Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

citi A word of encouragement for citi claimants


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok,thankyou very much for that! Could you please help me with the 'particulars of claim' bit? So confusing but i am ready and willing to learn....

 

Have a look here at no 4 and 5 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

 

all you need is there

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi - been following your fighting successes and fair play to you! you've certainly encouraged me to fight! hope you dont mind but i've borrowed some of your letter wording to northern bank for my own letter to them. on 14 feb i gave them 7 days to pay up and yesterday they wrote(registered post) asking for a meeting to resolve the problem. so using your letter to them agreeing to a meeting under your terms i've done something similar. not sure whether to use it or just press on with court. whats the chances of them paying up as easy as that? we'll see. i'll keep you posted. best of luck with your ongoing battles!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I have not been in as much lately Whats this letter to Northern can someone post it or pm me a copy. That would be great.(just curious!)

 

This for me has been dragging on now since last June and it's time to up the anti. I dont believe Citi can find the agreement that I allegedly signed, accepting their terms, of charges and fines and extortion!).

 

However it makes a big dent in their defence that I have agreed etc etc. if they cant produce it.

 

I am still waiting a response from my local court they seem pretty inept (I will divuldge when a conclusion has been reached) as to were I am up to with them.

 

When I get a day off I will persue this further.

 

Cheers

 

pj

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok, i got laid off a few months back (i was a bus driver), citi started calling when payments got missed and as most people in my position do i ignored the problem, when i eventually spoke to them i was very supprised. The girl i spoke to sent me a form to fill in which wasnt easy to follow but i got there in the end. i sent that back and after a few weeks i receaved a statment that still had charges on it, i called to find out why and it had apparently never been receaved. i was not pleased by far but then the person i spoke to completed the form with me over the phone (not sure why this couldnt have been done in the first place), they said they would carry out a credit check and i asked why which i wont go into now but it was a reasonable enough answer. 2 days later i receaved a call to say that i was now on reduced payments and all interest and fees had been frozen, i asked about the previous fees and the person agreed to refund the 3 fees i had receaved at £25 but the other 2 at £12 would remain, i agreed to this...........so, although not entirley a smooth operation i found them to quite resonable and it makes me wonder if it was a fairly easy thing for me to do then how come everyone else is having so much trouble??????. i have since tried this with other creditors and with the exception of hsbc im pretty much sorted. what im trying to say is that by talking to my creditors i have avoided massive charges and avoided court, so why is everyone else having so much trouble?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your situation is different to most here - in fact they have still charged you £36 in penalty fees which you have acepted. The credit check would have shown hat you were short paying other people at present as well.

Every one else is having trouble because Citi choose to delay claims and interprept the OFT statement to suit their choice of words.

 

Yes they really are that bad.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just what I was thinking

Jax

 

Marbles/HSBC - SETTLED IN FULL

Beneficial/HSBC - SETTLED IN FULL 01/08/2006

NatWest Cr Cd - SETTLED IN FULL in respect of default judgement obtained 06/09/06

Natwest - SETTLED IN FULL 20/10/06

Abbey T/A Business Account - SETTLED IN FULL 07/03/2006 :grin:

Abbey Current Account - SETTLED IN FULL 16/03/2006 :grin:

Citi - SETTLED IN FULL 17/05/2007 :D

Natwest Business Account - On going

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Brian!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find all this refreshingly average-don't you giz??

 

Absolutely my friend - our poster has enormous problems yet finds time to praise Citi on your thread - refreshing indeed, just less than 24 hours before my order is due to be complied with - average response expected;)

 

E-mailed you LTWFB

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely my friend - our poster has enormous problems yet finds time to praise Citi on your thread - refreshing indeed, just less than 24 hours before my order is due to be complied with - average response expected;)

 

E-mailed you LTWFB

 

Would have thought someone would have been busy burning the midnight oil... after our information says that Citi are struggling to deal with the number of complaints (at least that was the situation a couple of weeks ago).

 

Despite your first post being on this thread "all.seeing.eye", if your genuine you must have phoned a Citi employee on a very good day as everyone elses experiences have been far from positive.

 

If your not genuine, live in Manchester and are under the employ of a certain financial institution I wonder if your trying to provoke a negative response so you can take printouts from this forum into court.

 

I am aware that Brian Smith has done this in the past.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

citicards were asked for a CCA a number of weeks ago-not a sausage,even when they were reminded about the default when they tried to threaten a (second) default(naughty naughty citi) on the account but were poiltely told where they could put their default

 

now we have just had a "termination of agreement letter" demanding the full balance

 

does this constitute unlawful recision?

 

certainly hope so!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interested to see this, I have a few in this situation but unsure how to proceed

 

Ideas LTWFB?

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately I'm in the dark here as this is an area I have little knowledge of

 

although there are members here who do know their stuff on this subject

 

I do know citi do not furnish agreements,and I have it on fairly good authority that they are instructed not to supply them when requested

 

the fact that there isn't one in many cases might have a lot of bearing on that!! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Interested to see you write that Citicards do not provide agreements!

 

My Citi account (taken out in 2002) is in dispute. I requested my CCA back in October and subsequently sent the reminder letter and then the default letter. Not had any response to any of my letters, so I put my payments to them on hold.

 

Citi call me almost every day. One day back in January I decided to speak with them when they called, and I asked where my CCA was? They denied receiving any letters at all from me, even though I have proof of delivery and even have the name of the guy at Citi who signed for the letters. They said that the last payment I made to my account was £1 back in October. I told the guy that that would be the £1 postal order that was stapled to the CCA request that they claimed they never received!! :lol:

 

Today I received a Default Notice from them, saying that the debt will be sold on at the end of this month. I guess I should now just sit tight and then send the "bemused" letter to whoever it gets passed on to next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...