Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, why do DVLA (via that leaflet) say that S.88 MAY allow a driver to be treated as if they have a valid licence (after an application that discloses a medical condition) ?
    • Thanks for that, Bazza. It sheds some more light on things but I’m still by no means sure of the OP’s father’s likelihood of successfully defending the charge. This in particular from the guidance stands out me: He does not meet all the s88 criteria. S88 is clear and unambiguous: It makes no provision for either the driver or a medical professional to make a judgement on his fitness to drive under s88. S92(4) and the June 2013 guidance you mention defines in what circumstances the SoS must issue a licence. It does no modify s88 in any way. However, delving further I have noticed that the DVLA provides a service where the driver can enter a relevant medical condition to obtain the correct documentation to apply for a licence: https://www.gov.uk/health-conditions-and-driving/find-condition-online I haven’t followed this through because I don’ have the answers that the OP’s father would give to the questions they will ask and in any case it requires the input of personal information and I don’t want to cause complications with my driving licence. It is possible, however, that the end result (apart from providing the necessary forms) is a “Yes/No” answer to whether the driver can continue to drive (courtesy of s88). With that in mind, I should think at  the very least the OP’s father should have completed that process but there is no mention that he has. The Sleep Apnoea Trust gives some useful guidance on driving and SA: https://sleep-apnoea-trust.org/driving-and-sleep-apnoea/detailed-guidance-to-uk-drivers-with-sleep-apnoea/ I know nothing about SA at all and found It interesting to learn that there are various “grades” of the condition. But the significant thing which struck me is that it is only the least trivial version that does not require a driver to report his condition to the DVLA. But more significant than that is that the SA Trust makes no mention of continuing to drive once the condition has been reported. The danger here is that the court will simply deconstruct s88 and reach the same conclusion that I have. I accept, having looked at the DVLA guidance, that there may be (as far as they are concerned) scope for s88 to apply contrary to the conditions stated in the legislation. Firstly, we don’ know whether there is and secondly we don’t know whether the OP’s father would qualify to take advantage of it. Of course he could argue that he need no have reported his condition. The SA trust certainly emphasises that the condition should not be reported until a formal detailed diagnosis is obtained. But the fact is he did report it. As soon as he does that, as far as I can see,  s88 is no longer available to him. Certainly as it stands I maintain my opinion that he was not allowed to continue driving under s88. The only way I would change this is to see the end result of the DVLA exercise I mentioned above. If that said he could continue driving he would have a defence to the charge. Without it I am not confident.  
    • Americans are already keen on UK-made coins, and the Mint said it has seen a 118 per cent increase in sales to the US since 2022.View the full article
    • Right, my friend has just called me. He has indeed had to cancel bookings in the past from his end. There is a specific number for Booking.com that he calls.   After that Booking.com jump into action and contact you re refund and/or alternative accommodation. I suppose it's all logical - the party cancelling the booking has to inform Booking.com. So the gite owner needs to contact Booking.com on the cancellation number.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good day everyone,

 

long time reader, first time writer.

 

just thought I should share my experience, it might help some people.

 

 

Newlyn has been harassing for quite sometime now, probably up to a year now. It is regarding a parking ticket from Brent Council. I have received numerous text messages from Newlyn bailiffs such as "bailiffs are in your area and will remove your goods, go home quickly", "we are coming today to remove your goods, see you at 11.30am", some distressing text messages as well as letters.

 

Anyway, I kept ignoring them, but today (9 Oct 2012), I was paid a visit by a Newlyn bailiff, saying he is here to seize my vehicle unless I pay £431 immediately, I got my phone and started video recording, I first asked for his I.D., he showed it to me, I wanted to take a picture of it, but he refused. He said I dont need to record but I kept on recording, he said do I have the money, to which I replied no, but as I am not working, I am willing to make monthly payments, but he refused and demanded full payment.

 

I said, I cant give you what I dont have, he then parked his vehicle in my driveway, saying he's not going to leave until the tow truck gets here, I said fine, whatever makes you happy. I kept on video recording, I went up to his face while he was in his vehicle and kept on recording, he said why am I behaving like this, that I must be suffering from a disease, I said thanks for the insult and kept on recording, he was in his vehicle for about 20 mins, and then came out and said last chance, the tow truck is coming, I said I dont have any money but I'm willing to make monthly payments.

 

He then demanded I give him the keys to my car, to which I refused, he went back into his vehicle and I kept on recording, I then asked to see a documentation of how it mounted up to £431, and he refused saying that after I make payment, he will then give me the breakdown. I kept on recording, going round his car, recording everything. He then came out and said that he has to leave but he has called the tow truck and they can come anytime to collect the vehicle, then he left.

 

I just wanted to ask you guys for your opinion on the whole situation. Also, I am going to send the documents, emails and video to the OFT and file a complaint as well. These guys have been disturbing my life, the bailiff today he insulted me verbally and was quite rude.

 

Thanks for reading, I really appreciate it, and I apologize for any typographical and grammatical errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the pitbulls from newlyn on your case, were you aware of the PCN when they first called?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

honestly, I dont recall any PCN from Brent Council.

 

I presume that you can ask the Brent Council parking enforcement people for evidence of the PCN.

 

That is what I suggest that you do. Contact the council and get them to furnish the proof.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that you can ask the Brent Council parking enforcement people for evidence of the PCN.

 

That is what I suggest that you do. Contact the council and get them to furnish the proof.

 

Thanks. will definitely do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, did you own your car around the date of the alleged PCN, or have you bought it in the last 15 months or so? This could make a big difference, as then you wouldn't even be the debtor, and all that evidence and txts etc archived would be good in a complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warrant of execution is valid for just 12 months. You had said that Newlyn have been in touch with you fo about a year. You should make enquiries about this.

 

If you had not received any statutory notices ( in particular the Notice to Owner) then you are legally able to file an Out of Time Witness Statement. All enforcement will then be on hold. The bailiff enforcement will then cease.

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this PCN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old is your car whats its value ?

 

 

Newlyn has been harassing for quite sometime now, probably up to a year now

 

do you know the date of the warrant

 

value of the car is probably around £600.

 

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

 

Yes it was childish but it needed to be done, I have told him that I am not working, yet he insisted that I pay the full amount, I stressed it enough that I'm willing to make payments, but still demanded full amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like from your description that you acted in a childish manner in this situation,

Why couldnt you just be up front - look im not working heres my dole book this is how much ive got coming in each week/month etc rather than deliberetly trying to make a scene by putting your phone in his face

 

That was a totally unhelpful comment to make. Far from being childish, it was a brave action to take and it may help others who are scared of bailiff visits. Maybe the OP was lucky that the bailiff was not as aggressive as some though it could also be that by videoing him, it prevented him from actions he may have taken with some one less able to stand up for them selves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a totally unhelpful comment to make. Far from being childish, it was a brave action to take and it may help others who are scared of bailiff visits. Maybe the OP was lucky that the bailiff was not as aggressive as some though it could also be that by videoing him, it prevented him from actions he may have taken with some one less able to stand up for them selves.

 

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

 

No you are wrong, I want to pay the fine, but the bailiff wanted the full payment on the spot. Why wouldn't I want to pay what I am owing, all I asked was for documentation (breakdown) of the charges and a payment plan, but he refused and was quite rude. More so, I told him I was on job seekers, told him I can bring proof if he wants, but he was not interested, all he wanted was £431 right there and then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever the whys and wherefores, if OP had no knowledge of the PCN until newlyn turned up, then the OOT may be an option, As to filming a bailiff, well I would make a point of doing so, for the bailiffs protection as well as mine, I would film them as a favour if a bailiff called on any of my neighbours also.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish. This is my opinion, an opinion and observation. Just because it isnt in line with yours and others narrow minded opinions about debt collection doesnt make it any less valid. Now we can only go off what the OP says, and the impression i get is that the OP had/has no intention on paying the parking fine and chose to attempt to antagonise the bailiff that came around, probably causing him to dig his heels in a bit instead of going away armed with the info regarding being unemployed which could of been easily passed over.

You obviously do have opinions but to suggest that I and others on this forum who think that bailiffs are an anachronism in the 21st century are narrow minded would perhaps

indicate that you are a bailiff or your sympathies rest with them rather than people who are in financial trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Senusret it would seem strange that the bailiff would not have clamped or even levied on your car when he was there. perhaps the Warrant had expired and all he could do was to put the frighteners on you.

Do not lose the video it may become very helpful to you later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the warrant has expired, in which case the bailiff has no lawful back up, and on another thread, I will find it later, apparently it cannot be renewed after the 12 months, so is on dodgy ground imho, as yes he would have most likely clamped the car by now otherwise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

 

Op needs to tell exactly when they first knew about this, were they the car owner at the time of issue of the PCN, did they buy it after the PCN, and the bailiff has data cleansed the warrant in some way, but whatever it is now likely out of time?

 

We cannot move forward with advice without more background information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say newlyn have been leaving letters and sending text messages for about a year and to quote your original post

"anyway, i kept ignoring them" doesnt sound like you want to tackle this really.

Also suggests this isnt the first the OP has heard about this.

And just because my answer to the original post isnt the same as every other thread and poster

-bailiffs in the wrong

-complain to company council and form 4

-must be fraud by false representation

-must be making the fees up

-remove the companies license

Does not mean i must be a bailiff

 

yes, newlyn and their bailiffs have been in contact for a year and whenever I call them, asking and begging them to set up a payment plan, they both refused and threatened if I don't pay the full amount immediately they are coming to seize goods, I've called newlyn on several occasions and their reply was either you pay up now or we'll leave it to the bailiffs to seize your goods, I told them my circumstances and everything but they refused to negotiate and kept sending me threatening letters and text messages all the time. More so, I don't remember receiving any PCN from Brent council, they have not even told me the date the incident happened, at least I'll now if I was the owner at that time. All they want is £431, right now, they cant even give me a breakdown. Anyway, I've filed a complaint against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just concentrate on what you need to do.

 

Contact Brent for a copy of the PCN. ( There may still be a way of appealing this, depending on the details)

 

Once you have that, if it is all in order and there are no grounds for appeal, the see what you can do to settle the PCN based on your ability to pay and to only pay the bailiff fees that are legit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I provided the follwoing advice. I am therefore at a losss to understand why you are saying that you want to pay. Why would you wnat to pay for something that you have no knowledge about??

 

The warrant of executionlink3.gif is valid for just 12 months. You had said that newlynlink3.gif have been in touch with you for about a year. You should make enquiries about this.

 

If you had not received any statutory notices ( in particular the Notice to Owner) then you are legally able to file an Out of Time Witness Statement. All enforcement will then be on hold. The bailifflink3.gif enforcement will then cease.

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I provided the follwoing advice. I am therefore at a losss to understand why you are saying that you want to pay. Why would you wnat to pay for something that you have no knowledge about??

 

 

 

I would almost certainly suggest that you call Brent Council to make enquiries about this

 

 

will definitely do. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any statements made by certificated bailiffs and their employers that are not supported by hard evidence should ALWAYS be treated with suspicion and ALWAYS checked out with the relevant authority, etc.. NEVER take what a certificated bailiff says at face value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...