Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dwp debt from 1991


mascotty02
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

(( this was from a different thread))

Hi,

I have the same issue here,

 

 

but I know that I owed this to them that was back in 1991,

 

 

I went for an interview with them and at that time I was back in full time work,

 

 

I took my cheque book and after I was interviewed offered to pay the full amount back there and then, £369.00,

 

 

I offered to pay this there and then on the spot,

the guy who interviewed me advised me 'we will forego this and will write this off'

 

 

they have contacted me 3 times since then and

 

 

I have phoned them and they still will not listen to me,

 

 

I am disputing this and even if it is against the DWP/Government can they still take this from my employer whilst this is in dispute?

 

 

I cannot afford any more deductions from my wages as I am on minimum wage at the moment

due to the last 5 years undergoing treatment for cancer, and I am still trying to catch up with all my other creditors.

 

 

Is there anything I can do,

 

 

any help,

 

 

advice would be greatly appreciated and thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My pleasure- write to them explainimg that you are currently struggling. They will take it out of any future benefits so best to pay it off whilst you can have some say over how much the instalments are.

 

I truly hope things improve for you x

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Again thanks, just to let you know I have never taken out any benefits whilst the treatment was ongoing, I went straight for SSP and only had two weeks off when I had the operation and then 6 weeks later when I had the chemo took a total of two weeks from that again on SSP.. I did ask for disability badge for the car when I was recovering and they turned me down for this, I plodded on, have sent a letter today.

Kind regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hey guys,

Thanks for your response and advice, unfortunately despite my request to suspend the recovery and to request my appeal, they have gone and taken the amount from my wages over 3 months, I would like to take this further, just because they are government controlled does not give them the right to go ahead and take it, my wages after the deduction was less than £900.00 for the month, this has left me in debt with the bank and council tax, I had previously contacted the agent at the council tax office, advised of the situation prior to DWP taking money from my work and they put this on the back burner for 2 months, so start payments again in February.. is there anyone on here who can help me take matters further, with a solicitor as when I did go in for the interview and advised that I would pay there and then with a cheque he went off for about 15/20 minutes and came back and advised this would not be necessary and would be written off. I am taking this further if anyone can help, I would appreciate this.

Kind regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

when I offered to pay there and then with my cheque book, he went off for about 30 minutes or so, finally came back ((felt like 3 days)) and advised that as I had offered there and then he stated this has been written off on this occasion, on the condition I do not claim for any benefits unless unemployed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think an officer can decide to write off a debt on the spot. It's a decision taken higher up. Did you get a letter after your interview confirming no action?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoe,

sadly, no I didn't get a letter of confirmation of this, I should have requested one, but I was young and naive in those days and wish I had done now and asked for it, had I had one or asked for one , this would never have come up, but I am adamant that he did state after going off for 30 odd minutes or so he had spoken to the hierarchy and this was the outcome, sadly I have no proof, is there still something I can do regarding this dispute??

Again I appreciate you comments and advice and thank you.

Kind regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's likely that he was referring to not taking any action on that occasion, I was a fraud investigator back then (I'm that old!!) and ovwrpayments were not written off routinely. They would have needed to get the overpayment properly calculated before they could take the money. I guess as it was so long ago it's hard to say.

In honesty, if you don't dispute the overpayment ocurred I don't think there is much you can do to stop recovery. Though I think you have plenty of room to complain about the draconian manner of recovery- to take all that at once is harsh at best.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

is there anyone who will take my case up regarding payments and dispute against the DWP, many years ago I claimed benefits when my wife was working and turned out that I should not have been claiming and they called me in to advise me of this, at that stage of the interview I offered to pay the full amount back in full in a form of a cheque, they disappeared for approx 30 minutes and came back after a meeting with the hierarchy and advised that I had offered to pay this back on this occasion they would write this off, I wished I had asked for this in writing, but being young and naive didnt even think to ask for this and now 20 years later they have requested this back, I have disputed this with them however they have decided over the Christmas period and new year, taken it from my wages, even though I have written to advise that this is being disputed, they have ignore this and taken this from my wages, I wish to take them to court not for the money, but for the principal of this, no other company will do this if there is a dispute going on so why should the DWP get away with it, please can someone help me please.

Thanks

Kind regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without the overpayment being written off in writing, there is not much you can do.

 

You cannot prove the overpayment was written off.

 

Therefore DWP can use any legitamte means to recover the overpayment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoe,

Again, thank you I will have to let this go as no proof of what was said, I still have one more payment coming out of my wages this month (Feb) again leaving me with no money, and cancelling my DD for the council tax, they are fully aware of the situation and they have accepted this under the circumstances but I am going to complain, if there is an ombudsmen for the council I will write to them. or someone hierarchy.

Appreciate your comments and once again thank you.

kind regards

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

It was the DWP I have written to them on several occasions disputing this but then out of the blue in November they sent me a letter advising that they had approached my work place and taking the money direct from work.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There appears to be 2 threads on the same subject by Mascotty02. Not quite sure which one to add my two penn'orth to.

 

Here are a few links to sites that explain DWP debt recovery policy in detail:

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/196337/response/484852/attach/4/ORG.pdf

 

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/138603/response/337178/attach/3/Overpayment%20Recovery%20Guide%20v47a.pdf

 

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/benefits_w/benefits_benefits_introduction_ew/benefits_problems_with_benefits_and_tax_credits_e/benefit_overpayments.htm

 

 

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/benefits_w/benefits_benefits_introduction_ew/benefits_problems_with_benefits_and_tax_credits_e/benefits_challenging_a_benefit_decision/benefits_challenging_a_dwp_benefit_decision_on_or_after_28_october_2013/challenging_a_dwp_benefit_decision_on_or_after_28_october_2013.htm

 

 

 

You will know best yourself the details of your case.

 

One fact that appears to differ in the regulations from your recollection of events of 24 years ago is where you say that you were advised that " I had offered to pay this back on this occasion they would write this off". Anyone giving you this advice, or acting on it, would be acting outside the law, as the regulations clearly states that they could not do this.

 

Whatever justification you may have for taking the DWP to court for recovery of the money that is now being deducted from your wages, or the way it has been done, taking them to court over a matter of principle is a non-starter.

 

Even if we were to accept that DWP had principles, which is disputable, their principles will differ from your own and who is to decide which to uphold in a case such as this, bearing in mind that the court has to be objective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible that there were crossed wires. The officer would not be able to accept a cheque there & then as the overpayment needs to be properly calculated & invoiced before the officer could take the money. Perhaps the forgo on this occasion meant he couldn't take the money there are then.

If you were iuc'd the overpayment would not be written off.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...