Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work Programme results(sic)


Mr.P
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ERSA have recently (20th June) published a report highlighting their success in getting the long term unemployed back in to work. Headline claim is 321,000 people starting work. Further on, the report also claims that:

there have been a further 92,000 subsequent Job Starts across those 321,000 individuals. This means that a total of 413,000 jobs have been filled by participants on the Work Programme between June 2011 and the end of March 2013.
If the providers can only find temporary contracts that last anything from a single day to three months, might as well spin it... Job starts do not equate to sustained employment, nor should people hounded off benefits through sanctions or intimidation be counted.

 

Comparing their figures with the last official report from the DWP wp_release_nov12.pdf, I am really struggling to see any correlation between the two - It will be interesting to see what the DWP has to say on 27th June. If the ERSA figures are to be believed, that means the providers are in line for some £1,250M for their efforts to date (using a £4,000 per participant figure based on Work & Pensions Committee figures).

 

Before either party decide to remove their documents, I'll attach them below (they have, after all, been placed in the public domain).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That report seriously spins their numbers, which show that performance has been DECREASING, not increasing by these providers.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it doesn't matter. The government will give or remove contracts according to how they will help funding their parties and help their careers after politics rather than merit.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it doesn't matter. The government will give or remove contracts according to how they will help funding their parties and help their careers after politics rather than merit.

 

But then isn't that the case for almost everyone today? There is only one person that you can seriously rely on to look after best interests - yourself!

 

I used to work with a young lady (I helped train her and teach her to get a qualification). Since then and since my retirement, that young lady has looked after number 1 and has done everything possible to get up the ladder. I spent hours and hours with her, mostly in my own free time after work and at lunchtimes. All of that is fine, but what upsets me is when I read about her on LinkedIn she makes it quite clear that she has done everything herself with no help from others - a self made woman. Funny really especially when she started she asked if she needed to put an air mail sticker on a letter that was going from London to Wales!

 

She reminds me of the many MPs/Ministers that I have had the displeasure to talk to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too right. At one time in my naive youth, I'd suggest ways to improve the organisation and be genuinely looking to make the place better, but I soon got rid of that notion - any good ideas staff come up with will, in most cases, suddenly become the boss's new idea.

 

It's nice to ty and help people but eventually you just get worn down and simply stop. As for figures, the transport company I used to work for always claimed '100% of our buses are running'. This was true - but only because they classed a bus as 'running' if it left the depot. If it broke down 2 seconds later this wasn't counted.

 

It ain't what you write, it's what you leave out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I discovered a long time ago that 'going the extra mile' meant that I would wear out faster and be replaced quicker. Bosses that really appreciate initiative and reward it, are rare animals near extinction.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached, the "official" results from the DWP. As expected, they have fudged the numbers by covering the full two years and contradicted the ERSA numbers.

 

Over the last two years, some 1.16 million attachments have been made and just 131,920 Job Outcome payments have been made - These are the payments the provider receives when a claimant starts work. Sustainment payments are staged and repeat payments for those (now working) claimants that remain "Off Benefits". So what do these payment figures tell us ?

ERSA claim 321,000 job starts, payments suggest ~132,000 - A big difference. This equates to an 11% success rate, and falls well short of expectations. This may also explain why the WP providers are bleating about insufficient funding and are trying to wrangle more money out of the gravy train.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the success of this scheme should be judged against what jobs this group of people would get without any input from the Work Programme?.

The success of the scheme depends on how much the contractors (Atos, G4s, Ingeus, Remploy) will donate into the ruling parties or affiliated charitable foundations, either here or in the Isle of Man.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

But then isn't that the case for almost everyone today? There is only one person that you can seriously rely on to look after best interests - yourself!

 

I used to work with a young lady (I helped train her and teach her to get a qualification). Since then and since my retirement, that young lady has looked after number 1 and has done everything possible to get up the ladder. I spent hours and hours with her, mostly in my own free time after work and at lunchtimes. All of that is fine, but what upsets me is when I read about her on LinkedIn she makes it quite clear that she has done everything herself with no help from others - a self made woman. Funny really especially when she started she asked if she needed to put an air mail sticker on a letter that was going from London to Wales!

 

She reminds me of the many MPs/Ministers that I have had the displeasure to talk to.

If you are a Professional, Qualified Teacher within this the Secondary School System (or FE/HE), and truly helped the individual, then you have cause to feel agrieved.... however, if conversely, you were simply a Welfare To Work Clerk, could not get a job within a Call Centre, with lucky enough to get a job within the Welfare To Work Sector (selling your soul in the process), and proceeded to "offer help" through (for example) the New Deal, Flexible New Deal or Work Programme, then this type of "help" does not really count, in the scheme of things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...