the regulations set by the CCA.

 

Have a look here for full explanation

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1911404.html

 

There are also regs about specific prominence being given to some words

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2659619.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just wondered, I sent a request almost 2 weeks ago. I'd of thought they'd of come up with a copy of this pretty quickly. Ah well no news is good news(as they say).

Its a funny one though, i'm sure I applied online but think there may of been some paperwork to sign etc aswell. Ah well we'll see, or not. Infact my old dear throws nothing so i'll have a wade through see if I can find anything.

Was May 2005 btw

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, recieved this today, posted up on MSE and he thinks its enforceable because it references to the t&c however there is no actual scan of the reverse sheet(which ive seen others recieve) just 5 pages of t&c (which look generic).

 

Ive seen a fair few of these on here which people say are unenforcable so just wondered what you think of this?, and has anyone had any experience with being taken to court on the strength of 1 of these?.

 

In simple i'm screwed, arrears are over a months wages and 3 months late, balance is well into 5 figures, apr is 36 and ive got no chance of paying it off or even clearing the arrears so if they are likely to take me to court i'd rather know.

 

Just after your views(preferably with experience) on where I should go, ive nothing to lose so open to ideas, gonna default shortly i'm sure :D

 

http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af299/badgercraig/caponeccaedited.jpg

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not enforceable because it doesn't contain all the prescribed terms. It may refer to T&Cs but there is no link to them nor are the prescribed terms within the 4 corners of the signed agreement. Send them this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2009 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a document which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I refer to page 5 of the guidance which states;

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Print name do not sign

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right I sent that letter last week and theyve not called since friday which considering they were calling both phones 4+ times a day is pretty refreshing. Maybe theyve realised its a waste of time.

 

Is it time to worry or this just the calm before the storm?

Now about 11 weeks without any payment so surely the defaults gotta come soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd spend my time lodging formal complaints to the relevant bodies about their harassment via the phone.

 

Ofcom

 

Telecommunications Act 1984 (c. 12) - Statute Law Database

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

13 weeks no payment, £1200 arrears but no default notice. They sent me one in Jan for £412 which was removed as it was paid within 14 days and nothing was ever added to my credit history.

I have put the account into dispute on grounds of dodgy cca and they never responded.

Is this normal or is there a chance theyve messed something up or actually respecting my dispute?. Nothing on my record and they updated it 6 weeks ago showing 2 months arrears.

I guess its a matter of waiting(which is the bad bit).

 

Be curious to get opinions though considering the first notice came after 1 missed payment and being over limit a bit for a few months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you rememdied the first default, so why did you decide to CCA?

 

Some companies will respond to a CCA and some won't... but they normally do at some point, especially if it's the original creditor. How long ago did you CCA?.... 13 weeks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for looking.

I did not even know I could query the cca till I found this site after recieving and paying the first default, I had to borrow of my parents to desperately clear the debt.

I CCA'd them because I realised that despite paying 3.5k in the previous 12 months and not using the card, the balance had dropped less than £100, agreement had gone from 6% to 35.9 on a large balance, they were totally unsympathetic to my change in circumstances(broken ankle late last year, i'm self employed so no pay other than the small amount of benefits), I sold everything I owned to keep up payments and maxed out everything. I thought this was grounds for having a look at my agreement + the fact I genuinely cannot afford to pay it anymore and was considering bankruptcy due to the dire state of my finances, I had little to lose. I'd never clear this debt in 6 years or even 60 so figured i'll take the default rather than the bankruptcy.

 

They responded to my CCA request with a Signature page with no terms and a generic t&c within the 12 days so I wrote back with a letter which cerberusalert posted up, this was about a month ago at a guess.

 

I guess its just the lack of contact from them thats confusing me.

 

Interestingly I checked with Equifax and they are showing 3 payments in arrears dated 2 weeks before the Experian mark showing 2.

 

They seem like a well oiled ship:rolleyes:

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a horrendous leap in interest!

 

Sounds like they may have decided to penalise you for defaulting even though you cleared it at the time.

 

Wait and see what they come back with but don't get into any conversations over the 'phone.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...