Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Customer Compliance Arranged Telephone Interview


PomBlue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm new here and am not too sure if this is the right section for this.

 

 

I have been sent a letter from the DWP with a time and date when they will phone to carry out a Customer Compliance Interview over the phone. I've read on this site that these are generated by a computer and are unlikely to be specifically aim at me on suspicion that I've done something wrong. I've also read that they focus on your bank accounts etc but unless they have acquired these by some other means they are not going to have them to view at the interview. If anyone has had these prearranged interviews, over the phone, I would be interested to know what they actually ask.

 

 

I have a speech impediment and suffer from depression and poor sleep patterns and I don't take even mild pressure at all well. This usually results in me being almost mute. I have also read that they don't familiarize themselves with the client's details (I have found in the past with other things this to be true) so having to convey my situation at the outset is going to be stressful.

 

 

Can anyone advise on this?......and I hope I can find this when I return...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you give permission someone can speak on the phone on your behalf. The just need to pass the phone over at the beginning to do the security questions and then the other person can handle the call and explain the situation. Then the compliance officer can decide how they want to proceed.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm new here and am not too sure if this is the right section for this.

 

 

I have been sent a letter from the DWP with a time and date when they will phone to carry out a Customer Compliance Interview over the phone. I've read on this site that these are generated by a computer and are unlikely to be specifically aim at me on suspicion that I've done something wrong. I've also read that they focus on your bank accounts etc but unless they have acquired these by some other means they are not going to have them to view at the interview. If anyone has had these prearranged interviews, over the phone, I would be interested to know what they actually ask.

 

 

I have a speech impediment and suffer from depression and poor sleep patterns and I don't take even mild pressure at all well. This usually results in me being almost mute. I have also read that they don't familiarize themselves with the client's details (I have found in the past with other things this to be true) so having to convey my situation at the outset is going to be stressful.

 

 

Can anyone advise on this?......and I hope I can find this when I return...

I don't have anyone locally or free at this time to do this.

 

 

I'm more interested in what they are going to ask, what I should expect. Not knowing this and being in the dark on this issue just makes me feel at a disadvantage. You know, information is power.

 

 

Often slowness and pauses are read as a sign of guilt or an effort to hide something. I will, of course, start off by trying to convey my situation to the person.

 

 

Anyway, thank you for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Customer compliance interviews are not indicative that your under suspicion or have done something wrong. It's merely a check that the payments you're receiving are for the same set of circumstances you declared - they'll ask to see proof of savings/bank statement, who lives with you etc x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Customer compliance interviews are not indicative that your under suspicion or have done something wrong. It's merely a check that the payments you're receiving are for the same set of circumstances you declared - they'll ask to see proof of savings/bank statement, who lives with you etc x

It's a phone call, how will they see the proofs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is to prompt you to declare any changes in circumstances. In my CC interview they just photocopied my passport, tenancy agreement, landlord's statement that all the bills are in his name because I am a lodger, his utility bills, his TV licence, my 6 months worth of bank statements.

 

I wrote a letter to explain what the small cash payments made into my bank account were [to round up balance to £10 to enable me to withdraw all my money as can not pay by card].

 

Someone said she had to show the receipt about £9 loose change she paid into her own account. You sold something on E-bay, the £20 shows in your statement: income.

 

I have read the costumer compliance guidance and it is not true that they pick ppl randomly. There are certain risk groups upon whom they do random checks. Eg self-employed started claiming JSA / claimant recently separated from partner.

 

Where there is a fraud allegation but they do not have evidence, they do a CCI. Eg your ex claims you working as a hair dresser but not declaring it. He can not show any evidence, DWP can not find any evidence so they ask for bank statements to see if any income apart from what you declared / apart from benefits.

 

Please update us to say whether you were asked to show documents I listed above as it is pretty standard.

 

My JCP manager said it is because I finished the Work Programme, to update my file. Can not really believe it but never mind. Asked him why it is called CCI then. He said because they have nothing else to call it.

 

The adviser who was supposed to interview me was struck down by God [had an accident] so was not present. Another adviser photocopied my documents and manager claims that that was it: there will be no interview and no questions asked.

 

To OP: If it was anything serious, the fraud team would be dealing with it, not CC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCOI1 is the standard letter they should send but they change the wording to make it sound like you are guilty.

 

"A query has arisen about your entitlement" is not in the standard letter.

 

Form / statement MF47 is what you supposed to fill out during the interview.[ATTACH=CONFIG]49086[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]49087[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beatrice the OP has told us it's a telephone interview so an interview is taking place and questions will be asked.

 

PornBlue what I told you was personal experience, only a few months ago. Maybe they'll ask you to bring them in later or maybe they won't require any documents. The telephone interview will determine what happens next. If you feel you can't speak to them over the phone arrange an appointment to go in

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on my details if this will help those replying, I'm in the Support Group and recently I have had an ATOS medical at home. After the initial shock of the letter had subsided I thought all this arrangement of a phone call was because of the status of my claim i.e. my health etc.????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Additionally, reading above and other threads about the wording of these letters my letter has nothing too aggressive. The worst is, "When you claimed benefit you agreed to tell us immediately if the circumstances relating to your benefit entitlement changed." And then goes on to say that if there has been an unreported change then any overpayments will have to be paid back. This is pretty standard for almost all their correspondence is it not...?

 

 

Unless they are playing the softly, softly approach before they pounce...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had this telephone interview and the guy seemed to be too helpful at times warning me about reaching that £6000 level and so on. He typed out the main details of the info I gave him and these will be posted to me. I asked about "what next?" and he said there'll be no further action and my benefits won't change based on the phone call.

 

 

The only odd thing, which I've had before, was that he said the NHRC (who ever they are) had informed them that I had (or had had) an ISA with £8000 in it. When this came up before about two years ago and I told the guy I had no ID with a photo on it he went cold and never contacted me again. This gave me the impression that someone had used my details to open up such an account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only odd thing, which I've had before, was that he said the NHRC (who ever they are) had informed them that I had (or had had) an ISA with £8000 in it.

 

Might that have been HMRC ?

It may be worth your while asking for a search of bank accounts over on http://www.mylostaccount.org.uk/ to see if it turns up any information. The search won't cost you anything, and if the DWP ask again, you can tell them that you have made every effort to locate this ISA that they claim you have - It won't reveal any accounts that have been closed, just the dormant ones if they exist.

 

It is possible that someone along the way linked this account to your national insurance number in error, or it might have been a fishing trip on the part of the DWP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...