Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

citi A word of encouragement for citi claimants


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When Citi did not file a defence against my claim I got a judgement, only for them to have it set aside claiming they had not received the particulars. I have now received their defence and the AQ's have been submitted to the Court.

Good luck with your claim.

surely once or twice not getting the paperwork will be accepted but there seems to be a bit of a trend going on here. Come on Mr Judge do your stuff and give Citi a good swift kick in the ......

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It seems LTWFB has found fame in all our defences as being the case that lost. shame i didnt change my name to Mr Citicardsareawunchofbankers V Citicards. That would make an interesting line in the letter

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems LTWFB has found fame in all our defences as being the case that lost. shame i didnt change my name to Mr Citicardsareawunchofbankers V Citicards. That would make an interesting line in the letter

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isnt it Depoll you`d have to go through.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ltwf

 

Just subing to thread, pm me if you want some support at next day in court as i believe a Mr Jones the butcher once said " they don't like it up 'em"

 

Stuart:p

If I have helped then please click on my scales.

 

Ulster bank

---------------------------------------------------

05/10/06 DPR letter sent

06/11/06 Request of repayment sent £1186.06

20/11/06 Repayment deadline

21/11/06 LBA sent

25/11/06 £90 goodwill gesture letter received

06/12/06 LBA deadline

09/12/06 Received final response to claim

I will register smallclaim in new year once Jan paycheque is in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks to Empire Strikes Back,I have been alerted to the fact that Citi are sending our personal,court and financial information to other people in an attempt to back up their attempts to deter further litigation.I have concrete proof of this,as ESB has provided this for me.They sent my details to him along with the letter referring to our juduicially mishandled claim.They grovelled to the court for confidentiality as to their charges,and send ours all over the place.The judge concerned has been alerted to this in writing

 

And as Citi are reading,I have alerted as many statutory bodies as possible,as well as Mohammad Sawar MP in order to get them in as much hot water as humanly possible.

 

This leaves us open to ID theft,and I hope Citi get a real good roasting for it!!!

 

Just picked this story up from the newsletter. Utterly scandalous.

 

Why not ask them for compensation? (maybe even sue them for compensation) And to twist the knife, why not make the amount of compensation equal to the difference between what you were awarded in court and what you claimed for?! :-D

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just picked this story up from the newsletter. Utterly scandalous.

 

Why not ask them for compensation? (maybe even sue them for compensation) And to twist the knife, why not make the amount of compensation equal to the difference between what you were awarded in court and what you claimed for?! :-D

 

What newsletter?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just caught up with this thread today and have read it with interest. I've now subscribed so I can see what happens before I start this process with them. Might mean a change to the letters I send.

 

I also have a cunning plan that can be deployed if we can't budge them past £12. If any of the Mods are interested at this stage, please PM me.

 

 

theskev

theskev

 

 

Disclaimer: Posts that I make in these forums are my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in any doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I recall, the case filings are a matter of public record, as are any judgements. The details of the cases themselves (anything beyond "Boddy vs Robin Bank plc") and any settlements reached out of court, however, are not. It is down to either party to decide whether or not they publish the details of the settlement - the court does not do it for them.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I recall, the case filings are a matter of public record, as are any judgements. The details of the cases themselves (anything beyond "Boddy vs Robin Bank plc") and any settlements reached out of court, however, are not. It is down to either party to decide whether or not they publish the details of the settlement - the court does not do it for them.

 

Well PoC, Defence, Reply, N244 are all filings. So they can be disclosed?

 

As well as details of a judgement which says "Case dismissed" or "Defendant to pay to the Claimant the amount of £XXX.XX as previously offered."

 

Ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to promotion and consequent pressure of work, I have not been as active on this site of late as I would like to have been and have only just seen this thread upon reading the CAG Newsletter that drew attention to it.

 

LTWFB I'm pleased to see you are challenging the outcome of your hearing on 26/9. Just from what you have posted, I believe you have grounds for appeal - whether you should or not is a matter for you to decide. I propose to say no more about it here but for the benefit of the Citi folk who I know like to read this thread too, I speak in a professional capacity.

 

Originally posted by andrew1:

 

It's a pity nobody saw this coming.

 

Dunno about that andrew - I posted back in May on another thread about the likelihood of the small claims court just following the OFT guidelines and that it was important to prepare your case to deal with that approach only to have an anonymous comment made on my reputation that my post was "not helping and even inaccurate in places". Hmmmm really? I don't think so.

 

No-one should be put off pursuing these claims by LTWFB's experience. It really is past high time that the Government through its quango the OFT, sorted this mess out instead of tax payers money being wasted by banks petulantly trying to defend the indefensible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTWFB, best of luck with your appeal. I appreciate you might not want to say too much on this thread but can I ask if you were successful in your claim for the interest on the charges?

 

I'm asking this as I've had a bit of a thought but your response may answer this so I'll say no more for the time being.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hei is coping very well tho !:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi there,im currently making a claim against Citi cards using moneyclaim online,im halfway through the process,im having a bit of trouble deciding exactly what address to put for citi,im also not sure what other info to put in the 'particulars of claim',could you please please give me a bit of help? Aren't citi a bit awkward to deal with these days?Thankyou-Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,im currently making a claim against Citi cards using moneyclaim online,im halfway through the process,im having a bit of trouble deciding exactly what address to put for citi,im also not sure what other info to put in the 'particulars of claim',could you please please give me a bit of help? Aren't citi a bit awkward to deal with these days?Thankyou-Craig

 

Citi havealways been a bit awkward - use the reading address that is their registered office.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...