Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Merligen Investments Claimform on shopacheck 'debt' - help*** Settled***


bart70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had a small debt with a door step shark(Morses) which after the agent stopped collecting ended up going to a DCA.

 

This morning a letter from Moriarty Law came informing they intend to take court action...

 

After I stopped laughing I did a little digging and have found the following...

The address of this law firm 15 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EF is a virtual office..

 

. Bit more digging revels that the name of the firms director is also the same as Merligen Investments Ltd.

 

So in other words it's not a real law firm but a in house dept using a Virtual office to look like a real law firm......

 

Now I seen a some bits about this in the papers of late the biggest been Wonga who had to pay customers compo and stop using the pratice...

 

Does this mean that this investment firm have broke the law/ need reporting or what?

 

Never had dealings with this firm or come across them before

so before I make them a final payment offer I just wondered if I have ammo to twist their arms into taking a low offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These "artists" are connected to the Interlaken / Lowell / Fredrickson / B Carter etc etc etc etc etc Cesspit, very familiar companies to the debt community. A quick scan of their interests reveals just about everything except Mongolian Deep Sea Pie Fishing. Tucked away amongst them all lie your Merlingen and Moriarty.

 

http://www.directorsintheuk.co.uk/directors

postcode LS11 9BH

 

Sorry, couldn't post up link in proper html format. Phone in bad mood.

 

bart If you had a doorstep loan you need to do a CCA request. Many of them were not compliant and some lenders had no proper records. It's not my area but others will no doubt advise later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also was it a rollover?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moriaty Law is registered with the SRA and is the Debt Collection Arm of a full service law firm based in Essex.

Off shoot of US based multinational.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't a roll over just a small short term loan that was almost paid.... Were talking under £50!

 

I just never heard of or had dealings with this company before...

 

So hence I did a little digging to find the Boss of the DCA also set up the so called law firm.

 

Knowing they paid 10-20p in the pound for it I'll make them a one off, one time only offer lol

 

Believe it or not this sometimes works..

 

. Had Vanquis card with a balance of £350 and they took my one time only offer of £100 to clear the balance.

 

It just seemed very heavy handed tactics for such a small amount.

 

Been not one to give into these bully boys I like them to work for their money :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As posted previously Moriarty Law exists and is SRA registered and regulated.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I would advise you that Moriarty Law is not a law firm to take lightly.

 

My ex-housemate received a letter in July from them on behalf of Merliglen Investments for an old Shopacheck debt of £201.76.

 

Two weeks ago he received a letter from Northampton County Court as they had applied for a CCJ.

 

The balance owed now is £325.12.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£200 [shopacheck] welcome debt.

 

blimey the PPI alone

as well as the PENALTY charges will wipe it out.

 

shopacheck were doorsteppers I doubt a CCA exists.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've seen some awkward barstewards in the "debt industry " solicitor fraternity but Moriarty are the leaders imo.

 

Need a Sherlock to deal with them!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

their doorstepper loans always were very high interest.

are you confident the statements are correct?

 

have they produced the pages from the doorsteppers book

when he collected the payments?

 

and ofcourse you have the issue of his hidden commission to use too.

was this his only loan with the doorstepper

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He had Provident for a while too I think but he paid her off.

 

The guy always came round on a Monday and the dates that Shopacheck sent Merliglen match up to Mondays.

 

And the amounts paid match what the agreement said was to be paid every week.

 

I just thought that one letter from Moriarty Law

(who, even though in Guildford, gave Old Bailey as an address on their letter which was weird)

 

led to a CCJ was quick going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I had a small debt with a door step shark(Morses) which after the agent stopped collecting ended up going to a DCA.

 

This morning a letter from Moriarty Law came informing they intend to take court action...

 

After I stopped laughing I did a little digging and have found the following...

The address of this law firm 15 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EF is a virtual office..

 

. Bit more digging revels that the name of the firms director is also the same as Merligen Investments Ltd.

 

So in other words it's not a real law firm but a in house dept using a Virtual office to look like a real law firm......

 

Now I seen a some bits about this in the papers of late the biggest been Wonga who had to pay customers compo and stop using the pratice...

 

Does this mean that this investment firm have broke the law/ need reporting or what?

 

Never had dealings with this firm or come across them before

so before I make them a final payment offer I just wondered if I have ammo to twist their arms into taking a low offer.

 

Worth while remembering that THEY stopped collecting in the first place

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update:

 

I wrote to Moriarty Law with a settlement offer and explained my current situation to them.... They have responded with court summons!! These guys are one bunch of sick gits.. One of the reasons I'm behind with some of these minor payments is I'm still paying for my 6yr old daughters funeral... Any spare money I have goes to the undertakers....

 

I offered them £30 for a debt of £59 given that they only pay a max of 20p in the pound this I felt this was a fair offer.

 

I have about a week left before this is rubber stamped by the court and I get my first CCJ.... Is there any other action I can take other than pay it?

Edited by bart70
Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legals

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have filed for a CCJ for a debt of £59? These people are all kinds of wrong.

 

Its cost them £25 to issue the claim:!:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly from previous reading, when one of the Joneses - founders of Fredrickson / S R J - moved to this outfit, he stated that he would specialise in low value debts.

True to his word, it seems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bart, my sincere condolences for your loss. I do not know for sure but I would expect a judge to take the funeral expenses and the sad loss of your daughter into account if this ever went to court. You must be in bits I know I would be if it was one of my 3 daughters, good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please action post 20

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bart, my sincere condolences for your loss. I do not know for sure but I would expect a judge to take the funeral expenses and the sad loss of your daughter into account if this ever went to court. You must be in bits I know I would be if it was one of my 3 daughters, good luck.

 

 

I think any judge is going to be more than a little put out if not down right angry that this is out before them, a gross and unnecessary abuse of the court process to the level

of being vexatious.

 

 

IMO you could use this as part of the defence especially as you have made a reasonable offer of settlement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...