Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya all,

 

My wife has a debt with the Sheriffs Office in which we are currently liaising with them - total debt is £6200

 

She suffers from severe anxiety following a violent attack for which she is receiving currently police referred counselling and we have a police reference for.

 

We have provided details of both of these to the Sheriffs Office but have just got an email back to say that despite this we cannot have the 28 days we have asked for to pay this in full and that enforcement will commence immediately

 

Is there anything we can do? If people turn up it is going to lead to her to have anxiety attacks and miss work

 

I was under the impression- probably wrongly- that the new guidelines indicated that vulnerable people would be dealt with in other ways

 

Is there a template letter we can send them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think that you need to contact the people the money is owed to, as they will be responsible for the action of the Sheriffs office.

 

There is no template letter on this site.

 

If the Police are helping with the situation with you wife, perhaps they can assist. A complaint for harassment against the Sheriffs Office who are ignoring your wifes vulnerability. The Police officer your wife has dealt with may be willing to contact the Sheriffs Office to warn them off and to suggest that they think again.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

 

I will draft something up to the creditor tonight then and get that off first thing.

 

we did CC them into the original 28 day request though so assuming they were part of the rejection process

 

Just a horrible situation as worried it will make her ill as a result of it

 

we will also contact the sheriffs office again in relation to this and site it again to see if we can get it held

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would something along these lines be okay do you think?

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I am writing to you regarding the above reference for which I have an account with you

I have asked via email for an extension to any of enforcement action of 28 days which has been rejected today.

 

I am asking for you to look again at this decision due to my vulnerable status. I suffered an severe violent attack which has left me very anxious and prone to panic attacks. I informed the creditors of this prior to any action being taken along with details from both the police and counselling service who are assisting me.

 

I am prepared to supply you the details of both the officer in charge of the investigation and my councillors who would be able to support the viewpoint of me being extremely vulnerable.

 

I am not trying to avoid paying the order against me but a visit from an enforcement office r- or indeed the threat of one turning up- will lead to me having severe attacks and to suffer severe mental distress. On the one occasion an officer has attended prior to my offer above I suffered anxiety and depression to such an extent that I lost 5 days of work due to it.

 

I hope that you will take the decision to award me a postponement of any action so that I can pay the amount in full within 28 days. I have additionally CC’d the creditors into this email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can you list the details of the debt please so we have a better understanding of what is actually going on at the enforcement angle of things. This will allow better advice to be given to you in the long run

 

 

Thx

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies

 

It is a CCJ which she got 12 motnhs ago at roughly the same time of the attack to her. She is still receiving counselling for this on a very regular basis. - the severity of the attack is quite high and was of a sexual nature

 

She has only in the last two months returned to work so my major worry is that she will now start having panic attacks again- as she had one previously due to someone turning up

 

No reason was given just that no time extensions will be given and enforcement will commence immediately

 

Naively on my part I thought because the creditor was aware in advance of the severity of the attack/ vulnerability that this was not a course of action that could happen but I was obviously wrong on that

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chances are the Creditor is only interested in their money. Does your wife agree she owes the money? Did she defend the original CCJ at all? You say she is willing to pay in full - if so do you have a specific date in mind? Is the £6200 you refer to initially include the Enforcement Fees?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read your post as I am going through a similar process. Your wife is very brave to be going back to work and continuing her life, I havent reached that stage yet but I do know how anything can trigger panic attacks and a big relapse which is the last thing you want. Has your wife got a mental nurse/ cpn helping? I think the police would help as it is intimidation and she is very vulnerable, as they are still in contact with you. have you asked them to step in? sorry i am of no help to your problem but my heart goes out to you both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chances are the Creditor is only interested in their money. Does your wife agree she owes the money? Did she defend the original CCJ at all? You say she is willing to pay in full - if so do you have a specific date in mind? Is the £6200 you refer to initially include the Enforcement Fees?

 

Hiya,

 

Yes I think thats very much the case,

 

She did not argue it at the time but she was going through everything, so she should have

 

Yes it includes fees and we can get it sorted in full within 14 days but asked initially for 28 days to play it safe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, you probably don't want to hear this but I must say it as I see it. In my view you may not be classed as potentially vulnerable but can possibly help yourselves turn this around by your wife seeking medical help because of the onset of the panic attack following the initial visit, this way you can then provide some medical proof to back everything up and vulnerability could then be an issue.

 

Of course in the meantime if the Enforcement Agent calls then as long as you deny him entry to your home or otherwise prevent him Taking Control of goods outside - a car possibly - then there is not much that can be done. You could try talking to the attending Agent and see if you can reach an agreement with him to pay either in full or in part by a certain date.

 

There is another alternative and that would be to apply for a Stay of Execution against the Writ, this could be done on an urgent basis and if granted would halt all further enforcement action & charges. The cost of this application is now £155 and if interested can furnish further details. Sometimes a Stay is requested in conjunction with a Variation application but if you are considering paying in full then this may not be necessary. Of course if you are positive you can pay within a very short time then stalling for time may be your best bet.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news for you! Goes to show when you talk to creditors/Enforcement Agents things can happen, there is zero point in hoping creditors know what your situation actually is unless you tell them !!

 

 

So telling them what is the case can sometimes help, now don't miss a payment or more fees will/may be added

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted on another thread this morning that many companies are 'rewinding' cases back to the Compliance stage' when EVIDENCE is provided of 'vulnerability' and it is pleasing to see that The Sheriffs Office are seen to be doing the same.

 

It must be remembered that the 'writ' that the enforcement agent is enforcing is a COMMAND (much like an order). The importance of 'engaging' with the enforcement company at the 'Compliance' stage cannot be understated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...