Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everybodyl,

 

First time poster here (although i have been keeping my eye on various posts for a few weeks now) so forgive meifi i am the wrong section.

 

I am currently employed but off work with doctors 'fit' notes as i have been struggling with a lower back problem or over 2 years now (25 years old :|)

 

I recently was told i was entitled to ESA (assessment phase) and it would be paid from 28.06.13.

 

This was the not the date i gave when i put my telephone claim in on 01.07.13. I rang fairly late on the day and the Welsh lady on the other end was speaking at 100 mph and seemed to rush me and in all o this the dates have been mixed up.

 

When i received my package with the questions and answers i'd given on the phone the dates were incorrect as mentioned above so i phoned them up and the lady said she had 'added the notes' of the new dates i wished to claim from.

 

It now turns out that these 'notes' are nowhere to be found on the 'system' and i have been told today to go to my nearest Job Center to get a 'backdated claim form' and send it of with a letter explaining why i am backdating to my processing office (Preston) to pursue my backdated payments.

 

My last day worked was 24.05.13 and my first doctors 'fit' note was dated 28.05.13 and my processing office has all 3 fit notes including the first one mentioned above as i sent them all off as part of the evidence they needed along with SSP1 form.

 

Now, the reason i claimed on the 01.07.13 even though i last worked the 24.05.13 was because at the start of June my employer told me 'there should be no problem with Stat Sick Pay' and being a fool i just took this as gospel and expected to be payed something at the end of June. I was NOT and i had not received an SSP1 form from my employer which i understand is to be sent to an employee within 7 days (i may be wrong). My company basically left it to me to realise i had been paid 0.00 for the month of June and also let it to me to chase a SSP1 form which they then sent to me but had not signed it (they literally ticked the box that said i was not entitled to SSP as i had not earned enough in the tax year)

 

Eventually i got it signed and dated on 08.07.13 and sent it off with the fit notes mentioned above.

 

So my question is this... Will i be chasing my tail in trying to get this backdated or in your judgement do i have a reasonable case for backdated ESA?

 

I am slightly annoyed that the lady i spoke to last week took the new claim dates and 'added them to the system' only to be told today i need a separate form which i shall get tomorrow and send of with a letter explaining the previous paragraph and the whole trouble of obtaining my SSP1 form from my employer which i was told was compulsory to the claim when initially making it.

 

 

Sorry for waffling on but i didn't want to miss any details/dates and i am just after a bit of guidance as to i i have a case or not and if getting a backdated claim form from my local Job Center is the correct path to take.

 

 

Thanks for reading/replying

 

Regards,

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

:AdamManc88:

 

Hmm...... Not saying there isn't a separate claim form for backdated payments of employment n support but I've yet to see one, despite having applied for several. I'd double check with your benefit centre (number on your award letter) before chasing off down the jobcentre. And you've reminded me of why I hate telephone claims. The paper ESA1 claim form specifically asks whether one's applying for a claim to be backdated.

 

In my opinion you have a reasonable case for your claim to be backdated. The usual criteria are entitlement from the date claimed and good cause, which includes Jobcentreplus errors, for not claiming sooner. From this point, I'd put the whole saga into a letter and send it recorded delivery (with or without a 'backdated claim form') to your benefit centre. Calls to Jobcentreplus contact centres are recorded and if necessary transcripts can be obtained via subject access.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

SSP has nothing to do with tax year earnings, but with what your average weekly wage is - are you sure this has been calculated correctly?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & thanks or the replies.

 

Yes my SSP was in relation to average weekly wage as opposed to tax year earning i got mixed up sorry.

 

I did what Margaret suggested and phoned ESA back up and the man i spoke to told me that backdated claim forms only relate to JSA and not ESA so he confirmed what Margaret suggested which was to write a letter explaining my reason for requesting a backdating on my ESA (as explained in OP) and posted it off First Class recorded this aftternoon so just a case of waiting now.

 

Just another quick question....

 

My current fit note expires on 23/07/13 (a week today) and i know this causes problems with continued payments of ESA as my doctor will not issue one in advance and it may be around the 24th/25th that it will arrive via post at my benefit office (Preston) if i collect it on the 23rd dated for the 23rd. Do they understand that continued fit notes cannot be obtained in advance and there will be a gap o a ew days where they do not have the current fitnote needed? Im just worried it will affect my ESA

 

Thanks

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Just a quick question.

 

I have just received a letter stating that my current it note expires next Monday 22nd and they expect the new one on Tuesday 23rd. Now i wont see my GP until Tuesday 23rd as he i know fit notes cannot be dated in advance so how the hell can i get it there on the same day as it may cause 'stopping or suspension of payments)

 

How do i go about this?

 

Surely they understand this is impossible to do as the fit note will be dated 23rd when i collect it on the 23rd and it may take a ew days or them to get it.

 

The pre paid return envelope (2nd class) included also says on it not to affix any other postage stamps? Im not sure if is ok for me to affix a 1st class recorded stamp on this? I did last time and it got there within 2 days.

 

Ideas?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pre paid return envelope (2nd class) included also says on it not to affix any other postage stamps? Im not sure if is ok for me to affix a 1st class recorded stamp on this? I did last time and it got there within 2 days.

 

10p to upgrade it to 1st class and a free proof of postage certificate from the post office job done.

 

Call 7-10 days later the ESA helpline to check receipt.

 

Never heard of the DWP over ruling general postage rules (that since they are not the post office and have no say in the matter) or stating such on an envelope?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any ideas how i get around the dates? They have asked for the new fit note to be sent in for Tuesday 23rd but i won't actually see my GP until Tuesday 23rd as he will not date it in advance and it may take a few days to get to them...

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

:AdamManc88:

 

Worst case scenario here is that your next payment may be a few days late. Your current Med 3 (unfit) note runs out on 22 July so the computer will withhold further payments until it's fed a new one. Soon as that happens you'll receive any outstanding payment, and the next payment as normal. Payment of your claim may be delayed, but the claim won't be suspended or closed.

 

For future reference, (unfit) notes can't be post dated but, when necessary, they can be backdated. And from a Jobcentreplus view, overlapping notes aren't a problem either. Also, there's nothing in the regs to prevent a doctor writing a new (unfit) note before a previous one runs out.

 

Think 'not to affix any other postage stamps' means you don't need to. Whether you choose to is an entirely separate issue. Certificate of posting is free. £1.10 gets you confirmation of delivery, but not always an individual signature cos benefit centres usually receive mail in bulk.

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall try get in to see my GP on Monday the 22nd and see i he can issue it a day early with the date o 23rd so i can get it posted off asap. In regards to posting, i have ready on many posts here at CAG forms that DWP have a great knack for 'not receiving' documents so i am covering all bases by going recorded.

 

Thanks or your help Margaret on both this post and a previous one, much appreciated

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall try get in to see my GP on Monday the 22nd and see i he can issue it a day early with the date o 23rd so i can get it posted off asap. In regards to posting, i have ready on many posts here at CAG forms that DWP have a great knack for 'not receiving' documents so i am covering all bases by going recorded.

 

Thanks or your help Margaret on both this post and a previous one, much appreciated

 

Adam

 

By all means use recorded, but I have to say this - please don't fall victim to "DWP paranoia". They're not out to get you, and in fact, DWP staffers would rather pay your benefits than spend time on the phone explaining why they won't pay you. Think about it:

 

DWP Staff: I can issue a payment today, either to your bank or to a local Jobcentre.

 

Vs

 

DWP Staff: Sorry, I can't pay you.

 

See, dealing with the second situation is a pain in the ass.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to organise. Use a calendar or a diary and make a note of when your med cert runs out. Two or even three weeks beforehand get another one issued. It doesn't matter if they overlap. You cannot rely on the DWP to remind you - as you've just found out. No med cert = no payment. Make this a priority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

it seems i'm chasing my tail with DWP....

 

the date i wished to claim from was put in for 28/6 on the system when i told the lady

when making the claim 28/5 and they have medical notes covering this date...

 

I was told 2 weeks ago when first chasing it up to go to my local job center

and get a 'backdated claim form' which when arriving at my job center was told this form was only for JSA and not ESA.

 

Rang the following day to be told 'write a letter explaining why you wish to backdate' which i did.

A 2 page letter covering all the dates and reasons, posted it 1st class recorded.

 

I heard nothing or over a week then rang them last Thursday to be told

'we can see everything on our system and i PROMISE a decision maker will call you between 9am and 1pm tomorrow (Friday)

- Of course this didn't happen.

 

Received a voice mail today (Monday 29th) saying they apologise but they have

'deleted something from the system' and i have been posted an ssp1 for in post in order to backdate.

 

there is a form after being told there is, then there isn't, and now apparently there is.

Isn't the ssp1 form the big huge initial claim form?

Am i going to have to fill all this out again?

 

It seems i'm chasing my tail all the time with DWP.

 

They are quick to tell me i need a new fit-note,

need to do my atos forms,

to wait in for a call that doesn't arrive...

 

. but due to human error on their part

i know have to make many phone calls and fill even more form in.

 

Do they want me to just give up on getting the 4 weeks im owed backdated?

 

So angry right now so apologies if it came across in my post.

 

They are all on different wavelengths and this is in no way efficient to the claimant.

 

So i have to fill in an ssp1 again?

 

Advice appreciated,

 

Thanks

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

:AdamManc88:

 

Either Jobcentreplus have lost your SSP1 form (statutory sick pay) or, from your previous posts, it's possible that the one you sent wasn't completed correctly. Whatever the reason, you're going to have to chase your employer to complete another form.

 

If you've the technology, there's a downloadable and printable copy at;

 

http://www.gov.uk/statutory-sick-pay/eligibility

 

So far as I know there isn't a separate from to apply for backdated employment n support allowance. The 'big huge initial claim form' is the ESA1 for paper claims as opposed to telephone claims. For reference there's an example at;

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/esa1-print.pdf

 

My personal preference is an old fashioned paper claim form in a envelope with the SSP1, proof of income, etcetera. Unfortunately Government don't agree with me!!

 

If you've received an ESA50 form to complete there's a guide to the first part at;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?316210-ESA50-Guide

 

And if you need a guide to the mental health part, there's one on Rethink's site.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...