Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interest added by Cabot After Card debt sale - Is that Correct?


tedney
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

From research on other threads, I have understood that DCA's should not add interest to a debt. Is this correct:?:.

 

I had a credit card account which was defaulted and then closed (by the creditor).

 

I have been paying regular monthly payments to the original creditor,

and most of these have been recorded and are shown on copy statements that I received following an SAR.

 

The account was "charged off" by the OC and at that point and further interest was not added by the OC after that.

 

The account was then marked "Debt Sale" on the copy statements, and then a DCA started to add interest, despite my monthly payments continuing.

 

I have received no statements from the DCA, but my file on the CRA's show the sum owed as increasing.

The account does not show on the CRA anymore, as it is over 6 years old now.

 

I have the original agreement, but cannot find any reference to "transferring" the right to charge interest,

or for that matter any other aspect of the account, to a third party.

 

Where should I be looking:?: Is there a part of an act I can quote regarding "unlawful" interest please. Any help welcome. Thanks t :???:

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that interest cannot be added to the debt after it has been defaulted and terminated by the original creditor.

 

What this would amount to would be a charge for debt collection and again it is my understanding that it is not permitted.

 

On what basis is the new owner adding interest ?

 

Can you let us know which DCA this is? If you are concerned about posting the name on the public forum, you can private message it to me.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

not link is it!!

 

they cannot charge interest 

 

however

 

tell more about the debt please

 

and name names

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not Link!

 

Prefer not to give out too much info,

 

I have PM'd citizenB.

 

After a few years, DCA is chasing again now, so do not want identify.

 

Incidentally, an original agreement has not been supplied by DCA, as when I CCA'd the OC,

I got a letter from another OC who would have had no involvement with the running of the account when it was open!

 

I have the terms and conditions supplied when I opened the account, but not a signed agreement.

 

Should I ask for one again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no need for secret squirrel

 

yes cca the chaser.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i myself am looking into this as i am unsure,

 

If the account has been terminated by the original creditor, then assigned to a debt agency, i cannot see how they can charge post termination contractual interest. The rights might have been assigned to collect the outstanding balance, but not contractual interest as the agreement is terminated

 

We will then have the case if it was applicable for them to claim interest etc, they would have to send a notice of default sums to the debtor to be effectual to claim default sums if they are now the creditor by assignment

 

If the account was assigned as live, that is not terminated, then their will be no question that they can charge interest.

 

The only other avenue to explore would be if the original contract allowed the debt agency to charge post contractual interest

 

This is just my educated opinion and based on no supporting evidence, and is totally subjective in my reasoning

Edited by squaddie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Account certainly defaulted, and certainly closed by OC, I have that in writing.

 

Usual ignoring of correspondence by OC,

then I started monthly payments, as set out by CAB.

 

When this happened, I subsequently found out, (copy statements were sent nearly three years later) the account was marked "charged off",

and no interest added by OC from this time (charged off).

 

Payments to OC were continued, no statements forthcoming from anyone,

but subsequently (as above) payments recorded as received until one year later,

when copy statement from OC shows "Debt Sale".

 

No statements from anyone since, payments to OC continued, occassional letters from DCA with oustanding balance increasing,

and CRA's reporting increase, as well as monthly payments (of course less than sums addedd by DCA).

 

No correspondence from DCA since 2009, until now, when outstanding balance shown has increased about 50% over original sum,

this in six and half years since DN.

 

Monthly payments were accepted by the OC until about two years ago, when, without any correspondence or advice,

they are regularly returned by the bank!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you retained the notices of the payments being returned ? Those would be very useful in proving that you have indeed been paying, they just aren't accepting those payments.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, clearly shown on my bank statements, date and time and amount of payment, and corresponding amount shown as a credit from "suspense account" approx. two weeks later! This happens every month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you obtained a copy of the agreement?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember people

 

Just because an agreement has been terminated by the original creditor, the rights to collect any outstanding balance still remain

 

Only a court or the creditor can end the agreement

 

It is just the rights to claim interest post assignment that i am debating. This is by a new creditor under assignment on a terminated agreement under contract

 

If a claim is issued in the civil court, a creditor can claim 8% statutory interest up to judgement from the time the claim was issued, and post judgement if the court allows

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you obtained a copy of the agreement?

 

No, I sent a CCA section 78 request to OC last year,

got a response from another creditor,

quoting an alien account number,

and also had name and address issues with their response and

saying they destroyed my cheque (I sent a postal order - not cashed) quote

 

 

" As the details you provided do not match the details on our records, we are currently unable to respond".

 

 

needless to say I queried this and got an identical letter back.

 

 

I have not sent CCA to DCA though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I,very just had a letter from Cxxxx today saying that if I don,t make payments they will add interest...this is a very old Cities debt I,all be interested to see if they can do this

I have been making payments, and they are still adding interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They tried these threats a few years back, and came unstuck I think, the interest I don't think is allowed unless the original agreement specifically allows it.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, where might it be shown on the original please?

I have looked (I have "original" signed application) but cannot find any references to what happens in the event of default/closed as confirmed by OC

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have not been receiving regular statements, is this in breach of the CC Act?

I have sent of request see post 13 above. Will wait and see. Seems to me I should stop payments:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have not been receiving regular statments, is this in breach of the CC Act?

 

Yes statement should be supplied at least annually.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought, OC stopped interest after DN, I have copy statements, these statements also show payments in, reducing balances. Does this help in "fighting" interest added by DCA? Statements from OC stopped when account assigned to DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...