Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/restons Claimform - old Halifax Credit Card 'debt'


joel.hall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3426 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently in the middle of replying online

(they have tried various tricks in the past to get my signature,

so I shall not be replying in writing nor sending anything to their solicitors

but using money claim online),

 

 

explaining my intention to defend under the Limitations Act

and due to the lack of a CCA,

as well as not acknowledging the debt or making any form of payment on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Please follow the info given by dx. It is important.

 

The SB defence has to be written in a proper way.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

drop all comms

 

 

get that link done please

 

 

BEFORE you do MCOL or anything more.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell us your previous username please

Link to post
Share on other sites

3. An payment plan offer I made years ago of £10 per month was rejected.

How long ago did you make the offer.

 

 

If it is truley SB'd that in itself is an absolute defence.

If so, what I would do (to bring early closure) is acknowledge the claim

and send a letter to cabot informing them that you have completed the AoS

and will be your intention to defend the claim on the basis that it is clearly statute barred.

 

 

Invite them to withdraw the claim and

that if you don't receive notice of discontinuence within 7 days

your defence will be submitted to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant:

Cabot Financial (UK) Limited

 

Date of issue: 17th December 2014

Time to acknowledge: 5th January 2015

Time to defend: 19th January 2014

What is the claim for?:

The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance

due from the Defendant(s)under a contract between the Defendant(s)

and Halifax dated on or about Dec 05 2005

and assigned to the Claimant on Nov 28 2008 in the sum of 2226

 

PARTICULARS

 

DATE: 28/11/2014

ITEM: Default Balance

VALUE 2226

Post Refrl Cr: NIL

TOTAL: 2226

What is the value of the claim? TOTAL AMOUNT: 2411

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before. 5th December 2005

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. The debt purchaser, Cabot Ltd.

Were you aware the account had been assigned

– did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No. I was only aware after receiving demands from Cabot Ltd.

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No.

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year? No, not for any years.

Why did you cease payments?

I lost employment through ill-health, could not afford them,

Halifax refused to stop charges and interest,

and payment insurance refused my claim.

 

What was the date of your last payment? Sometime in 2007.

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, regarding the total amount owed, which I had never borrowed.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?

Yes, via telephone, which was declined.

However I refused to discuss my personal income/outgoings,

and only offered what I could afford at the time.

 

re the CCA: I have done so, Halifax informed me it did not have a signed CCA, and returned my request and fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

old thread merged.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you go get your credit file please

and check if this debt shows please

need to confirm you last payment date if poss

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpr and CCA?

 

 

go get noddle report see below

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are all you old addresses showing?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I already made a CCA request a few years ago, they claimed to not have one and returned my request and the postal order for the fee.

 

 

you MUST send a new CCA request to the claimant

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I've only have two addresses ever and both are showing (I only spent 11 months at the other address, never informed any banks of this or signed to the electoral register there), as well as my fiancee on my account as a linked person. Halifax is linked to my file it says, and my bank (Lloyds) made two checks on me this year which are showing. There are no records of any loans, credit cards, or anything else, and my "score" is 4/5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like it SB'd then

 

 

cra confirms it

 

 

and no payment to the claimant since assignment confirms it too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope they have no need to respond and often now don't

but the CCA request they MUST comply with

 

 

get it sent NOW

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update:

Received a letter from the solicitor representing Cabot today (14/01/2015), dated 5th January 2015, envelope stamped 6th January by the Post Office/Royal Mail. Somehow it only arrived this morning. This is in reply to my CPR31.14 request letter of 19th December 2014.

 

Dear sir,

 

Cabot Financial (UK) Limited v. Mr Joel Hall

 

Please find enclosed a draft letter which purports to come from you but which is unsigned.

 

You will appreciate that we must ensure we are corresponding with the correct person and that anyone requesting information is entitled to receive it.

 

Please ensure that all documentation is signed failing which we will not acknowledge receipt nor provide any response.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Mr S Bray, Litigation Executive

pp Resonts Solicitors Limitied

 

Sneaky attempt to obtain my signature? After all, they shouldn't have anything to compare it to. At any rate, they have not asked for an extension within 14 days of my request and offered a new date for which to fulfil my request.

 

Opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual rubbish from rectums designed to intimidate and unsettle a defendant.

 

 

if you wish you can sign it

 

 

but the CCA is the important one

and they MUST reply

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Needless to say, I will not be providing anything with my signature on. I know, as do they, they haven't got the documents. They are after my signature to forge them. Happened a while back, as I posted on here. I forged Adolf Hitler's signature onto a letter - I then received a copy of a credit card application form (with the terms and conditions on the back dated 2 years after I took out the card) and was told by the bank "that's the CCA". It had Hitler's signature on it...

Anyway, I went to the MoJ website and viewed the Civil Rules and Practice Directions, Part 31: nothing at all about needing a signature, and besides a signature made, which is not witnessed, is not proof of identity, and is meaningless in this case. I have until this Friday to submit my defence.

 

Anyway, haven't heard a peep regarding the CCA request. The first sent off years ago was returned along with the postal order, with an admission they had no signed CCA. This one appears to simply be ignored. At any rate, according to the information they put in the claim, it was over six years with no movement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...