Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/weightmans - claimform - Moneyway loan , i know nothing about


lovetobake
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You sure that's the Notice of Allocation....should look like the following....

 

N159

 

 

http://wbus.westlaw.co.uk/forms/pdf/cpf00139.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the court (your local court) ..inform them you have not received the N159 (Notice of Allocation)...ask has it been served?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

andy, I phoned the court and that was received and served.

 

Now, the latest.........

 

I think I have been stiffed!!!!

I have today received a letter from the court.

 

 

If I understand it correctly, the judge has gone in their favour without me having the opportunity to produce the evidence I have and have my say.

 

The letter says:

 

"IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

An order to be hereby granted in the terms of the said Annexed Minutes and that do stand as an order of this court"

 

The annexed minutes it refers to is I presume the copy of the claimants defence, a copy of which was enclosed.

 

I would appreciate it Andy, or anyone else who understands exactly what this means and what I can do about it.

 

 

Can I appeal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without sight of the Order (verbatim) and the Annexed Minutes ...its very difficult to advise lovetobake...if you cant scan them in you will have to type them out (verbatim)

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its only a response to your defence.....as you have blanked all the dates payments made its hard to determine if its statute barred...only you will know if what they state is fact.

The claim is proceeding.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you state you have received the N159 (Notice of Allocation) that states what will happen from here on...directions ...dates ...etc,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have now received directions and the judge has ordered that it will be a paperwork only hearing. I have to reply to accept a paper only hearing which I assume will be ok? If I want a proper hearing I have to write back and request one. I have to get my statement in within the next couple of weeks and any evidence.

 

Can I write my statement exactly how it is or do I have to word it in a legal way? if so, would there be a template on here that would give me some indication as I really dont have a clue!

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paper hearing with regards to what......? The trial date or a CMC (case management conference) ?

 

I personally would want to be in person at any hearing that affects my case.......written evidence hearings do not outline the full matters of a defence.

 

There are no templates LTB for a statement a statement is your personal version of events and evidence that you will rely on in your own words...not something that can be a template.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you genuinely had no knowledge of any claim/agreement that could relate to this debt I don't think SB was the way to go. If you are aware of any financial commitmant around that time which could relate to this debt, albeit under a different name from moneyway, I'd be careful you don't dig a big hole yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy it says: "The judge proposes to deal with the claim without a hearing, that is, on papers alone but can only do this if all parties agree"

 

It then goes on to say that I should tell the court whether or not I agree to this by completing the bottom half of the form and send acopy to the claimant. I have already received a copy from weightmans saying they agree to it. I guess it suits them down to the ground so they dont have to attend.

 

What is your thoughts on this Andy, do you think I should say no and request a hearing? I have to do a statement with any evidence as you would a hearing so all I would say is the reasons why I think it is SB and also point out that cabot have failed to produce any paperwork and they letter they sent me says that they cannot obtain a judgement against me.

 

I dont have long to decide which way to go so I need to know the pros and cons so to speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Panther, I hear what you say but it has already been done now.

the reason I put in a SB defence is because I have been married for 20 years

and the claim was issued in my maiden name.

 

 

So, if such a debt did exist, which I seriously think it does unless someone has used my identity,

then it would be SB and they are chancing their luck.

 

I have a letter received recently from Cabot stating that they cannot get a CCA

(to prove that I did actually take out a loan with moneyway)

so they cannot obtain a judgement against me and it is not enforcable

so why the hell are their henchmen going full steam ahead to court.

As I see it, its them who are digging themselves a hole.

 

I think I will ask for a proper hearing and I can explain everything to the judge in person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I think I will ask for a proper hearing and I can explain everything to the judge in person".

 

Probabaly wise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you andy, that is what I am going to do.

 

I have to write to the court and request an Oral hearing,

which I need to do pretty much straight away as there is a very short time scale to do this.

 

Who would I address the letter to

and would I just say following receipt of the Notice of Allocation I request an oral hearing?

 

Do I need to put anything else?

 

Sorry, I seem a little thick but I dont really have much idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the notice provided.....

 

" It then goes on to say that I should tell the court whether or not I agree to this by completing the bottom half of the form and send a copy to the claimant."

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

So how did this end?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you are now back online with us with another claim

how about updating this one?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good correct thank you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...