Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP Didn't Turn Up


imacsu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I went to court to defend against MKDP for a disputed debt relating to a HSBC credit card that has no CCA for it.

 

 

They had paid £85 costs + £335 further costs to secure the court date.

 

Upon attending court, I was called in 20 minutes or so after the scheduled time.

 

 

The judge immediately began proceedings by making reference to the actual letter sent out to confirm the court date.

 

 

He asked if I had, since this the date of this letter, received any witness statements or other correspondence from MKDP, to which I replied no.

 

The judge then proceeded to confirm that the court had also not received any withness statements or other correspondence from MKDP

, and as MKDP had not arrived, he was obliged to me offer me two options,

either the case could be adjourned, or it could be struck out.

 

He then proceeded to explain the process of getting the case re-instated etc

(they could claim they were stuck on the M6 for example),

and advised me of a few other things, and said I could leave.

 

Where do I stand with this now?

 

 

I have never formally submitted a request for a CCA previously,

but I did make a request from the HSBC in a branch

(I was informed by their support it was the only way to make such a request at the time) and

they couldn't obtain it from the computer,

 

 

sent to the branch where I was registered at the time,

and they couldn't obtain it from there,

they then sent to London to see if it was in the archives and it wasn't there either.

 

Should I be sending a request for CCA quick-sharp?

 

 

To both MKDP and HSBC?

 

 

My defence was based around the argument of unenforceable,

so far MKDP have not sent me an ounce of evidence to prove they actually own the debt,

or that they have any CCA.

 

 

In addition, they actually have the date of default incorrect on my credit file

(HSBC date of default is some 6 months earlier, which was actually the true date of default).

 

Why would they pay all that money and not turn up/send statements?

 

 

Are they playing for time, or calling my bluff?

 

 

What is the likelyhood of a court re-instating the claim?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes CCA off ASAP.

 

 

the reason why they do this is because they how for an easy non contested default judgement

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I assume he struck it out ? Being stuck on the M6 is one thing not complying with any directions 7 days previous is another.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

So now MKDP have given up and sold the debt on to "Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Limited".

 

 

They have passed it on to "Robinson Way Debt Collectors" for collection who have also sent me a letter stating...

 

"We are aware that legal activity has already been taken in respect of this account.

Our client's solicitors, Howard Cohen & Co, will be applying to the court to change the name of the claimant to Hoist Portfolio

Holding 2 Limited and they will write to you to confirm this once the process is completed.

 

 

In the meantime, please contact us if you have any queries

 

 

They are offering payment plans of 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, or whatever I can afford.

 

 

Now I recall Midland Debt Recovery (part of the HSBC Group!) trying to collect this debt many years ago before it was offloaded by HSBC.

They we're offering me a payment plan of 17 years - should I assume from this that they hold little hope of actually getting the money back,

and want to get something for me (and MKDP have cut their losses, after trying the CCJ route, much like HSBC couldn't even be bothered to go to court).

 

From what I recall, the last time I made a payment on this account, was May 2010

- so I'm assuming they only have until May 2016 before the debt is statute barred anyway.

 

Are Robinson Way/HPH2L the last throw of the dice, buying unenforceable debt portfolios for buttons

in the hope of getting something rather than nothing, or are they the real deal and likely to hound me

and take it back to court (can it even be taken back to court now, given that it was truck out 14 months ago!!).

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

std letter everyone is getting

 

 

MKDP/MKRR are part of the cappello group

 

 

the cappello group was purchased by hoist group [HPH2 ltd] a few months ago.

 

 

and robbersway are hoist.

 

 

safe to ignore

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...