Jump to content

lamboboy

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    82
  • Avg. Content Per Day

    0.7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About lamboboy

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Gotcha! Just for the record; It's all amicable between everyone so I'll let her know. Thank you
  2. It's our problem if we have to shoulder the entire debt isn't it?
  3. There's an ADD button?! Ok, we'll do that and return our dq and wait for mediation. Thank you
  4. Yes. Originally they both got individual paperwork but with the same claim number. Cag advised to acknowledge both and defend both which we did. Now SW have picked up the baton; they are now apparently only pursuing my partner!
  5. Hi Yes! She initially had identical paperwork in her own name! Our history shows the claim, acknowledgement, defence and now dq. Hers shows the same but no dq
  6. But how can they drop a defendant in the process?! As Bekki said.... the details need to be correct surely!? It's frustrating it got this far in the first place without now assuming all responsibility. I will just have to bring it up if and when it goes to mediation and/or court.
  7. I'm too confused now! Shulmans issued this claim in the first instance and after we filed our defence, Shulmans notified of a change to the claim to indicate Southern Water were stepping back in. We then got a letter from Southern Water reducing the liability to remove what was SB to which CAG advice was to ignore it as the claim appeared to be stayed. Now we have this DQ under the original claim number which is now pursuing just my partner an '1 other'. To summarise: was Shulmans; 2 defendants; now Southern Water, 1 named defendant!; and us completely lost!
  8. Thanks everyone. So... should we leave this and use it in a defence or should we do something now? This is not Shulmans error but Southern Water. Shulmans have been relieved at this point, hence the new claim. Can I ask what your defence has been please Bekki? We sound like we're in the same boat!
  9. Sorry Andyorch but we have only received what I've put up on this thread. Is any of that the DQ Please?
  10. If you don't have the v5 they charge you though
  11. Hi Andy Is this ok to send the Solicitor please? Thank you for your reassurances. I can announce my intention to withdraw the claim subject to reassurances that the production of the legal documentation, in form of a V5 will be available upon collection of the vehicle. This is in light of the correspondence I hold from the DVLA which states that legal ownership had reverted back to your client.
×
×
  • Create New...