Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Filling in a ESA50


matt v atos
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi regarding ESA50

 

If I by some miracle im awarded 15 points in the Physical functions sec and lets say 10 in Mental Cognitive and intellectual functions, could Atos disregard Physical functions score of 15 and award only the Mental Cognitive and intellectual functions score,or are the two combined. ive read how the points system works but don't really understand it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They're combined. Also, you have to score 15 overall at least. So, if you score 10 on physical and 5 on mental, you'll pass.

 

However, the new changes mean that if you're just mentally impaired, you can't use physical descriptors and vice versa.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the process of filling in ESA50

 

I have

Unstable angina

Bilateral leg critical ischaemia.

Ischaemic heart disease.

bilateral calf claudicatiun both legs

High haemoglobin levels.

Diabetes

Tumours on side of both feet

Blurred vision

Anxiety Depression

 

Bilateral calf claudication at 10 yards and housebound pain in legs and feet lack of feeling and numbness in feet angina pain in chest GTN spray needed to reduce pain.

breathless dizziness unsteady on feet lower back pain feeling of heaviness shortness of breath after 10 metres. condition does not vary day to day and appears to have worsened over time

Link to post
Share on other sites

2008 Admitted to University Hospital Coventry due to Heart attack surgery to have two stents fitted.

11/07/2011 again Admitted to University Hospital Coventry suffering a Angina attack.

Has had several visit as out patent up to date undergoing Vascular surgery next on 23rd jan 2013.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the new law being sneaked in under the radar by this govt, are changing the wca to where you can only use one part of either the mental or physical functions they will no longer be combined to give an overall score...this was highlighted by Nysgamite in a new thread recently posted...so you will either be assessed under the physical descriptors or under the mental descriptors but not both.....crafty, crafty by this govt...i expect a lot of reassessment being done under this new harsher regime with many more being denied the benefits to which they are truly entitled to....we must protect the most vulnerable of society or we cease to be a civilized country... I work for minimum wage sometimes up to 60 hrs in a week, but would gladly pay extra in order that the more vulnerable in society get what they need....without this help people like myself would not be able to work, I claim DLA and without it, i would be another statistic...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Matt.

 

Leemack did a really good guide about filling in an ESA50 for physical illnesses. Sadly, the second part for mental illnesses is on hold, but I hope the sticky will give you a good idea of what to put.

 

In case the guys haven't said already, as well as the names of the conditions you have, you need to spell out how the symptoms affect you and how they affect your daily life.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?316210-ESA50-Guide

 

My best, HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the new law being sneaked in under the radar by this govt, are changing the wca to where you can only use one part of either the mental or physical functions they will no longer be combined to give an overall score...this was highlighted by Nysgamite in a new thread recently posted...so you will either be assessed under the physical descriptors or under the mental descriptors but not both.....

 

This is not how I understood this. I think basically what they are saying (which is still awful) is that say if you have MS, and you have depression stemming from the MS, they won't give you points for the depression, but if you had two seperate conditions, say MS and schizophrenia, you would get points for both. My husband has mental health problems that give him extreme fatigue, therefore he wouldn't get physical points for the fatigue as it stems from a mental health condition, but if he developed arthritis, then he would get points for thst. Not sure if I explained that well....

  • Confused 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have bipolar disorder so that is judged as mental health condition, I also suffer from FMS which affects me physically and causes pain and fatigue but is classed as a physical condition of its own. So both should be recognised having been diagnosed by speciailists in the relevant fields.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PROBLEM 2: SEPARATING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH The government is also trying to change the way people’s conditions are assessed by dividing health problems into two separate boxes: ‘physical’ and ‘mental’. When looking at what tasks people can do, only the ‘physical half’ of the test will apply to those with physical disabilities. The same goes for the effects of treatment: for e.g., if you’re taking mental health medication, only mental health side-effects will be looked at. This completely fails to understand the way that many disabilities and illnesses can lead to both physical and mental effects. This is also the case for many common treatments: such as those for schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. Pretending the effects of illnesses and disabilities can be separated in this way goes against all medical practice. Going even further, and using this method to ignore sick and disabled people’s needs, is at best hopeless policy, and at worst deliberate cruelty. link http://labourlist.org/2013/01/esasos-the-government-are-sneaking-through-major-changes-to-how-disabled-people-are-assessed/

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the ESA50 is completed by a friend . Reasons given on page 20 Filling the questionnaire for someone else.

Ringing doctor next as will be applying for a home visit due to unstable Angina.{ not got a date letter says I may be asked to come to an assessment.} Who wants to bet im off to a assessment.then. Will tell you all what happens with the doctors watch this space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Well the ESA50 is completed by a friend . Reasons given on page 20 Filling the questionnaire for someone else.

Ringing doctor next as will be applying for a home visit due to unstable Angina.{ not got a date letter says I may be asked to come to an assessment.} Who wants to bet im off to a assessment.then. Will tell you all what happens with the doctors watch this space.

I have unstable angina no medical nothing from atos dwp put me in wrag

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah the wrag group

If you have previous with ATOS and they know you will appeal they may choose to place you straight into the WRAG without a F2F. The decision to put you in the Contributions based WRAG means your ESA will be time limited to 12 months, that means if you have been in receipt of ESA 3 months prior to the decision to place you in the WRAG being made, you have only 9 months of ESA left before you lose your entitlement and someone else i.e your partner has to keep you because they are earning more than £150.00 per month.

You will also be required to attend 5 back to work reviews where you will be advised of the help available to assist you back to work. You may be required to attend training programmes at the whim of your advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you find yourself in the unfortunate position of being placed in the WRAG Contributory ESA and you believe you should be in the Support group Contributory ESA, contact the DWP and ask for the ESA 85 report, the score sheet and a GL 24 appeal form and appeal to be placed in the Support group immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does the £150 per month come from? I was told it's nearer £7500 per year.

 

Yeah, that's either hyperbole or simply bad information. A partner can work up to 24 hours per week and earn up to £10 per week more than the claimant's IR entitlement (including any applicable premiums) before ESA stops completely.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...