Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

WTC Query?


Rocketronnie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all I have a couple of question about mine and my partners WTC claim as we are new to claim WTC.

 

My partner works 33 hours a week at NMW and I worked 15 hrs a week but my contract came to an end at the end of November, we have been claiming WTC since April.

 

I have checked entitled to website and says we are still entitled to the same amount of WTC.

 

Questions are do I need to inform the HMRC of the change of income even though they won't be a change in amount received or can I just wait till the renewal forms in April? Is they any negative effects of not informing them and waiting on the renewal?

 

Also on to the question of renewal our income for year 15/16 will be lower than 16/17 so on the renewal forms can you put down how much your going to earn for the year 16/17 instead of going off the years 15/16 income? As it is going to be about £5,000 less for the year 16/17.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A change of circumstances is required if your money goes up OR down. Be safe a make the decision to notify this way you will always have the correct details registered. Also if you do not do so it could come back to haunt you later on...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it not be a good idea to pay the unwanted income into a savings account then when they do come after you for over payments you have proof you have not used it and can repay immediately. Make sure you have a record of you informing them with dates and copies of letters and transcripts of your notes f Tele calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is one option and up to you. But as advised I wouldn't do that. Why, because if you fail to notify a change within a reasonable time (21) days you could get a penalty for it and that could be 1000's or nothing or anything in between again that's up to you.

 

You could also get prosecuted for it too. But again that's up to you. I am just answering your query here and giving as many options as is reasonable.

 

Finally getting a criminal record is it really worth the cost of a letter? Please do the right thing and declare a change of circumstances...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rocketronnie, what you have described is a change of circumstances.

 

You must notify the appropriate authority of any change of circumstances immediately however trivial it may seem to you, or whatever 'advice' you may have gleaned from any other source.

 

Asking the appropriate authorities that you notify to confirm to you in writing what, if anything, more you need to do would put the onus on them to give you the right advice.

 

Make sure you keep records/evidence of having done so. Failure to do this could result in all sorts of grief later on. Make sure, too, that you have confirmation in writing of the effect, or not, that the change of circumstances may/may not have.

 

Income for the financial year 15/16 cannot be definitively determined until the end of the period. Any figures you use now can only be an estimate based on the current position. Likewise for future years.

Mikeymack could not have made the position clearer, ignore his advice at your peril.

 

 

If you can provide a link to the website that you have got the information from that might help us to determine its veracity, but however reliable it may be, the fact remains that you must report changes of circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading all the advice here I decided that it's probably in mine/my partners interests is to inform them as I wasn't sure about the change of circumstances/phone call malarkey.

 

Anywho I rang them he made the changes to our account and said it will be 4/6 weeks and I will get a revised tax credit notification and we will be still entitled to them since my partner is working over 30 hours and payments will continue at the same rate until the revision is done and will then either go up or down.

 

Thanks for all the sound advice :) .

Link to post
Share on other sites

We try to help posters not to fall into the overpayment trap. This would mean you paying back a debt that was not needed to be dealt with. It just makes great sense in dealing with it at the earliest opportunity and getting HMRC to work out what you are due and to process your claims correctly...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...