Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

parking eye scottish aldi car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You must write to PE with the very brief denial and kill the claim now, if you ignore they will take you to court and although you will win do you really want to waste your valuable time and lose money for being off work etc to defend somehting that can be buried with a 1 line letter now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have written a letter to send to ParkingEye as follows

 

As registered keeper of the vehicle, I do not accept any liability, and that ParkingEye LTD provide strict proof of any evidence oft heir contract being formed with the keeper of the vehicle.

Yours faithfully

Printed Name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as you're in Scotland and ParkingLie wouldn't have a leg to stand on as far as a court case is concerned, you probably could just ignore them.

 

However, it's much more fun to waste their time biggrin.png

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We have received a reply from ParkingEye today, it is a standard letter with FAQs, it tells of cases where drivers took on the company and lost.

PARKINGEYE must accept or reject my appeal within 35 days ?.

The clause to which this argument refers to has been amended and has been made accessible to the general public in the latest British parking Association code of practice ( October 2014 )

In order for ParkingEye to cancel this Parking Charge, we will need valid evidence indicating that you did not break the terms and conditions stipulated on the signage.

This Parking Charge has been put on hold for 14 days in order for you to provide additional/ further evidence

Yours faithfully,

ParkingEye Legal Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

"we will need valid evidence indicating that you did not break the terms and conditions stipulated on the signage."

 

How can you prove a negative?

Nothing to worry about. I don't think I have seen one case where Aldi customers have been taken to court. There might be a "do not take our customers to court" clause in the contract as per PE and Somerfield. Additionally, I don't think they have ever chanced their arm in the Scottish court system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for them to prove that you DID break the terms and conditions rather than for you to prove that you didn't.

 

It's Scotland so no POFA, so unless you have identified the driver in your appeal I'd send them a cease and desist letter, and threaten them with a complaint for harassment if they continue to pursue you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking utter cobblers. If there is a contract between you and them that cannot be altered by reference to a code that they are obliged to follow. The best thing to do is to ignore them and when they write again you again deny any contractual obligation under Scottish law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DBC, Cardiff Devil and Erics brother, of all the claims that ParkingEye have quoted in their letter, none of them have taken place in Scotland, it is like they are ignoring the legal system in Scotland to bluff their cause. Years ago when wheel clamping started, their was a clamping company operating in Edinburgh clamping Cars, a driver took the case to Court, where it was ruled that Clamping Cars in Scotland is illegal, as it is gaining money by extortion. In the meantime I will ignore ParkingLie if and until they contact us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

you are in Scotland

 

 

you TOTALLY IGNORE any private parking speculative invoices

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will reiterate,

the PoFA doesnt apply to Scotland so there can be no keeper liability.

 

 

This means that the parking co has got your details from the DVLA by misrepresentation, a criminal offence (but no-one will ever do anything about that)

 

 

. If they can identify the driver at the time then a contract can be formed between the parking co

and them but the contract must be correctly worded as there is no such thing as trespass in Scotland

so anyone BREACHING a contract can claim trespass rather than a contractual obligation

and then it all goes pear shaped for the parking co.

 

Since PE rely on ANPR they can never say who was driving so they dont hav a leg to stand on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stuartc1,

I sent ParkingEye a short letter, details are posted on March in this thread, and I never heard from them again,

there is now more knowledge posted on here as regard to Parking on private Land in Scotland, and you are being given good advice on here.

If there is a Halfords on the site then chances are it is the same car park.

ParkingEye have not responded since March, thanks to everyone for the help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all.

Can you advise? I ignored the letter for a while then PE got debit recovery plus to recover the money. I wrote a email to this company as was noted in the previous posts and they have come back with.:-

 

 

Thank you for your email regarding the above Parking Charge Notice (PCN).

 

What you need to do now

 

So I can contact the driver for payment of the amount due, please let me know their name and address. Please let me have these details by 13/07/2016.

 

What if you do not know who the driver of the vehicle was

 

As you are the registered keeper of the vehicle, I am assuming that it was being driven with your consent and that you will therefore know who the driver was.

 

If you do not provide details of the driver by the date shown above, we will continue to contact you for payment of the parking charge on the assumption that as the registered keeper you were also the driver of the vehicle (as established in Elliott v Loake [1982]).

 

Payment of the £145.00 outstanding can be made online or by phone.

 

What will happen if you do not name the driver of the vehicle or make payment

 

If you do not name the driver or the amount outstanding is not paid by the date shown above, it will be recommended to our client that court action be taken by them to recover the amount outstanding.

 

More information

 

 

 

Can some advise if i still have to pay them???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you in Scotland?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You totally ignore in Scotland

Go read the (this) thread you have jumped on

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could complain about the improper accessing of your keeper details as the POFA isnt applicable in Scotland but the DVLA will just ignore you. However they will have to log the complaint and in a years time publish the data to show how many people made a complaint and what they are going to do about it all.

 

As for DR+. ignore anything they say or do, they dont have any interest or rights in this matter. Mind you, that is why PE have farmed out this duff claim to them, they know it is dead and just hope the letterhead of debt collector makes you think they are some kind of High Court Enforcement Officer

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 8 months later...

Parking eye have never came back, so we won this case through help and advice on CAG, anyone dealing with any of these parking charge firms there is advice on this thread to read, this took place in Scotland where the law is different, so if anywhere else adjust to the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...