Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay side with buyer 5 weeks after sold item?! it was brand new!! Help!


kevvyast
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have recently sold a new galaxy S4 on ebay then after 5 weeks the buyer as opened an item not as described case. The buyer left positive feedback saying the Good & genuine product good service.

 

I spoke to the buyer trying resolve this and quite clearly stated in those messages I am not prepared to give a refund as this was brand new and worked perfectly. The buyers problem is that apparently it as now got problems getting a signal which it didn't have until 5 weeks after?!?! I have offered to ring the shop I got it from to see if it would be repaired if this was the case but never heard anything back for 9 days.

 

I then after speaking to ebay support I escalated the case as there had been no contact from the buyer and being assured that the case would go in my favour as it was accurately described and genuine product and the description also stated no returns accepted.

 

2 days later I get a final decision siding with the buyer and Ive got to give them a full refund!!! How can this be??? I'm now going to end up with a used damaged phone if its even the same one and have to give a full refund for a brand new phone that obviously in the 7 weeks that's gone past now isn't worth as much anyway and is used.

 

It seems to me that Ive been ripped off and cant do anything about it? its one way of getting a mobile phone for rent free for 2 months!

 

Is there anything I can do? cos to be honest I don't have the money now so I assume they are going to take it straight out of my bank account. Surely this cant be right!! Ive done nothing wrong but look like I going to be £500 out of pocket for selling something brand new and working

 

please somebody advise :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only ask that the Phone be returned to you so at the very least you have this back. Unfortunately if the phone has developed a fault then its the sellers responsibility to put it right. The contract is between you and the customer and the manufacturer has nothing to do with this. Upon receipt of the phone if there are issues you can take it up directly with whomever you got the phone from.

 

The buyer may be genuine in his case with the signal, Its actually a well known problem with the S4. At the end of the day, we have all had a product that has not lived up to expectations and it can take weeks, sometimes months to notice these faults.

 

In respect of taking the money back, they will have no doubt ask the buyer to return the phone by recorded delivery. Upon receipt of the delivery confirmation from the Buyer they will issue them for a refund from their own coffers and then deduct this amount from your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

How can this be my responsibility when they have had this for 5 weeks and could of dropped it or anything? I don't understand, that's like saying if they bought a car privately and something went wrong they could take it back and get a refund.

 

Basically means that I sold a phone that worked perfectly and was brand new for someone else to break it and I have to pay. how does that make sense either when states no returns. Sorry cant get my head around how that can be right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately if the phone has developed a fault then its the sellers responsibility to put it right. The contract is between you and the customer and the manufacturer has nothing to do with this.

 

Not if its a private seller. Most of the Sale of Goods Act applies only where the seller sells goods in the course of a business

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if its a private seller. Most of the Sale of Goods Act applies only where the seller sells goods in the course of a business

 

I am a private seller that's why I cant understand

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just rang ebay and spoke to a representative and they have said they will not being taking a refund after reviewing the case. he said he will be sending me confirmation shortly and don't know if have been fobbed off to be honest. Think I should of waited whilst on the phone to receive the email I did however get his name so do you think Im best to ring back and make sure I have confirmation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just rang ebay and spoke to a representative...

 

You did record the call, didn't you ? As has been said on this forum countless times, invest in a call recorder of some sort and you wont have to worry about things like this. Then there is no need for confirmation emails, just keep the recording on your computer in case it is needed in the future. In case they did take the money back from your bank account, you can use the direct debit indemnity, and if the bank require proof, you have the recording!

 

If you don't get a confirmation email in 24hrs, ring them back and ask for it to be sent again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no I didn't record it which in hindsight is stupid of grrrr, not had any mail from them so will ring in the morning again and prob get a different answer now. Kicking myself big time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you are responsible, buyers can open a SNAD dispute and receive a refund upto 45 days after the sale date.

 

 

I take it you got though to a foreign call centre? Ebays Manilla call centre staff are a joke that’s not even funny.

 

They often, if not always give out misleading or totally wrong information. They told you the case would be found in your favour when 99.99% of the time SNAD disputes are always found in the buyers favour. They’ll say anything to get you off the phone. Phone back and try to get the Dublin call centre, its totally random but phoning early morning usually helps. They’re actually very helpful.

 

 

On the plus side, if they don’t send it back tracked you don’t have to refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I understan your anger as this has happened to me.

 

Make sure you have NO reinbursement payment method on ebay file, this is in the financial section of the account tab, also make sure you have no balance in paypal.

 

I cancelled my card also and they coudnlt take a penny.

 

You are well in the right the buyer has left positive feedback and the signal issues are surely not your fault.

 

This is technically theft.

 

The buyer shouldnt be able to file any cases after 45 days of recieving the item, ebay have acted wrongly but sadly they always side with the buyers.

 

Even if you request the item back it has been known for people to send bk an empty box with travking and with that fleebay are satisfised it has been returned, sadly not the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a law unto themselves if people dont get complaining and reporting. Or even go as far as taking legal action against them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would cost mega bucks!!

 

DOnt see how since you can do it through small claims court.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would you complain too or report to?

 

Iv complained to them myself but they dont take any notice.

 

Complain to the regulators and Trading standards. If enough people do it, theyll be forced to take action.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont believe this cos Im still pinching myself!!!!

 

I rang ebay again today and got through to them and recorded the phone call in case they repeated what they had already told me. They stated that because the item was high value it had to be approved by management which takes 24-48hrs! So I thought he we go Im being fobbed off again and to wait for so called email.

I have just received this

 

A case has been opened because the buyer has an issue with an item purchased from you. We've reviewed the case and have decided to issue the buyer with a full refund of £521.50. The refund includes the purchase price plus original postage & packaging. The hold on this PayPal transaction has been removed.

 This case is now closed. You aren't required to reimburse the buyer or eBay, and this case will not be counted in your seller performance evaluation.

 

You can view the details of the case in the Resolution Centre.

 

SO! they basically saying cant be arsed heres his refund and keep the phone and nothings changed talk about unbelievable! I am elated to not have to give a refund myself but how do people get away with this?!?! its just wrong hes now sitting there laughing for getting a full refund and a brand new phone for free

 

Im not knocking it but how do they come to this decision?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats ebay for you, and its why they NEED to be reported. Also remember that they seem to have disregard for regulation and law. I mean look at their tax avoidance policy.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is part of their ebay buyer protection scheme. when the buyer claims a fault, but not fair to penalise the seller! sort of insurance. to get people to use ebay!

Don't knock it. They do not do it if they fraud is apparent, its just an arbitrary decision.

good result for you anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...