Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stolen phone bill £1,888 , unlimited liability. Vodafone - help ** Settled **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Get someone to film it, a genuine complaint, that's how Vodafone deal with people who complain, great customer service.

 

Also the Vodafone employees in the shop can go through the bill with you and explain any anomalies.

 

One of my links above shows that the Ombudsman will not deal in this matter.

 

As for forcibly being removed from a Vodafone store? Possibly!

 

If someone stood outside a Vodafone store giving out factual leaflets showing how Vodafone deals with complaints (as above), then there is absolutely nothing Vodafone staff, security staff or even the police can do to remove you. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Rebel you actually said that they should go into the shop and refuse to leave until they got hold of someone from head office . If they will not then you wouldn't leave.

 

Veganite, sorry which link says that the ombudsman will not deal with it , it clearly refers to the ombudsman in the Vodafone terms

 

Yes of course the OP wants it resolving but my personal view, after reading the terms, is that the best they can hope for is a reduction but even that may be unlikely.

 

There really is more info we need

i.e

last time definitely seen

whose contract is it

Was it secure in the hotel room

Was it reported to the police either here or in Spain as soon as reasonably possible after discovering the theft/loss

 

Maybe from the dates and times of calls some of that could be worked out

 

I am also curious how the OP has seen the text saying the account was locked without the phone

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I actually said was, 'sit in the store until somebody from H/O speaks to you', you need to be determined otherwise they will simply fob you off with, 'we can't do this, we can't do that', if they call the police fine, if asked to leave, then simply leave.

 

Info was provided by Vodafone, post 45:-

 

'I called vodafonelink3.gif again yesterday to ask what the text said which was sent to my son when his UK Plan was exceeded. This is what it said 'You have reached your Euro Traveller Allowance and your service is temporarily suspended. If you wish to reopen the line again, call 191 ...'

 

The text was sent at 12.19 on the 10th May per vodafonelink3.gif. I've just checked the itemised bill and at 12.18 there was a call in progress to an Estonia number, it lasted 17m.8s, taking the time to 12.35. At 12.35 the same number was dialled and lasted 0m 5s. This was followed at 12.35 by another call to the same number which lasted 15m 50s. This was followed by another call at 12.51 and so it goes on.

 

If the line was suspended, it wasn't at 12.19 as we can see from the bill. Also it means that if it was suspended, the thief wouldn't have had time to call 191 re the pattern of calls and the rapid dialling patterns. The other issue is that they wouldn't have got through your security anyway and so its looking likely that the line wasn't suspended.'

 

 

Rebel you actually said that they should go into the shop and refuse to leave until they got hold of someone from head office . If they will not then you wouldn't leave.

 

Veganite, sorry which link says that the ombudsman will not deal with it , it clearly refers to the ombudsman in the Vodafone terms

 

Yes of course the OP wants it resolving but my personal view, after reading the terms, is that the best they can hope for is a reduction but even that may be unlikely.

 

There really is more info we need

i.e

last time definitely seen

whose contract is it

Was it secure in the hotel room

Was it reported to the police either here or in Spain as soon as reasonably possible after discovering the theft/loss

 

Maybe from the dates and times of calls some of that could be worked out

 

I am also curious how the OP has seen the text saying the account was locked without the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point taken about the info on the txt, of course Voda can just deny that it was said or say he operator made an error.

 

I have always found that if you get to speak to someone in Stoke you get somehwre however I believe the other call centres are Durban and Egypt

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rebel you actually said that they should go into the shop and refuse to leave until they got hold of someone from head office . If they will not then you wouldn't leave.

 

Veganite, sorry which link says that the ombudsman will not deal with it , it clearly refers to the ombudsman in the Vodafone terms

 

Yes of course the OP wants it resolving but my personal view, after reading the terms, is that the best they can hope for is a reduction but even that may be unlikely.

 

There really is more info we need

i.e

last time definitely seen

whose contract is it

Was it secure in the hotel room

Was it reported to the police either here or in Spain as soon as reasonably possible after discovering the theft/loss

 

Maybe from the dates and times of calls some of that could be worked out

 

I am also curious how the OP has seen the text saying the account was locked without the phone

 

hello,

The link is here: http://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/aug/05/vodafone-stolen-sim-cards

In that article, it states that the Ombudsman will not deal with any complaints where a mobile network operator has met its contractual obligations. The problem OP has is that Vodafone are failing to engage in any further discussion in this matter. Also, Vodafone have informed OP that they need to contact the Ombudsman. Whilst Vodafone have not failed in their contractual obligations - this means that the Ombudsman can not intervene or investigate as shown in the article link above.

 

I find this situation appalling and a bad reflection on Vodafone. Not only are they failing to discuss this matter further with their customer, it can also be seen that they are 100% intent on making a profit from the stolen phone calls.

 

With all the tax dodges vodafone has got away with, it seems a company hell bent on making a profit under any circumstance.

https://www.google.ru/#newwindow=1&q=vodafone+tax+dodge+uk

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can not dispute anything that you have said with the caveat that the article was written in 2011 so things may have changed

 

As I said before I am no fan of the capitalist society however I fear we are stuck with it.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi fletch, i am living in an ex communist country, (Russia) and most people here who have experienced communist era would much prefer it to their present capitalism!

 

peopod - i've found a link whilst closing many browser windows, it's here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298750/Recruitment-worker-23-left-21-000-phone-thief-uses-stolen-mobile-premium-rate-spending-spree.html

 

In the article, a Vodafone spokesman states:

A spokesman said: ‘This is a very unusual case. Normally, the customer is liable for any charges up to the point they report their phone lost or stolen.

‘However, this phone seems to have been used as part of a deliberate and organised crime which we will be investigating.

‘In this case, we will waive all of the charges raised by this fraud.

 

Your phone / sons phone was also used for fraud - calling premium rate phone numbers. Vodafone did insist that the person is liable for the bill, but I guess they backed down when the media took on the story.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to go off track but from what I have experienced in ex eastern block countries ( I have visited many) people do seem to prefer the freedoms they now have to the totalitarian regime they lived under . Sadly there will always be people who look back and say things were better before and there will still be people alive in Russia that wish for the days of Stalin. I believe that as an ideal communism is great however it needs incorruptible people to run every layer of it and it needs a basic shift in human nature to make it work . We see too often , in every walk of life, in every hue of left and right people who are more concerned about their own egos than they are about liberty equality and fraternity

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee,

 

Thanks for your message. I sent the email yesterday as you advised.

 

I called Vodafone again yesterday to ask what the text said which was sent to my son when his UK Plan was exceeded. This is what it said 'You have reached your Euro Traveller Allowance and your service is temporarily suspended. If you wish to reopen the line again, call 191 ...'

 

The text was sent at 12.19 on the 10th May per Vodafone. I've just checked the itemised bill and at 12.18 there was a call in progress to an Estonia number, it lasted 17m.8s, taking the time to 12.35. At 12.35 the same number was dialled and lasted 0m 5s. This was followed at 12.35 by another call to the same number which lasted 15m 50s. This was followed by another call at 12.51 and so it goes on.

 

If the line was suspended, it wasn't at 12.19 as we can see from the bill. Also it means that if it was suspended, the thief wouldn't have had time to call 191 re the pattern of calls and the rapid dialling patterns. The other issue is that they wouldn't have got through your security anyway and so its looking likely that the line wasn't suspended.

 

In addition, having just gone through all of the calls, I've spotted something very odd: There are multiple calls to the same Estonia number, all at the same time:

 

- 12.01hrs 16m 39s cost 5.50

- 12.01hrs 17m 1s cost 5.67

- 12.18hrs 17m 8s cost 5.712

- 12.18hrs 16m 28s cost 5.48

- 12.35hrs15m 50s cost 5.41

- 12.35hrs 6m14s cot 2.20

 

This is the pattern throughout the bill. Also, I just noticed that although the majority of calls were to Estonia, there are some to Pakistan, Austria and Spain.

 

How can one phone/sim dial the same number at the same time whilst having up to 17 minutes per call please?

 

Just as odd is that the agent yesterday said we would now be passed onto the 'Bill shock' team, when asked why this was just happening, the agent said that Vodafone wanted to be sure that we were being billed correctly. If this is the case, why hasn't someone from Vodafone picked this up please?

 

Thanks Lee,

 

Peopod.

 

Hi Lee,

 

Did you see the above sent on Friday please, it's pretty important. I've just sent you a message via your 'help' line, quoting the code you gave me. Can you please have a look at it and get back to me.

 

Also I'm still waiting for a response to my email sent as you suggested last week, using the code you gave me, and my additional question asked on here, who is your mobile partner in Spain please?

 

Thanks,

Peopod

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peopod,

 

I can't see your email. So I can check again, let me know your email reference number from our automated reply.

 

If you didn't receive this, email me again via the Contact us here and make sure that the code WRT135 - CAG Forum is quoted in the subject line.

 

There are a few networks available in Spain, Vodafone Spain being one of them.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee,

 

Thanks for this.

 

I have sent two emails to the 'help' link you gave me and quoted WRT135 - CAG on both of them. I didn't receive an auto reply to either of these?

 

Assume you have the one I sent today as you've replied to me? it's concerning the multiple/same time calls and other destinations called. Can you confirm you have this please to be on the safe side.

 

I'll have to do the email I sent on Thursday again as I don't know how to retrieve emails sent through your 'help' link.

 

Thanks,

 

Peopod,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally ask Vodafone for my PAC code and transfer it to another company before they trash your credit file.

Let them chase you for the money with their dodgy debt collectors who can be easy to get rid of.

 

Vodafone should have something in place for customers when their usage pattern changes, from £30 a month constantly to

almost £2000, certainly strange usage and should have been stopped at around the £50 mark and the customer concerned contacted.

They should not be making profit from a crime.

 

George

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peopod,

 

I can't see your email. So I can check again, let me know your email reference number from our automated reply.

 

If you didn't receive this, email me again via the Contact us here and make sure that the code WRT135 - CAG Forum is quoted in the subject line.

 

There are a few networks available in Spain, Vodafone Spain being one of them.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

 

Lee,

 

Communicating with Vodafone is proving very difficult . It's now 03.43 hours and I can't sleep because the deadline for deadlock expires tomorrow. You offered to extend this last Thursday but as I write, I've absolutely no idea if this has been done or not...

 

- I've done as you've asked and sent two emails into you using the 'help' link you provided and had no response to either.

- Yesterday you told me you couldn't see these emails, why?

- You also said that I should have had an auto reply, I didn't, Why?

- You said in your communication on here yesterday after I'd sent yet another message to you on here yesterday asking if you received my message posted on Friday at 10.40,: 'If you didn't receive this, email me again via the Contact us here and make sure that the code WRT135 - CAGicon Forum is quoted in the subject line.. Why wouldn't I receive and 'automated' email if that is how the system is set up?

 

Further,

 

- I sent you details, via this forum, of duplicate/same time calls on Friday at 10.40hrs. I've had no response from you regarding this, Why?

- I asked you again in my post yesterday, via this forum, but still no response regarding this, just a message to say you didn't receive my emails Why? I realise that you probably don't want to discuss issues on here directly but I can't seem to find any other way of communicating with you outside this forum

- On Thursday I sent another message on here asking for the details of your Spanish Mobile partner, and again asked for this yesterday, I've had no response to either of these requests, why?

 

One of my emails contained confidential information which I don't want to publish on here and requested formally that you extent the deadlock as per your advice to me. It's now 6 days on and I'm absolutely no further forward.

 

Please see link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298750/Recruitment-worker-23-left-21-000-phone-thief-uses-stolen-mobile-premium-rate-spending-spree.html

 

This case is exactly the same as our, even down the location. This poor persons bill was £21,000 but was waived because it was deemed 'organised crime'. If our case was being looked at by Vodafone to check that the bill was correct before it was passed to the 'Bill Shock' team, why didn't someone:

- pick up the duplicate / same time / same number calls and if they did, why didn't anyone tell us, given the quote from Vodafone contained in the article please?

 

I've emailed you again, to your help line provided in your message, but given that I did this 6 days ago, didn't receive an auto reply, I don't see why my emails should get through this time round here. The Deadlock hold expires tomorrow and so far and regardless of how I try and communicate with Vodafone, I just don't make any headway.

 

I didn't want to post this on here as I'd really rather just stay with the issue I have but given the above, I'm running out of ideas of how else I can communicate.

 

Peopod

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Does anyone know where I can get a list of premium rate numbers for Pakistan, Austria and Spain please. We have at least one premium rate number for Estonia and so chances are that the others are premium rate.

 

Thanks

 

Peopod

Link to post
Share on other sites

I

 

Vodafone should have something in place for customers when their usage pattern changes, from £30 a month constantly to

almost £2000, certainly strange usage and should have been stopped at around the £50 mark and the customer concerned contacted.

They should not be making profit from a crime.

 

George

 

They absolutely do. All networks do. The problem is that when someone is overseas, Vodafone (and all other networks) are reliant on those foreign networks being able to transfer to the call data over in a timely fashion. Sadly, it can take a few days - and the data is often transferred over in chunks at a time. This means that criminals have a short window before the call bars are actioned. This is usually longer if someone is roaming on a network which isn't under the same umbrella as the 'home' network.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, The Euro Package comes with a text whilst overseas which says you've exceeded your allowance. Vodafone say they were temporarily suspending my sons line but it doesn't appear to have been as there is no break in calls. Either way, the fact they send a text as part of the T/C's means they have sight of the calls and any patterns.

 

The main question now is how to find out where I can find a comprehensive list of premium rate numbers for the countries I've listed. Any ideas please?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They absolutely do. All networks do. The problem is that when someone is overseas, Vodafone (and all other networks) are reliant on those foreign networks being able to transfer to the call data over in a timely fashion. Sadly, it can take a few days - and the data is often transferred over in chunks at a time. This means that criminals have a short window before the call bars are actioned. This is usually longer if someone is roaming on a network which isn't under the same umbrella as the 'home' network.

 

Whilst that is true, I find it extremely hard to believe. My opinion is that this is an excuse used by the networks. For example, if you were to use a pay as you go phone abroad, as soon as it runs out of credit you can't make any further calls. I know this from experience (since I would never have a contract phone).

 

I fail to see the difference between a contract phone updating and a pay as you go phone updating, the networks say that they don't receive the updates - yet if this is correct, how is it that pay as you go phones do not endlessly go on making calls after the credit is expired?

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They use different systems. The PAYG isn't reliant on the foreign network in that regard. I worked in the mobile industry from 1998-2006. I don't know what has happened since then as far as the technology is concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Does anyone know where I can get a list of premium rate numbers for Pakistan, Austria and Spain please. We have at least one premium rate number for Estonia and so chances are that the others are premium rate.

 

Thanks

 

Peopod

 

 

Numbers starting with 80 and 90 are used for premium rates, toll free, and internet access numbers. 803, 806, and 807 prefixes are used for premium rate calls, where the caller pays a fixed amount of money per minute. 905 numbers are supposed to be used for voting systems. Calls have a limited duration (typically 3 minutes), and are charged a fixed rate per call.

Above from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_Spain

 

Premium Rate services:

 

  • 0900 xxxxx

Above from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_Pakistan

 

09 xxx Premium Rate

Above from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_Austria

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They use different systems. The PAYG isn't reliant on the foreign network in that regard. I worked in the mobile industry from 1998-2006. I don't know what has happened since then as far as the technology is concerned.

 

So, they use different systems? One system for contract phones which does not make provision to update daily (therefore helping to make network operator a profit in the case of stolen phones) and - a different system for Pay As You Go phones (helping to make the network operator not to suffer a loss in the event of a stolen mobile) since the Pay As You Go system updates?

 

So they use a system on PAYG phones so they don't suffer a loss in event of stolen phone, yet they can't use the same system for contract phones?

 

Using different systems in my opinion is unfair and detrimental to people with contract phones.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Using different systems in my opinion is unfair and detrimental to people with contract phones.

 

Not when they're doing two different jobs. It's a bit like trying to use Microsoft Outlook to make a spreadsheet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not when they're doing two different jobs. It's a bit like trying to use Microsoft Outlook to make a spreadsheet.

 

I am not sure how they are doing two different jobs since the contract system keeps track of usage and the PAYG system also keeps track of usage. The only difference I see is that the contract system updates sporadically, perhaps a few hours delay or a days delay and the PAYG system updates immediately, in real time.

 

Contract system = Slow to update, makes customer liable in event of stolen phone so that the mobile operator can profit from the theft.

PAYG system = protects the mobile network operator since no calls can be made when credit is finished.

 

Since mobile network operators have in place a system for PAYG phones which updates itself immediately, I fail to see why they can not use the same system for contract phones.

I strongly suspect that in the case of contract phones, they can see this data and it is updated immediately, though they are reliant on the excuse that they can not see such data because the customer is then liable.

 

After all, they can see the data in respect of PAYG phones and yet they claim they can not see this data in the case of contract phones. I can not see any reason why they would use a 'lesser' system for contract phones.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...