Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hit a barrier


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter was going over a toll bridge and the barrier was down, she paid the fee to cross the bridge.

 

The sun was directly upon the windscreen and she got distracted and tried to drive off hitting the barrier and knocking it off.

 

The company that owns the toll booth sent my daughter a letter stating they want to claim of her insurance.

 

My daughters insurance as cost nearly 2000 pounds which she paysmonthly by direct debit as she is 19 and not been driving for a full year yet.

 

I genuinely fear for her as she is pregnant and this claim would send her insurance astronomical upon renewal.

 

Can we offer to pay the damage outside of the insurance? How do we go about that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to write to the company and suggested and that you may want to deal with it directly.

 

The company may be reluctant to do this because they might sense that there will be complications.

 

I suggest that you couch your letter in a way which suggests that if you settle directly then they will be less delay and it will be more straightforward all round.

 

You need to ask them that an assessment of the value of the damage. However, you will probably be in for a surprise that it is going to cost much more than you think.

 

You might find that when you have all the figures in front of you, that the insurance is the only way to go

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter was going over a toll bridge and the barrier was down, she paid the fee to cross the bridge.

 

The sun was directly upon the windscreen and she got distracted and tried to drive off hitting the barrier and knocking it off.

 

The company that owns the toll booth sent my daughter a letter stating they want to claim of her insurance.

 

My daughters insurance as cost nearly 2000 pounds which she paysmonthly by direct debit as she is 19 and not been driving for a full year yet.

 

I genuinely fear for her as she is pregnant and this claim would send her insurance astronomical upon renewal.

 

Can we offer to pay the damage outside of the insurance? How do we go about that?

 

Bear in mind that she will still be obliged to inform the insurance company of an accident causing damage if asked, and it would be asked for at renewal.

 

Thus she could expect an increase in premium as she will be viewed as being "a higher risk" than if she hadn't had an accident.

Failure to declare an accident could lead to her insurance being voided if the non-declaration was discovered. This, then, would make her even worse off as she'd not only risk having any claim rejected but also have to declare having insurance cancelled on any later applications, too.

 

So, she should inform her insurers.

 

It will then become "which is more costly, settle it myself having declared it" and "let the insurers sort it out", for which you'll need to know how much the claim will likely be for, as Conniff has noted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she had paid the toll why was the barrier down? Had she moved off too quickly or was there another reason? I am asking to see if there was any contributory factor that was under the control of the bridge company or even a malfunction of their equipment which would mean that they played a part in the damage being caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she had paid the toll why was the barrier down? Had she moved off too quickly or was there another reason? I am asking to see if there was any contributory factor that was under the control of the bridge company or even a malfunction of their equipment which would mean that they played a part in the damage being caused.

 

 

That's the first thing that jumped into my mind EB.

I regularly use the M6 toll road and as soon as the payment clears the barrier opens. In fact it opens before you get your card back. I'd be asking for the CCTV footage as they are all recorded.

 

 

Personally I'd be asking to see the evidence that she did do something wrong. I wouldn't be rolling over straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks from what I can gather she paid the toll then the guy who took her money was talking and after about half a minute she assumed he'd raised the barrier but obviously not and she hit it, she couldn't see it due to dun dazzling the windscreen.

 

what's more worrying is she as an excess on the policy of 750 which she has no means to pay as she only works part time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half a minute is 30 seconds which is a long time waiting for the barrier to move up. Does your daughter remember seeing a green light?

Plus I have a feeling some of these barriers have proximity sensors for Toll Tags. I don't get this and am beginning to think the employee might be equally to blame here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half a minute is 30 seconds which is a long time waiting for the barrier to move up. Does your daughter remember seeing a green light?

Plus I have a feeling some of these barriers have proximity sensors for Toll Tags. I don't get this and am beginning to think the employee might be equally to blame here.

 

The employee is equally to blame? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the first thing that jumped into my mind EB.

I regularly use the M6 toll road and as soon as the payment clears the barrier opens. In fact it opens before you get your card back. I'd be asking for the CCTV footage as they are all recorded.

 

 

Personally I'd be asking to see the evidence that she did do something wrong. I wouldn't be rolling over straight away.

 

Unless the barrier went up, and back down as she was moving forward, it would be seen as her fault.

 

It's like rear ending a car and blaming it for being in front of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I don't see how she could blame the company or the employee. Ultimately she drove into a stationary object.

 

Normally I would say keep everything in writing. But in this case is it worth giving them a call? This won't be the first time someone has driven into a barrier so you might be able to get an informal estimate of how much it usually costs. The person dealing with it should be able to tell you fairly quickly whether you are looking at a few hundred or a few thousand, and whether there is any scope for dealing with it outside the insurance.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there was no light system on this barrier it's a on a hill on a country road and there is a little booth in the middle of the road which there is either one or 2 man in it taking money off motorists from either side of the road.

 

The irony in all of this is that it costs just 12p to go through the barrier.

 

However I think I would agree with the general consensus on here in that I'm afraid she will have to bite the bullet on this one and put it down to experience and learn from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...