Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Should I quit or wait to get fired?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I started a new job about 4/5 weeks ago but it isn't going well. Its very timed and speed focused and I just CANT get to the speed they want/need their employees to achieve. Other trainees are managing this. I can't see how I can improve myself anymore (it's a physical job and I get the feeling that my previous 5 year desk job hasn't aided me in moving to this kind of situation) so feel like dismissal is going to be inevitable.

 

What I'd like to get an opinion of is whether I should quit or should I wait to be dismissed. I'm very tempted to 'just' quit as it's really stressing me out constantly worrying about time targets and if I'm getting it wrong, and why I'm so bad etc, and dreading the next day at work.

 

Money isn't a (major) issue as my husbands wage is supporting us adequately at the moment, but I would be looking to go back on JSA(Contribution) and also need to consider how it would look on my CV in the future. Is it better to look like I took responsibility myself and quit a job before they had to fire me, or to let them fire me and let future employers know?

 

Thanks in advance

StageD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Generally the advice here is not to quit, but I can see it might be different for you. The guys should be along later.

 

Can I ask if there is any threat of disciplinary action at the moment please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, no threat of Disciplinary at all, I'm still in a 3 month training period. I simply cannot reach the level of speed they require me to be at for this far into my training, and the manager has said to me in the last couple of days if there's no improvement then they'll have to let me go. I know my own 'limitations' though and don't feel that I can reach their speed targets in and reasonable amount of time :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm sorry it isn't working out - no one's fault, sometimes there just isn't a match.

 

if you want to claim JSA I think you would be facing a sanction by resigning. You may also face a sanction by being dismissed, it depends what the reason they give is.

 

Are they friendly enough that you could have a conversation abput aybe ending your probation for another reason?

 

I'd also check with the benefits guys about the impact of a break in unemployment on your JSA. How long were you claiming for before?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Emmzzi, like you say, sometimes things just don't work out and noone is to blame. I did think that resigning would potentially cause issues, but I didn't realise that if they sacked me it could too. That's worrying.

 

They are friendly, though I've had little chance to form any friendly relationships as I've been so focused on trying harder, and the Manager was unfortunately not there for about 2/3 weeks so I had little chance to get a sense of their temperament though it does seem friendly, when I'm not panicking about how they'll react to things. If I was to go this route though what 'other reason' might be acceptable? Would not being suitable for a job not be? (acceptable that is)

 

I was claiming JSA for almost exactly 3 months (give or take a couple of days) on Contribution based so have another 3 months I believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would check that with someone who knows more about benefits than me. If I had an employee in your position who asked about a "mutual parting of the ways" I'd be happy to dismiss them for "not working out" versus "performance issues" and when DWP asked say they tried really hard! Ultimately the JC decide but you can improve your chances.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think five weeks is enough time. If the training period is three months the employer must think it takes three months for new starters to get up to speed. Right now other trainees might be doing better than you but there is nothing wrong with being a late developer. I would do your best and stick it out for the three months. If you still feel like this at the end of the training period then you have more information to reach a proper decision. Management are unlikely to just sack you out of the blue, especially if you are still a trainee, it is more likely they would approach you informally to explain their concerns or perhaps hold a formal meeting to discuss your performance.

 

If you are genuinely sure this will not work out then of course start looking for other jobs. However I would stay in this job for now. I do not think it looks good on the CV to quit a job after only a few weeks (indeed I would probably leave a very short job off the CV), sticking it out for the full training period would be a better story to tell future employers.

 

I have sympathy. I was pretty rubbish at my job for the first few months when I was a trainee. I would often make really stupid mistakes which had to be corrected by more senior members of staff. Fast forward six months and I was a good performer, fast forward a few years and I think I am one of the best performers. I have been at the same employer the whole time.

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I am no expert on benefits, but I thought that if you voluntarily leave a job you cannot claim the full amount of JSA? Do check this before making any rash decisions.

Edited by steampowered

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree with you Steampowered, 5 weeks in a 3 month training? 'You're in training, of course you're going to need all that time to get up to speed'. I've been telling myself this for weeks (I've obviously been worrying for a while) but it's not a case of I've got no basis for my worries, the Manager has said to me both today and yesterday that I have to speed up or they wont be able to keep me. I'd love to think I could stick it out the whole 3 months, but that just isn't the case. It's not out of the blue so much as I've had two 'warnings' about it already.

 

As for the benefits side there are some circumstances where they will let you (such as moving across the country as I did in November), although I think you have to be eligible for Contribution based, but that might be wrong and you can get Income Based if needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should speak to your manager or HR also have a word with your jobcentre, you said that money wasnt a major issue at the moment so if you are sanctioned for a while could you manage? just to say I do disagree with a couple of posters in that if you are not up to speed and your manager has already said that he has concerns, maybe this isnt the job for you and you would be better to go now rather than waste their time and your time in continuing in somthing that dosnt look like it is going to work. If you go the company may be able to offer your job to someone more suited.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Assisted Blonde, if I were sanctioned for a while... it would depend on how long. Short term it would be fine, we could last a month on our current money situation if my husbands work dried up, he's been working for a company through an agency atm with a big promise of a full job at the end of it, however he's heard today his hours may get cut shortly and we're a bit in limbo because of it now :-\ (found this out since first posting earlier). But then again, if I get the news in a couple of days that they're going to let me go, its going to be a bit of a moot point, I'll have to deal with whatever happens :)

 

I feel the same way as you in that I want to stop wasting their time (and mine tbh) and, like you say, they can start training someone else more suitable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea how long sanctions last but it might be an idea to ring the job centre and ask the question that if you are not able to do the job and have to leave/get sacked what will happen

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is always that if you don't like the job the honest thing is to quit and face the consequences, rather than pushing your employer to get rid of you.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most of the advice given here is sound, so I can't really add much further. I suppose the ideal solution would be to find another job prior to leaving this one, that would probably be the best option.

 

Other than that, I think dialogue is important. Speak to the manager and ask if there is any training available which would help you to improve, if this is possible (I appreciate this is a case where it might just not be possible for you to do the job) and maybe speak to the job centre to explain your situation, and perhaps let your employer know that you've done this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...