Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC - Paid an F&F to clear a CCJ - now chasing the rest.


large boy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had a recent experience and would like some advice please.

 

I had a debt with HSBC bank which covered two separate accounts.

 

I received a number of letters from a firm of solicitors in Birmingham with all sorts of threats and

finally there were two CCJ's issued against me.

 

I finally had some money and sent them a cheque with a covering letter.

 

 

The cheque was for 5750 against a total debt of around 9k and

sent an accompanying letter which stated very clearly that the offer was as full and final settlement

on all accounts held with HSBC and the solicitors.

 

The cheque was cashed

 

After a period of a few months, I then received a letter saying that I still owed money and when was I going to pay?

 

I wrote to them, with a copy of the letter saying full and final settlement,

they now are refusing to accept the letter ever existed and,

strangely, they have no letter that was sent with the cheque.

 

They are now threatening me again and

 

 

I keep telling them they accepted the payment as full and final settlement

and have suggested my next step is to send all the correspondence to the county court

and ask for the ccj to be removed

 

Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can now get them to accept they have made a mistake and the debt is legally cleared please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am guessing you mean D G solicitors Calthorpe Rd Edgbaston who are part of HSBC.

 

I am not exactly sure but I think you may have to apply to the court and fight your corner .

 

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but sending money without an agreement from the creditor seems a bit foolish to me. Sorry to sound harsh as I am sure it seemed a watertight process at the time.

 

Hope someone can give you real help

 

You might find this interesting

http://www.wragge.com/published_articles_3312.asp

 

http://www.dwf.co.uk/news/legal-updates/cheques-tendered-in-full-and-final-settlement

Edited by fletch70

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fletch

 

Yes, you are right, it is DG Solicitors

 

Thank you for the articles, they are interesting reading

 

I know it sounds stupid but, I even had the letter and cheque being sealed in the envelope, witnessed by solicitors and they still refuse to accept the letter ever existed

 

I know they are trying to use scare tactics and cover their mistake so I'm more than happy to approach the courts

 

Does anyone else have any suggestions please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you have a solicitor witness it and is prepared to make a witness statement to that effect , a non legal opinion thinks you will have a good chance. Good luck

 

years ago I had a ccj with them and when I stopped paying they passed it to MCS (HSBC again) and then to moorcrap . They will have to go back to court to enforce so you can either be proactive or reactive..get some advice from the legal bods on here

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

never ever send a payment in F&F unless you have it in writing first that they agree to it. Otherwise they will take it in part payment and keep chasing you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too late to say that now but there is some case law to back up the OPs case. They accepted the cheque and left it a good period of time before rejecting the offer. Now he has to prove they got the letter

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cheque was cashed by them, yes ?

 

I find it strange that someone would send a cheque without a letter saying what hte money was for !!

 

Did you send it to the solicitor or HSBC ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a valid reason to make application to set a side the judgment..

....not a valid reason to commence further litigation on the same matter..

..res judicata ..the matter has already been adjudged.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent them proof of this?

 

 

Sounds like they have no records of it on their system so you should send them a copy of the cheque,

copy of the covering letter and confirmation from the solicitor that witnessed it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failing the above and they ignore that..

 

 

.the only way they can attempt to get the balance is by executing the judgment for the difference.

..but you can challenge that if and when.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Dear everyone

 

 

I had a CCJ a few years ago and, the total amount was around £7.5K

 

 

I sent the solicitors concerned a cheque for £%,750 with a letter saying ti was full and final settlement

 

 

They cashed the cheque and I heard nothing for a long time but now they are chasing me for the rest

 

 

How do I get the CCJ removed as they accepted the cheque so I was informed by a solicitor, the debt is settled

 

 

How can they now chase me again and, how do I stop them please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to agree it before you send it. Otherwise they'll take it as part payment and continue.chasing you for the rest.

 

The ccj will stay there for 6 years whether you pay it or not. You can get a certificate of satisfaction if it's paid up.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the letter you sent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

could you tell us the details of the debt please

and the history?

 

 

when was the CCJ attained

 

 

did you contest it?

 

 

name names too please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha found your old thread and merged it here.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you've asked this question before too. and gotten answers.

 

now you ask the same question again.

 

ok.

 

you indicate they got TWO CCJ's

so I don't think that you can cover both in the same F&F letter/cheque?

 

as a side note

If this was HSBC, I bet this was a managed loan?

they merged accounts covered by the CCA and say a bank account NOT covered by the CCA?

 

could be some reclaiming to do here too?

 

have you ever sent HSBC an SAR?

 

 

might be an idea to go get your credit file

and tell us what actually does show?

 

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it is HSBC who are now contacting me directly as they are no longer using their solicitors?

 

 

The CCJ was a long time ago, I can't remember when exactly but, I guess around 5 years ago?

 

 

I honestly can't remember if I contested it either, it was so long ago but I can't imagine I wouldn't have

Link to post
Share on other sites

go get your credit file from noddle please - see below.

 

 

what shows?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right so only ONE CCJ not two.

 

 

if you've not actually got a copy of it

I'd be ringing northants and getting one sent to you.

 

 

an sar to HSBC might not go amiss too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...