Jump to content

heliosuk

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    2,540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

heliosuk last won the day on May 30 2013

heliosuk had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

100 Excellent

About heliosuk

  • Rank
    Classic Account Holder
  1. You're quite right Bankfodder. It would be a great help if we knew what vehicle it was, how old and how many miles. None of this is stated. If the car is relatively new and a diesel especially within the new EU6 emissions regulations you will get funny smells from the usual. Totally miffed with the diagnosis. I reckon on the balance of probability the car might actually be performing as it should.
  2. Actually if you have charged the battery overnight and it only reads 12.55 after charging then the battery is faulty. The minimum it should read after charging ( and a surface charge reading, which you do by turning on headlights on full beam for 3 seconds usually) is 13.6 Volts. On balance I think the battery is faulty. The starter motor relies on volts plus amps with the driving force being the volts so if the volts are low and you have a set resistance in the starter you'll get a higher amp which will blow the fuse. I was caught out on a Saxo by this 10 years ago.
  3. Perhaps the laughter could backfire on you DX. It depends on the definition of ECU and since the early 2000's most cars have wipers controlled by an ECU. ECU is an electronic control unit. If the OP could indicate what age and what the car is it might be possible to identify what is going on. From that it should be possible to determine if the fault lies in the BCM ( which is also an ECU) the CJB ( not an ECU) or something more basic, such as a CAN or LAN line or even with a LIN line fault which is usually linked to a connector fault. If you think an ECU is an engine control unit then you're about 15 years out of date as this is now a PCM. If the OP could state what age and car it is, it would be possible to guide the OP to the correct way to sort the problem and then it would be possible to determine what sort of recompense may or not be available to pursue. Wherever possible OP's should also include DTC's recorded as this can guide the correct sort of advice.
  4. Quite right ericsbrother. As usual the site team steam in. It could be a Range Rover Evoque, Sport or Range Rover. Doubt it would be a Velar at this price. OP needs to state exactly which Range Rover it is, age and mileage and service history. I know the Evoque has had problem with the Haldex. If the car has a full service history they might get some recourse through the dealer network if approached in the correct way. The rear drive unit also suffers from contamination with left over machinings and water ingress. An independant dealer won't know this unless they subscribe to the Land Rover Technical Bulletin scheme. I would suggest the best course of action is for the OP to state exactly what the car is and for the site team to ask the same said questions before steaming in with the tiresome legal advice where proper experts can give an opinion as to the fault and let the OP get his car fixed. This approach has been very successful in the past especially with VW 3 cylinder heads. It totally negates having to go through the courts. People need to bear in mind that a car is bought for a reason and even new ones go wrong but to steam in with what some site members post will just get the vendors back up which is not helpful to the OP in sorting out the issue though is correct in legal rights but not law. No doubt this post will be censured or deleted as usual.
  5. You need to be clear here, Jaguar don't own the dealership. It seems the dispute is with the dealership, which the contract is with. I'd be interested about the discount though as something makes me think there is something wrong here. Reading all the posts suggests it's not Jaguar whose at fault but the dealership which is where the complaint should lye. Jaguar seems to be supporting the dealer by saying they've done the right things but have not offered a solution as of yet???
  6. I really don't know, some of these systems are brilliant such as lane departure, parking aid sensors but AEB I just don't get like I don't get auto dip. Frequently calibrated incorrectly and for the wrong markets. It's not enhancing the driving experience but taking control of human intervention. Good technology introductions such as Sat Nav, ABS, EBS Adaptive dampers, SOS are all good features along with many others but those which take away driver interaction cannot be good for anyone.
  7. Actually it is as neither you or the garage have a legally binding contract otherwise which is why it's a 50/50 settlement. "When choosing a garage, if you have an option, go on recommendation or use a garage that is a member of a trade association - this garage was not recommended or a member of a trade association so that left me high and dry". Either way, it wouldn't have resulted in any other outcome. Get a job card signed and it's then clear cut!!
  8. no the sensors aren't adjustable, they're calibrated during original manufacture. It's a radar based system. dirt on the sensors can cause a problem. I think JLR cars follow the same procedure as its German rivals for a service calibration but it's not an easy process. Personally when I'm using cars equipped with this I turn it off as 1. I think the technology is not mature enough and 2. I'd rather rely on my driving ability plus 3 if you're in a situation to use it you've probably done something to get you in that situation!
  9. Not necessarily. I did point out this was a 50/50 case but you've done the right thing. Possibly a lesson learnt here for everyone in that when you take your car to a garage ensure you sign a job card as to what you want and what is required. It's a legal requirement! It also puts an end to any dispute as the instructions are clear cut!
  10. Probably hasn't read the owners manual or understands the how the system works. These systems need to be kept clean all the times so if the OP hasn't washed the car it will flag up errors. Then the car goes into a dealer who does a courtesy wash and all is then well so the dealer can't find out what's wrong. Seen this so many times on BMW and Mercs!!!
  11. True bankfodder but if he sold 1 ice cream van a month then then he would be classed as a trader in ice cream vans wouldn't he.
  12. Well here's a start. https://www.autotrader.co.uk/sell-my-car/frequently-asked-questions/trade-seller And here's another perhaps a bit more informative. https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=1085769 Whilst neither is official it does suggest that over 6 cars in a year and the sellar would be considered a trader. And here as well: http://www.tradingstandardswales.org.uk/prosecutions/2015JanMerthyr.cfm Now this article is interesting as it implies a sale of approximately once a month is considered a trader as I originally pointed out and is a report on an official trading standards case.
  13. I think from a legal point of view is that if the same said person can be proved to have sold more than 6 vehicles over 6 months then they are deemed to be a trader. I can't remember the exact numbers that trigger it.
  14. That's a very sensible and accurate answer to my point. For example, If a major retailer sold for example a TV, would you expect a replacement TV whilst it's repaired? Under warranty terms and conditions there is a right to repair but no entitlement to temporary replacement goods.
  15. Perhaps based on this the ill informed Bankfodder might like to reconsider his ill informed decision to censure me for this post and consider his contributions to this part of the forum as obviously is extremely weak in this area. Automotive is a very subjective area of the law which I unfortunately have to deal with and intervene world wide on a regular basis at the highest levels. Higher even than basic consumer law come to that but I doubt he will. In fact, whilst my posts are factual, his are not and are frankly libellous.
×
×
  • Create New...