Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to apply for court order to get unlawful clamp removed?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What kind of proceedings do I need to issue to get a court order against a bailiff ordering him to remove an unlawfully applied car clamp?Please be specific , i.e. what is the exact wording of the order am I seeking,what kind of court do I apply to, what forms to I use to apply for the order,what do I put on the forms. Do I issue the proceedings against the individual bailiff or the firm he works for? I want to issue proceedings against the bailiff or his company NOT the local authority

 

Background is the car is owed by a limited company (and this can be proved). The car has been clamped under a council tax liability order against an individual. Bailiff has been made aware that car is owned by third party but has refused to remove clamp.

 

Only documentation left through letter box when car was clamped was “Removal Notice (car details) clamped to be removed. Magistrates Liability order dated xxx arrears of council tax due to xxx total outstanding xxx, I have today attended your premises with the intention of levying and removing your goods and chattels to the auction value of xxx. I will be re-attending and goods may be removed even in your absence. If you wish to avoid this distressing course of action Telephone Immediately”

 

Options I’ve already considered but can’t see that they would work are

 

1) Issuing an interpleader summons. Can’t do that as car has not been actually seized, only clamped. No valid levy has been made (or if it had it has been abandoned) so can’t use interpleader route

 

2) Issuing proceedings under Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. S3 looks the most promising. However the relief available is only for delivery of the goods and/or damages. The goods haven’t been removed, just clamped

 

3) Issuing form 4 complaint against bailiff, Not a good idea as potential to be very expensive if costs are awarded. Also only deals with Bailiff fitness to hold certificate, does nothing on getting clamp removed

 

4) Issuing proceedings under Protection from Harassment Act 1997 S3. Difficult as owner of vehicle is a company, not a person, and act appears to be very much aimed at protecting real persons from harassment

 

5) Issuing proceedings under The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992, Section 46. Looks promising but is only available against levy or attempt to levy. No valid levy appears to have been made, merely the car has been clamped. Also this route only appears available to the person that the levy was aimed against, not a third party company

 

Note that the advice sought for now is just to get a court to order the clamp removed. The financial lost incurred, hire of other cars,time, and trouble, is a question for another day once the clamp has been removed

Any advice gratefully gratefully received and will post success (or non-success) story

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Larcy.

 

In order to give advice it would be helpful to have some background information.

 

Which council issued the Liability Order?

 

How much is the LO for ( according to the council and not the bailiff)

 

What fees have been charged?

 

Which bailiff co?

 

What proof has been provided?

 

How long has car been clamped?

 

Have you spoken to the council?

 

At the moment please do not be tempted to remove the clamp as it is now common practice for bailiff companies to add fees of around £300 to accounts when this happens.

 

PS:

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT

 

Am I right that there is no lawful authority for bailiffs to clamp a car for council tax ?

 

That the Police will ask for the clamp to be removed, unless the bailiffs show that they have lawful authority from a court or specifically in legislation to clamp the car.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Larcy.

 

In order to give advice it would be helpful to have some background information.

 

Which council issued the Liability Order?

 

How much is the LO for ( according to the council and not the bailiff)

 

What fees have been charged?

 

Which bailiff co?

 

What proof has been provided?

 

How long has car been clamped?

 

Have you spoken to the council?

 

At the moment please do not be tempted to remove the clamp as it is now common practice for bailiff companies to add fees of around £300 to accounts when this happens.

 

PS:

 

Hi

 

Thanks for your reply, but I don't think providing a lot of that on a public forum would be a good idea as it would enable Bailiff to identify the case

 

No fees have been charged

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT

 

Am I right that there is no lawful authority for bailiffs to clamp a car for council tax ?

 

That the Police will ask for the clamp to be removed, unless the bailiffs show that they have lawful authority from a court or specifically in legislation to clamp the car.

 

I would agree with that, but I think the Police would not be interested and would just fall back on the "its a civil matter" excuse. Which I'm inclined to agree with. So the question then becomes what civil proceedings need to be issued to obtain court order that bailiff remove clamp

Link to post
Share on other sites

a

I would agree with that, but I think the Police would not be interested and would just fall back on the "its a civil matter" route. Which I'm inclined to agree with. So the question then becomes what civil proceedings need to be issued to obtain court order that bailiff remove clamp

 

In this situation, you should call the Police, as the bailiff cannot clamp a car for council tax and leave. The Police should arrange for the bailiff to remove the clamp to avoid you cutting it off, which could lead to an offence of criminal damage.

 

You could to to court and ask for some form of injunction, but this would cost you and I doubt it would be quick.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

a

 

In this situation, you should call the Police, as the bailiff cannot clamp a car for council tax and leave. The Police should arrange for the bailiff to remove the clamp to avoid you cutting it off, which could lead to an offence of criminal damage.

 

You could to to court and ask for some form of injunction, but this would cost you and I doubt it would be quick.

 

Thanks for your reply

 

What Court, and what form of injunction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply

 

What Court, and what form of injunction?

 

Not my area of knowledge. Quick reading suggests an anti-harrassment injunction specific to the issue of the car being clamped.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its been proves to belong to a limited company and hes ignored this he would be in deep do do if he prodeeded to remove and Sell the car. Provide this proof to the local authority if u havng already done so as they are soley responsible for their clients actions.

 

Im suprized the idiot bailiff is taking this to this point he should know himself hed be up a certain creek without a paddle if he proceeds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many bailiffs simply dont care and try and bluff the debtor in order to get fees.

 

Becoming a bailiff is pretty easy and has the potential through dubious practices to be a major money earner. Thats why you always see **** of society becoming bailiffs.

 

They act compassionate through their training period, then once they are registered, the rule book gets thrown away and the criminal acts begin giving the entire industry a bad name.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A suitable officer of the Ltd Co would have to do it.

If I were such I would just pitch up at the local county court and talk to the admin staff and explain what has happened and that I am seeking whatever order of the court is appropriate to get the unlawfully distrained property returned today.

they will know what judges are in that day, who is best to hear you and what their schedule looks like. This should also navigate away from and any potential paperwork errors.

take proof of ownership (NOT 'keepership') of the vehicle. Proof that the LO is for someone else and proof of being duly authorised by the Ltd Co. And good ID.

 

Of course this needs the admin staff to be helpful. And most often they are.

I would start in the vein:

I need your help. I am an innocent third party suffering ongoing damage and I am here to seek relief through the court today.

And take it from there.

Be prepared to pay any fees, seek that the court orders the refund them as part of the relief.

Do not be sidetracked by targeting the bailiff. As long as you get the relief you should not concern yourself with whether its the council or the bailiff, leave that to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for your reply, but I don't think providing a lot of that on a public forum would be a good idea as it would enable Bailiff to identify the case

 

No fees have been charged

 

Tomtubby is an expert on bailiffs and wouldn't ask unless it was necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomtubby is an expert on bailiffs and wouldn't ask unless it was necessary.

 

I don't doubt it and reading through all this his advice does seem excellent, but am still not sure it is a good idea to post sufficient details on a public forum to enable the case to be identified by the Bailiffs themselves. They do read these forums (they would be mad not to!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We know they read the forums, but they won't gain any advantage from doing so especially naming the bailiff company.

 

If they should identify you, (and I think there is probably already enough info to do so), they might rush around and release the clamp, but I doubt it, they just don't care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

larcy, if you do not wish to post the information on a public forum, do you want to private message it to me and I can pass it on to TT for you ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose you could argue that it is trespass to goods but I'm unsure what damages are recoverable from that. For any claim you will have to prove a loss.

 

It will really depend on what information you have provided to the bailiff. If at this stage you have not provided the documentary evidence for him to see then he may be within his rights to leave the vehicle clamped until ownership is proved.

 

Is the car registered in your name but bought by the Ltd company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Larcy,

 

There is no need for you to provide the name of the bailiff company or the local authority but it would be helpful if you could provide some further information about the vehicle. For instance, has the car always been owned by a Limited Company or had it previously been owned by you personally?

 

Given that the the local authority are wholly responsible for the levy and fees charged by their agents, have you provided the LA with sufficient evidence to prove that the vehicle is owned by a Limited Company and should therefore not be levied upon ( for a debt that is personal).

 

If you can provide some further details this would assist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...