Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I woke up to knocks at the door early in the morning. I opened the window and two men on my drive said they were court Sheriffs and that they had a high court writ. I have made an application to court to have the judgement set aside as i was not correctly served and have not been able to defend myself. I am waiting to hear back on that and also a stay of the writ.

Meanwhile i am expecting the bailiffs to return.

The bailiffs kept telling me that i had to let them in and if i did not the would call a locksmith, this is on their first visit. I spoke to them from a window and told them i would not be letting them in until i had got legal advice. They sat in their car for nearly 2 hours, saying it was going to cost me, until i managed to get through to a solicitor. Whilst on the phone to solicitor they handed me a pink sheet through the window. On there it says that the car on the drive, registered to me and all goods in the demise property.I did put them on notice that although the said car was registered to me it was part of my late mothers estate that i am administrator to and have sent them documents to prove this matter.

Now i would appreciate it if someone could explain is that pink sheet what you call a levy? Does the car have to remain on the drive although the estate solicitors have advised the bailiffs that it is Estate property. Also does that mean all goods in my house are levied although the bailiffs have not been in my house or know what i have her? I never signed anything, pink sheet was handed to me and bailiffs got in their car and left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The levy on items in the house would not be valid, as they would have had to gain access and list items. The levy on the car is debateable.

 

If you can legally use the car on the road, then yes I would say there is nothing to stop you using it and if it is property of an estate, the people responsible for the estate can take it somewhere for safe keeping.

 

What debt is this ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its from an ex landlord claiming i owe him unpaid rent, which i absolutely do not. I moved out of the property April 2012 of which he was fully aware and i have now found out that he went to court without my knowledge in July 2012 and got a possession order and even went to lengths of getting bailiffs to remove me from a property i was not living in. Obviously court papers have gone to the old address and he has got a judgement against me and i have not been aware or been able to defend myself. Do i have to let the bailiffs in on their next visit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its from an ex landlord claiming i owe him unpaid rent, which i absolutely do not. I moved out of the property April 2012 of which he was fully aware and i have now found out that he went to court without my knowledge in July 2012 and got a possession order and even went to lengths of getting bailiffs to remove me from a property i was not living in. Obviously court papers have gone to the old address and he has got a judgement against me and i have not been aware or been able to defend myself. Do i have to let the bailiffs in on their next visit?

No you apply to the court for a setaside, and a stay, the stay is importasnt as it will stop the HCEO, wonkeydonkey, is the best one for this, will pm for you

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually submitted your Set Aside application & also the one for the Stay? Which Court(s) have you submitted them to? Which Form(s) did you use?

 

Is it possible you can scan & post up the paperwork you have been left - best done as a PDF file but remove all personal info? As well as the pink sheet were you given a Form 55?

 

When visiting a residential property the Enforcement Officer can only enter the premises by peaceful means. They CANNOT use a locksmith or force entry. I assume the car belonged to your late mum and it is in your possession for safe keeping?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The HCEOs cannot force entry to a residential property but could force entry to an unattached garage or other building (barn etc). They should not be threatening to use a locksmith to a residential property.

 

To prevent further enforcement action, as stated above, you will need to apply for a stay of execution. If the car levied does not belong to you (the judgment debtor) then a third party claim should be sent to the HCEO in writing for completeness.

 

Unfortunately, these kind of cases are becoming all to prevalent where a landlord sues their ex-tenant for rent but uses an address they know they are not resident at, namely their own rental property. I know of one former enforcement officer (pretending to be a real 'Sheriff' - his words) that actively promoted this at various landlord networking meetings. There were few Youtube videos out there showing this.

 

It only makes our job harder and is often a waste of time, money and effort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEOs nicely put

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...