Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can anyone assure me that the District Judges are not influenced by minority religious/political groups


sharburrys
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They do benefit when the counsel invoices to his client and the company reduces their VAT amount to pay when they reclaim it as they paid the invoice because remember I am paying directly to the company not to the counsel so they use the receipt for themselves

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The lady over the phone said there is no transcript or recordings in this case

It is going to be another statistical number? We dealt with this many complaints!!!

So do I have a legal right to start an online petition? Or is there any time limit to appeal?

if you are to complain about a judge or the like, then as connif posted, time limit is 3 mths. ie consistent with judicial review.

appealing a judgment has its own time limits. see the civil procedure rules re appeals.

you could also enquire, as mentioned, whether you are able to get a copy of the court file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your opinion is there something unusual the way the judge handled if all the statements I made above are correct?

 

Some judges are good, some aren't. Sadly it can be luck of the draw. What is unusual is to award costs for SCT. Why did he do that?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like citizen said CPR27.14

I promise you that the judge did not manage the case the second defendants counsel managed the whole case whatever he said, he accepted!

I have never seen such case like this.

Also I had to stop the case to go to the toilet to refresh myself as I felt like I was in a police custody

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lady over the phone said there is no transcript or recordings in this case

It is going to be another statistical number? We dealt with this many complaints!!!

So do I have a legal right to start an online petition? Or is there any time limit to appeal?

 

Definitley a time limit if you want to comlain about a judge... 4 weeks, I think...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very difficult to prove bias.

 

In Metropolitan Properties Co. (F.G.C.) Ltd v Lannon [1969] Lord Denning M.R. had this to say "In considering whether there was a real likelihood of bias, the court does not look at the mind of the justice himself or at the mind of the chairman of the tribunal, or whoever it may be, who sits in judicial capacity. It does not look to see if there was a real likelihood that he would, or did, in fact favour one side at the expense of the other".

 

Denning also goes on to say "Surmise or conjecture is not enough" to challenge the impartiality of the Judge, but circumstances must bring about the real likelihood of bias.

 

Porter vs Magil [2002], Lord Hope (aptly named I might add) phrased the problem in the following manner; "the question is whether the fair minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was bias".

 

If you want to complain about the personal conduct of a judge, member of a small tribunal or coroner you should write to the Office for Judicial Complaints by post or email. If for any reason you are unable to make your complaint in writing, please telephone us and we will be pleased to help you.

 

 

Alternatively, write to us by post or by email making sure you include the following information:

 

your name, address and telephone number

the name of the judge / tribunal member / coroner, the court / tribunal hearing centre, the number of the case, the date of the hearing

specific details about the grounds of your complaint

Send your complaint to:

 

The Office for Judicial Complaints

4th Floor, Clive House

Petty France

London SW1H 9HD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what are the possible outcome?

If I were to appeal the case which I am not very sure if I am gone pass the time but if I do; how does it work? Why am I going to appeal the decision for?

Judge being unreasonable?

Judge's decision is allowing a potential tax evasion? As an individual I am paying the counsels vat and the company is reclaiming the vat that I paid for?

Judge s decision contradicting itself? - not enough evidence vs CPR27.14 being unreasonable?

 

Or may be the best reasons I can put the

The judge was having a bad day or even

The judge has a romantic relationship with the defendant :)

How many reasons can I list?

 

My last question

What is my legal right to start an online petition for the judge being investigated professionally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did the judge award costs against you? That is very, very rare on the Small Claims Track. What did the Judge say?

 

My (non-lawyer) understanding is that you cannot appeal on findings of fact (i.e. the judge's determination of what happened) but only either an error in law (i.e. a wrong legal principle applied) or an error of process/procedure.

 

But you have been so unclear about what actually happened, I'm not sure anyone can advise you on how to proceed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok here is the details

 

A company Lorry hit my car whilst in parking position - company A

I hired a management company to arrange all the legalities rather than going through my insurance - company B

These guys went backwards and forwards for 1 year 4 months no outcome apart from repairing my car

 

My broken device in the car was left and I had to take time off as well as the management company went to my insurance which increased my premium next year

 

I took both companies to the court

1- for the damage and the loss of earnings based on traffic and motor act....

2- I took the other company for increasing my premium and taking time off from work as they have not fulfilled their promise as they said they would recover all my cost and damage

 

The judge came very sleepy and tired

And admitted that he didn't read the case asked the defendants counsel to represent the case to the judge

Then he listened to me however he said

"As you are representing yourself, the counsels will question you but you can't ask any questions to them"

Bear in your mind I am the claimant they are the defendant

Then he said

There is not enough evidence to prove or not report from the manufacturer whether the device is repairable or not and what is the repair cost as I only provided a like to like new device cost

Then he dismissed the case and added CPR27.14 defendant to pay their fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read of PD 27

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part27/pd_part27#8.1

 

You may appeal against a judgment in the small claims track only if the court made a mistake in law or there was a serious irregularity in the proceedings.

 

If you want to appeal, you must file a notice of appeal within 21 days from the date of the decision, unless the court has given a different time limit.

 

A fee is payable unless you are entitled to a fee remission.

 

If you want to appeal against a decision in the small claims track, you should consult a solicitor or an experienced adviser.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy

Nice to see you again,

What you are saying is basically I will need to swallow it up? Beside of my lack of experience? If the 21 days gone pass?

Also is this not a major mistake

 

1 - the decision contradicts itself with the case being dismissed because not enough evidence and paying the defendants fees in a small claims tracking

2- I was penalised to pay a VAT element which I have not been invoiced for

3 - conflict of interest the defendants counsel represented my case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian still waiting for a response what will happen if I were to start an online petition against the judge?

Am I allowed to?

 

We would not permit you to start an online petition on CAG for such a reason.

 

However, you could try one of the e-petition sites.

 

As to what would happen, who knows - some petitions take off, others don't. If you are able to start one on the government e petition site, you need a certain about of votes for it to be heard or dealt with.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do i put the full name of the judge? Would it not be classified a kind of defamation of character?

 

I think you would need to word your petition very carefully and certainly not name the Judge on a petition. A Judge, or A Judge sitting at X Court might be acceptable.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy

Nice to see you again,

What you are saying is basically I will need to swallow it up? Beside of my lack of experience? If the 21 days gone pass?

Also is this not a major mistake

 

1 - the decision contradicts itself with the case being dismissed because not enough evidence and paying the defendants fees in a small claims tracking

2- I was penalised to pay a VAT element which I have not been invoiced for

3 - conflict of interest the defendants counsel represented my case?

 

Under a costs order VAT is recoverable on the costs being paid unless the party receiving the costs is a business registered for VAT. In that event that party will recover the costs through their VAT return in the normal way, and then just recover the net of that amount from the paying party. In other words, VAT is claimed back from the government or the payer, not both.

 

Sometimes a VAT registered person is only entitled to claim a proportion of their VAT back through the VAT return, not all of it. In that event they can claim the rest from the payer.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We would not permit you to start an online petition on CAG for such a reason.

 

However, you could try one of the e-petition sites.

 

As to what would happen, who knows - some petitions take off, others don't. If you are able to start one on the government e petition site, you need a certain about of votes for it to be heard or dealt with.

 

Not sure a petition is the way forward….

 

 

Standards for petitions

We’ll reject your petition if it’s:

 

not clear what you're asking for

about something that the UK Government or Parliament is not responsible for

about something that’s the responsibility of a devolved body (eg the Scottish Parliament)

about a purely personal issue

confidential, libellous, false or defamatory

contains language that may cause offence, or is provocative or extreme in its views deceptive or misleading

advertising or spam

nonsensical, or a joke

party political

about honours or appointments – there’s a different way to nominate someone for an honour

breaks the law or violates intellectual property rights

covered by a court order, injunction or is about a case that’s active in the UK courts

potentially confidential, commercially sensitive or might cause someone distress or financial loss

names people working in public bodies (except for senior management)

names family members of elected officials or people working in public bodies

names someone who has been accused of a crime, or contains information that may identify them

a Freedom of Information (FOI) request – there’s a different way to make an FOI request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...