Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

He would be very silly indeed if he tried to force entry, you could complainto OFT under credit fitness,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

typical, the bailiff has just rung to say he is too busy to come back to us today, he is returning the paperwork to the office tomorrow and we are to ring the office to make a payment. I think I will pay the outstanding installment directly to the council and then email a copy of the receipt to the bailiffs office. Any thoughts on that plan of action?

Edited by dean50
Link to post
Share on other sites

typical, the bailiff has just rung to say he is too busy to come back to us today, he is returning the paperwork to the office tomorrow and we are to ring the office to make a payment. I think I will pay the outstanding installment directly to the council and then email a copy of the receipt to the bailiffs office. Any thoughts on that plan of action?

 

He has been caught out.

 

It is quite possible that the bailiff has either read the forum, many do, or he knew he couldnt carry out the forced entry.

 

Pay the council direct. I would also add that you do need to pay for a visit fee. That would be £24.50 for the first visit, if he made a second visit this would be another £18.00. These you must pay. As for the levy, you can argue that this was invalid due to the fact that there were insufficient items on the levy to cover the debt, fee's and charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi my name is dean50, on january 8th you helped me with a council tax problem with bristol and suter i was advised to pay the council direct. on febuary 1st we paid the council 100 pounds and will pay more in march. today they came back again and said they wanted full settlement 800 pounds or tomorrow they will be back a locksmith. i missed two payments to them dec jan after losing my job in december. the levy on my goods is for tv and dvd player. regards dean50

Link to post
Share on other sites

There will be no locksmith the bailiff is talking dribble keep them out

 

there is no right of entry

 

Levy on a tv and dvd player that would not cover his fees let alone the debt

 

Who are you paying council or bailiffs?

it should be the council direct

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring the council dean50, They sent a bailiff out to me last week (i wasnt in) Ive just rang them sorted out regular dd payment and the bailiffs womt be calling again. If it wasnt for this site, i would of let them in thinking there was no other choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could this be bordering on harasment, i am trying to pay?

 

have you written to the council about there agents actions and the invalid levy? what was there response?

 

you should contact your local MP explain how the bailiffs have a levy on a tv and a dvd player on a debt of £800 which has been done to gain fees for the bailiffs

,how they are threatening you with locksmith

 

once they contact the council it should have this sorted

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

we paid the council 100 pounds on line, the bailiff said the money goes to them. i did not let the bailiff in today. have just spoken to council, they said the account is with bailiffs and payments must go to them. apparently i have to talk to bailiffs and come up with a repayment plan as it is now out of councils hands. what to do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

we paid the council 100 pounds on line, the bailiff said the money goes to them. i did not let the bailiff in today. have just spoken to council, they said the account is with bailiffs and payments must go to them. apparently i have to talk to bailiffs and come up with a repayment plan as it is now out of councils hands. what to do now?

 

that is normal council dribble

 

Please take the advice you have been given about paying the council direct you DO NOT need to deal with the bailiffs

You spoke to the council i assume on the phone you will be better to write to them tell them how much and when you are going to pay

 

however

 

if you wanted to be charged lots of money and be in a worse situation that you are in now

by all means deal with the bailiffs

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have looked on line at my council tax bill and 100 pounds has come of it. the bailiff has lied to me, he said the money went to them not the council. according to the ministry of justice he is not allowed to lie

Link to post
Share on other sites

have looked on line at my council tax bill and 100 pounds has come of it. the bailiff has lied to me, he said the money went to them not the council. according to the ministry of justice he is not allowed to lie

No they aren't supposed to lie, but remeber Rule No 1

Bailiffs Lie!

many of them wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them across the face with a wet herring

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

reading back through your post............

 

1/ are you still unemployed ?if so bailiff action not appropriate and should stop

2/the levy on the tv and dvd player have you written to the council (formal complaint) about the invalid levy as been done to gain fees what was there response?

3/Have you written to your local MP what was there response?

4/continue to pay the council direct weekly if need be so payment history stacks up

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

we paid the council 100 pounds on line, the bailiff said the money goes to them. i did not let the bailiff in today. have just spoken to council, they said the account is with bailiffs and payments must go to them. apparently i have to talk to bailiffs and come up with a repayment plan as it is now out of councils hands. what to do now?

 

This is not out of the councils hands at all, this is normal council response.

 

Has the bailiff ever been into your home, to levy on property, they cannot levy through a window, they have to be able to touch what they have levied, they then have to leave you an itemised list of what has been levied plus a what fee's and charges that have been added.

 

It has already been said, Bailiffs lie, this is a fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waited in all day, had stuck a removal of right of implied access form in the window and on the door which several people read as they walked past.

My wife had also printed off section 6 of the human rights act 1988, article 1 of the European convention on human rights, the ministry of justice national standards for enforcement agents, invalid levy, doormat levy, case law to back it all up, irregular distress, section 3 of the criminal damage act 1971, section 24/24a of the police and criminal evidence act 1984, section 25 of the theft act 1968, a form 4 which we had filled in with the exact details of the bailiff from the register of certified bailiffs and a list of the offences that could be committed by the bailiff.

A big white luton ldv van was parked in the street opposite for about an hour. A man walked up the road, stopped and read the sign, crossed the road and went over to the van. The van left about twenty minutes later. We never had a visit from the bailiff or his locksmith. Do you think they'll come back tomorrow? do you think the notice worked?

regards Dean50

Link to post
Share on other sites

We never had a visit from the bailiff or his locksmith. Do you think they'll come back tomorrow? do you think the notice worked?

regards Dean50

 

It has been pointed out already there is no locksmith no drilling of the lock no forced entry

They may turn up or they may give up

 

This seams to me to be going on far too long and could be brought to a closure a long time ago

 

The fact they have a levy on a TV and dvd player has been done to gain fees

 

Have you written to the council and local MP

 

I expect all that will happen is eventually the bailiffs will hand the case back to the council but will still want there fees

 

It is my belief that those implied right of access letters are a wast of paper and ink:-)

 

At the moment there is first visit fee

second visit fee

The levy fee on tv and dvd player

Van attendance fee

plus any other fees that want to put on

 

You could end this by writing to the appropriate people

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...