Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Thank you for the information, we can start looking at your case now. If you were thinking of doing it, please don't appeal, it causes more problems than it solves because Met and other PPCs almost never allow appeals. DR+ can't do anything to you because they're debt collectors, just part of the letter trail. If it ever went to court it would be Met doing it, or their lawyers. If you have a look around the forum, you'll see we have dozens of threads about the Stansted car park. Read some threads and you'll see how these outfits work. Best, HB
    • I know now, but always thought that if the transaction was excepted by card only way a customer could get a refund is by taking the goods back to get their money back 
    • Hello  Please help, as today I received a letter re. debt recovery.  Is there anything I can do at this stage? The driver fell foul of the confusing car parking situation re. Starbucks and McDonald's. 1 Date of the infringement 13/02/24 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 5/3/24 3 Date received 7/3/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? CCTV photos 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here  Final reminder on 9/4/24 & Debt Recovery letter dated 30/4/24 In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY Parking charge (1).pdf
    • Yes I can imagine that kind of thing rankles a lot. I don't know what the timescale is for making chargeback claims. I suggest that you find out and then change your way working so that you keep records at least until then. It may be six months
    • no need to use @username just type. please fill out the sticky  as it asks  dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Broadband firms face new advert rules in the UK


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The UK's broadband providers have been told to expect tougher rules on how they advertise their services.

 

The UK's Advertising Standards Authority said it was considering the step to ensure people "aren't misled by pricing claims".

 

It follows a study that indicated most users could not correctly calculate bills based on the information given in a selection of broadband ads.

 

The ASA said it would make a final decision before June.

 

A lobby group representing the broadband industry has suggested more research is needed before any changes are imposed.

 

But one of the internet service providers has already said it supports reform.

 

"It's obvious that a single headline price is much clearer and better for customers, and we're actually already doing it on a pilot project up in York," said a spokesman for TalkTalk.

 

"But until the whole market moves to single prices, any company that advertises its products like this will struggle to compete with what look like better deals from other providers."

 

 

 

The announcement comes a month after the charity Citizens Advice called on the ASA to review its code of practice because it said consumers were being misled by attractive-sounding broadband offers.

 

Full Article

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate the "£10 a month broadband for 12 months!", then to see "Not including £14.99 BT line rental" in the small print.

 

And so do I. This is right on par with the airlines and their flights for 50p then a hundred other add ons in the small print. That's been stopped, now it's time to do the same with the bb suppliers.

 

It's all done on purpose, it's just a con. Why can't companies be fair and honest for once instead of deliberately laying out there ads to deceive people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need to have to have a phone included in the price when the likes of Virgin now offer Internet without it...

 

Most companies still deliver internet via your Phone Line, hence the requirement for a phone line to be installed which incurs Line Rental.

Virgin can only offer Internet without because their internet is delivered via a dedicated Cable rather than via your phone line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin can only offer Internet without because their internet is delivered via a dedicated Cable rather than via your phone line.

 

I am in a Virgin cabled area and can get broadband only for £30.25. Alternatively, I can take their broadband and phone package for a mere £5.99 per month for the first 12 months and then £19 per month thereafter (18 month contract). In the small print, I am also required to take a Virgin phone line for £17.99, so that makes it £23.98 for the first 12 months and £36.99 thereafter.

 

So whilst I could have a super fast 50Mbps service without a phone, it works out more expensive to do so. In addition, Virgin will offer several sweeteners when you come to leave, so their advertised price isn't always what you pay.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in a Virgin cabled area and can get broadband only for £30.25. Alternatively, I can take their broadband and phone package for a mere £5.99 per month for the first 12 months and then £19 per month thereafter (18 month contract). In the small print, I am also required to take a Virgin phone line for £17.99, so that makes it £23.98 for the first 12 months and £36.99 thereafter.

 

So whilst I could have a super fast 50Mbps service without a phone, it works out more expensive to do so. In addition, Virgin will offer several sweeteners when you come to leave, so their advertised price isn't always what you pay.

Yeah it's weird that they make it cheaper to have a phone line and internet line than to just have the internet line. I've never understood why they do it, nor ever gotten an answer from Virgin Media themselves on why that's the case. Whether you have the phone line or not, the internet line that goes in is exactly the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...