Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work Programme soon, HELP!


BiteMe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi..

 

Jobcenter are about to put me on Work Programme. I have heard nothing but bad things about this.

 

Over the past few months I have been looking for jobs that I think I could do ( I have really severe ADHD and cannot do something mundane like sit on a till all day, I would pull my hair out) I am an actor, but aside for applying for lots of acting jobs I also look for other things, as long as they are not till based.

 

Anyway, I am about to go on the work programme, and I have already seen the general rules ( I won't sign anything etc etc) I am also not happy to be shoved around the system by a private company, but I digress.

 

I am also going self employed very soon. The money I need to set up my business is very little, and as such there would be no point in me looking for a full time job anymore like the work programme will invetibly attempt to hassle me in to doing.

 

I am asking if anyone can lend any advice to keep off of this. Reasrch I have done shows that it may be unlwaful anyway? I have also read that JC can keep you with them for an extra 90 days if you are about to become employed? Any help would be appreciated, because I am damned if my ambition will be channeled into free labour for poundland!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the mandation letter letter use the phrase "you most do what ever the provider tells you" or words to that effect - If so, write to the JCP+ seeking clarification and point out that the wording implies that you could be required to undertake illegal and/or immoral activities. Unless the DWP/JCP+ can provide written assurances that clear and unequivocal guidance as to what is expected, you feel it inappropriate to have any contact with the provider in question.

When the provider sends you a letter mandating the initial appointment, respond in writing that you are willing to attend once clarification from the DWP has been received regarding the scope of participation required.

 

Note: This is a high risk strategy that could result in a sanction for failing to attend. Please seek further advice before refusing to attend an appointment "without good cause".

 

The other alternative is to sign off for a couple of weeks (taking an overseas holiday), and then go through a rapid resign. This would delay the process for a few weeks, but may not be an option if funds are limited.

 

As for being stuck with a WP provider for an extra 90 days - Once your JSA claim is closed, which it would be as soon as you signed off, no one can force you to have any further contact with a provider. Indeed, if the provider makes repeated attempts to contact you after signing off, they could be found to be committing criminal offence under the Protection from Harassment Act (along with a few other laws).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. I have not recieved anything just yet. But I will update once I hear from them. What I meant was that the jobcenter will not refer you to a WP for 90 days (at discretion) if you tell them you are to be imminently employed anyway (which is about the only thing that makes any sense) . I do not mind attending if I will recieve useful information about becoming self-empoyed, but I will not be matched to inappropriate jobs, or told to take the first thing that comes along, simply so a private company gets some easy government cash. Which is currently what I feel goes on. I have had issues with the jobcenter before, and won, however I am in unfamiliar territory here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are planning to go self employed then speak to your adviser at the JCP urgently, you may be eligible to be referred to the new enterprise allowance to help finalise your impening self employment.

Once you have been referred to the work program you cannot access that facility.

If you can do that referral to the work program is usually deferred until the outcome of the nea program is completed.

 

https://www.gov.uk/new-enterprise-allowance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, apologies, I got the impression you had already received the letter mandating a WP referral. If you are scheduled to attend a JCP+ to "discuss" a WP placement, there are a couple of things you can try:

 

Talk to the JCP+ adviser asking for a stay of execution and enquire as to what support they can provide or signpost you towards - In my area, we have an enterprise advice centre that might provide support and advice for new start up businesses. Explain to the JCP+ adviser that you have ideas/plans that would be better served by local expert organisations rather than a "lowest common denominator" WP provider that has yet to demonstrate an ability to provide quality tailored & personalised support. Follow up on flumps' advice asap, even if it means phoning (or visiting) your local JCP+ office on Monday and before considering any short term sign off periods - I suspect any short breaks in your claim over the last year would invalidate some aspects of NEA support but would be ignored for the purpose of a WP referral.

 

Second option is to serve a DPA notice (in writing) withdrawing consent for the DWP/JCP+ to share personal or confidential information with any third party or subcontractor - It won't stop them from passing on your contact details, but it may delay them for a few days while they work out a way to weasel around any objections you may have.

 

Last time I had one of these referrals heading my way, I signed off a couple of days before the appointment was scheduled (three weeks as an xmas casual). On renewing my claim, it took them a couple of months to push the buttons and get me consigned to the clutches of Emma's little harpies.

Edited by Mr.P

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not mind attending if I will recieve useful information about becoming self-empoyed

 

I've been on the WP for almost the full 2 years now and I've never learned anything new, relevant or useful from them - about anything. Complete and utter waste of time, though to be fair I've already got 35+ years work experience, which is more than the WP advisors have, so I didn't really expect to get any benefit from it. They are the only beneficiaries of my presence there; a £400 attachment fee they get paid plus whatever commision they were paid for sending me on a pointless course I was already grossly over-qualified for.

 

I hope you can escape the WP totally, I wouldn't want anyone there for even one day. Best of luck with your business..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, apologies, I got the impression you had already received the letter mandating a WP referral. If you are scheduled to attend a JCP+ to "discuss" a WP placement, there are a couple of things you can try:

 

Talk to the JCP+ adviser asking for a stay of execution and enquire as to what support they can provide or signpost you towards - In my area, we have an enterprise advice centre that might provide support and advice for new start up businesses. Explain to the JCP+ adviser that you have ideas/plans that would be better served by local expert organisations rather than a "lowest common denominator" WP provider that has yet to demonstrate an ability to provide quality tailored & personalised support. Follow up on flumps' advice asap, even if it means phoning (or visiting) your local JCP+ office on Monday and before considering any short term sign off periods - I suspect any short breaks in your claim over the last year would invalidate some aspects of NEA support but would be ignored for the purpose of a WP referral.

 

Second option is to serve a DPA notice (in writing) withdrawing consent for the DWP/JCP+ to share personal or confidential information with any third party or subcontractor - It won't stop them from passing on your contact details, but it may delay them for a few days while they work out a way to weasel around any objections you may have.

 

Last time I had one of these referrals heading my way, I signed off a couple of days before the appointment was scheduled (three weeks as an xmas casual). On renewing my claim, it took them a couple of months to push the buttons and get me consigned to the clutches of Emma's little harpies.

 

 

OK, I will do all the things above. I am not very familiar with the site, and although I do try and do things myself I can't find anything about a DPA notice! Is there a template somewhere? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs

 

I hereby give notice that consent, either implied or explicit, to share personal or confidential information with any third party is withdrawn. Should you wish to share information about myself with a third party or subcontractor, then informed written consent shall be required regardless of the point that the DWP/JCP+ may remain the data controller.

 

Yours, [insert name]

 

If you have had this misfortune to register on the UJM site, it would be prudent to remove any/all personal information and untick the "share with adviser" box.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A dumb question, but who do I send that to?

 

And, no I have not registered with UJM. Despite my adviser asking me on numerous occasions. Fortunatley I have a very nice adviser, who isn't aggresive about it, a second reason I don't want to go on this is because they will no doubt send me on to some bitter pencil-pusher who I will come to blows with, as I did last time, when another adviser asked me why I didn't look for jobs on Christmas Day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a copy to your local JCP office, print a few extra copies off and hand one to the line manager next time you go to sign on. Further copies can/should be presented to your adviser and/or who ever does the "we're going to refer you to [pimp]" interview.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...